http://blog.beliefnet.com/blogalogue/2007/07/what-civilization-does-harry-p.html

As to the poor English, I have a valid excuse, it is my second language. German is my first. What excuse do the critics have? Maybe the terrible decline of the American educational system as a whole? If so, thank God (and Harry Potter) for children reading books again these days…

My American husband read his first book at the age of 25 after he read the bible for the first time and decided he wanted to emulate Jesus. The thought never occured to him in church and neither did anyone ever encourage him to read a whole book. He found The Message at church and read the entire thing through in slow motion, seeing that he could barely read at all.

What are they teaching the kids in school these days?

Yuck! Luscious just snagged a huge spider and is teaching little Flako how to eat it…

While some of these talks wouldn’t interest me (enough with the Freud, already), some would be fascinating. The maturity level demonstrated in the responses shows these poor people in dire need of remedial English and a course on critical thinking.

Perhaps they’re more up to studying something like this–The Five Single Gags Comprising the Garfield Comic Strip For Over 26 Years and and What This Reveals About Artistic Ingenuity. Nah. Too difficult.

Goodness! Luscious BadBoy is at it again, eating a dead fly…

Dear Mr Granger

Stephen McGinty

My response:

Dear Mr. McGinty,

I just linked to your 2006 article on Ms. Rowling in my discussion at HogwartsProfessor.com about Ms. Rowling’s latest comments about her “struggling to believe.” Thank you for that excellent article and for writing me today.

Right to your questions:

1) How would you rebut the criticism of the books, particularly from the Pope, that they are almost satanic?

I am not Catholic but the Pope never said anything like “the Harry Potter books are Satanic.” You can read the whole story of how a group of crazy Catholic traditionalists launched that scam in 2005 at http://hogwartsprofessor.com/?p=26. Ms. Rowling said in 2000 that all questions about her beliefs would be evident in the seventh book. As you know, Deathly Hallows was certainly testimony to Christian faith. Anyone with a culture warrior’s agenda could possibly continue to criticize her books but no thinking reader can miss their significant and edifying message and morals.

2) How would you respond to outsiders that you are taking “children’s books” too seriously?

First I’d say that since Prisoner of Azkaban more adults have been reading these books than children or adults reading to children. The themes, symbols, and compost of great literature (Ms. Rowling’s description of her inspiration) evident in these books make them substantive reading.

Second, and more important, the Harry Potter books are a cultural phenomenon of the first order. No book not inspired by God or penned by Chairman Mao has ever achieved the global popularity and holding power that Ms. Rowling’s novels have. Anyone not interested in exploring why these books are as popular as they are, frankly, is not a thinking person. My approach has been to “take Harry seriously” as literature rather than as a cultural artifact; my answer to the question of “whence Potter-mania?” is (a) the artistry of her work, (b) the postmodern themes themes that resonate with the beliefs and concerns of our age, and (c) the transcendent meaning she reaches at and hit in her use of traditional symbols and story points.

3) Would you consider JK Rowling a contemporary CS Lewis?

Yes and No! Lewis, as Andrew Lazo has written, was a distinctly modern writer writing to and for an audience that had seen Victorian ideas crash and die in the trenches of WWI and in the war with the Nazis. Ms. Rowling is not a Christian apologist or evangelical and she is not writing a novel for moderns.

She has written a series of novels, however, with tremendous “religious undertones” (her words) and undertones suited to the spiritual capabilities and needs of the people she is writing for, a decidedly different audience than Lewis had. As I explain at length in Unlocking Harry Potter: Five Keys for the Serious Reader, she is a postmodern Christian, more liberal, uncomfortable with church authority and institutions of any kind, and suspicious of those without doubts and second thoughts Hence her 2006 comments to you about faith and Graham Greene). She is a Christian artist and a profound one but not like Tolkien, Sayers, or Lewis.

A curious point of contact between Lewis and Rowling that is usually overlooked in the haste to equate or distinguish them as Christian writers is that they both were literary alchemists. Lewis’ Space Trilogy is the modern classic that revived the use of alchemical structures and images in the novel; Rowling’s Harry Potter books are the postmodern equivalent (she said in 1998 that alchemy set the magical parameters and logic of the books and there are three chapters in Unlocking explaining the depth of her use of literary alchemy).

Anyway, I hope this helps! Thank you again for your January 2006 article in The Scotsman, one of the best in the Interlibrum, and for writing me this morning with your questions.

John

How do they think Shakespeare got to be “the Master”? Curious people started looking at his work critically, comparing and contrasting it to what they already deemed worthy. They took it beyond the level of feeling, stylistic opinion and entertainment value to try and actually textually support their claims. Oh, and they didn’t seem to mind that magic permeated Will’s world; his portrayal of human personhood still resonated as true to life, from many angles. And let’s not even start with Joyce or Blake…

I do, however, find it weakly funny that so many of the comments are full of grammatical, spelling, and punctuation errors. It seems, sadly, that English class was just an all-around waste for these individuals. That’s one of the most disappointing things I’ve discovered this week; my English major half is deeply saddened.

Stephen McGinty mocks Prophecy 2007 as:

Harry Potter and the Weird Academic Theories
STEPHEN McGINTY

IT could be called Harry Potter and the Order of the Egg Head Academics. The books and films that have delighted and enchanted millions of children are being scrutinised for secret codes and hidden meanings by academics and fans at the world’s largest symposium dedicated to the boy wizard.

More than 1,500 muggles (non-magical folk) will arrive at the Sheraton Centre in downtown Toronto today for the beginning of a four-day convention at which Harry Potter will be compared to Jesus Christ, Hermione Granger will be revealed as a feminist and Lord Voldemort will be diagnosed as a “malignant narcissist”. (Lets hope he doesn’t hear.)

The topics of discussion at From Hero to Legend, as the convention is called, would soar, like a golden snitch, clear over the heads of many young Harry Potter readers.

Now the series is complete after book seven, Harry Potter and The Deathly Hallows, there is clearly much more to say about the boy wizard.

However, children, as well as less devoted adults, would surely grow restless when presented with a 50-minute lecture by Gwendolyn Limback (who sounds like a Potter character herself) entitled: ‘Conjuring Her Self: Hermione’s Self Determination in Harry Potter’. Or Sharon Power’s lecture, ‘Freud and the Fetishistic Phantasy: Magic, Desire, and Loss in Harry Potter’, a 20-minute romp through the characters’ relationships with magic objects.

No? Then how about Angela Beth Fulk’s analysis of ‘Boarding School Homoeroticism’ or ‘Genetics: Muggle or Magic’, in which Kathleen Hohman uses the latest genetic research to determine what would be the indicators, on a genetic level, of who gets to cast spells and ride on a broomstick.

The idea of hundreds of adults thoughtfully chewing on the legs of their round Harry Potter specs as they are lectured on Master Potter’s adventures in the context of international relations – another genuine lecture – may strike those few readers immune to JK Rowling’s spell as rather strange.

William Shakespeare, James Joyce, William Blake – surely these are the authors who deserve such obsessive study?

[Clink link above for more -- be sure to read the comments at the end of the article! Ouch!]

http://www.christianitytoday.com/ct/2007/julyweb-only/130-22.0.html

I’ve never tried to copy a link, so don’t know if it worked. But you can look it up on their website.

Got to lube the kitties with hairball unguent…