Mailbag: Help with Christian Harry Hater

This plea for assistance or advice was in my inbox this morning:

Dear Mr. Granger,

I am asking for some advice on how to handle fellow Christians who are disrespectful towards people who enjoy Harry Potter.

I recently conversed back and forth on Instagram with a very condescending Christian who labeled me as “dense” for disagreeing with his arguments and muggle-like attitude–lol. 

I am curious how you would respond to the following claims he made:

  • Harry Potter contains pagan practices;
  • Real occult references and symbolism are in the books;
  • Harry Potter contains information about “magick”, sigils, and spells (that sounds like some Richard Abanes propaganda);
  • The Deathly Hallows symbol is designed from Solomonic sigil magick;
  • Incantations are bad (not fantasy) and are called “magick” (he conveniently ignores the fact that incantations and spells are present in both The Lord of the Rings and The Chronicles of Narnia and yet defends both of those book series);
  • Harry Potter promotes the heresy of gnosticism;
  • Harry Potter story elements are based on real occultic legends/people, i.e.; Alastor Moody based on Aleister Crowley, Cassandra Vablatsky based on Helena Blavatsky, the Philosopher’s Stone, and the Hand of Glory;
  • J.K. Rowling’s tattoo is demonic (I thought your argument posted on Hogwarts Professor sufficiently debunked this already); and
  • J.K. Rowling has not outrightly pronounced her faith (we already know that is false).

I tried recommending your book How Harry Cast His Spell to him and asked if he would give it a chance–but he’s so stubborn and pious that he can’t be open to another viewpoint. He claims to have been studying gnosticism and magick for ten years and says that all of these things while not directly involving invocational magic are how the Devil promotes sinful storytelling and rebellion against God.

As a conservative Christian and a Potterhead, how would you counter these bold arguments?

Thank you for all the work you’re doing and God Bless 🙂

Josh

Where to begin, Josh? I am an Orthodox Christian and a Perennialist-inclined literary critic rather than “conservative” or a “Potterhead” but I see your point that I don’t see the Hogwarts Saga as does this heresy hunter and Harry Hater.

Every one of these claims made by your Instagram sparring partner, as you noted, was made by Richard Abanes in his Harry Potter and the Bible : The Menace Behind the Magick(2001). That doesn’t mean that the claim is ipso facto in error; it actually means that there is evidence that the claim is true but the argument is wrong-headed. As you point out more than once that he was not receptive to discussion or “open to another viewpoint,” I don’t think you should spend any more time than you already have trying to persuade him.

I’d ask you to think about three things to prevent you from slipping into the pious surety of this internet maven you tangled with online.

First, my books on the Christian content and structure of the Harry Potter books and series were not written as ammunition to deploy against those who have decided not to read the book or those who campaign against their supposed “corruption of the youth.” My goal when talking about Rowling’s traditional artistry has been primarily to explain to readers who love the Wizarding World adventures why they love them.

Life is short and there is no end of books to read; there is no point in wrestling verbally with those who choose either not to engage with Harry Potter and friends or to make decrying Rowling’s fantasy fiction an article and touchstone of their faith. The exercise is not edifying to the For or the Against debaters and as often as not makes the Defender of Dumbledore begin to sound and act like his or her dismissive opponent.

Second, as rich as the books are in Christian content, symbolism, even narrative structure (and I hope to be revisiting this subject soon in light of remarkable insights from a professor in Illinois Who Must Not Be Named), there are elements in the books that most Christians would consider immoral, e.g., the torture of Slytherin bullies on the Hogwarts Express at the end of Goblet of Fire. Rowling herself has recently said she has changed her mind about the morality of assisted suicide, which makes Dumbledore’s sacrificial death at a friend’s hand lamentable. These books, uplifting and challenging and meaningful as they are, are not a postmodern Pilgrim’s Progress.

And, third, the work I have been doing consequent to Rowling’s ‘Lake and Shed’ 2019 interview suggests that the Harry Potter series can be read as the author’s prolonged feminist argument in Christian symbols for pre-natal infanticide (‘induced abortion’). See this conversation I had with Nick Jeffery for why that reading is credible and this discussion of alternative explanations for the ‘Lost Child’ Golden Thread in Rowling’s work.

We’re a long way, Josh, from the black-and-white reading of Harry Potter in which those with misgivings about the books are necessarily ignorant boobs and those who love them are by definition on the side of the angels. That’s especially true when you factor in the fandom leaders who now think of Rowling as the transphobic anti-Christ when they used to idolize her every thought and tweet and the one time Harry Haters who are now Team Rowling because of her stand against the surgical mutilation and chemical castration of children and adolescents.

The books haven’t changed but their Serious Readers have, for and against, and our appreciation of the Hogwarts Saga has been deepened and challenged simultaneously by all we have learned about the author since 2007 and about her children’s books consequent to her many post Potter publications.

To conclude, then, I’d leave you first with Twain’s advice not to wrestle with a pig (“you get filthy dirty and the pig likes it”) and then with my encouragement to read the Harry Potter novels with an open mind yourself. No, Richard Abanes’ ‘arguments by association’ remain logically invalid, but there’s a world of unanswered questions about this wonderful seven book series still to explore, most notably, “What unresolved trauma in Rowling’s life inspired her to write them?”

Thank you for writing and best wishes in your serious reading!

John

The JKR 60th Birthday Party Kanreki Celebration Index: Links and Blurb summaries of the 31 Lake and Shed Conversations of Rowling’s Life and Work in July 2025

Last month, Nick Jeffery and I logged a marathon of Kanreki ‘Lake and Shed’ posts at our Substack site in celebration of Rowling’s life and work at her 60th birthday. Nick has been re-posting links to that work here at the weblog and now I have assembled below an easy-to-access-and-reference single place for readers to find any part of this fun series. Enjoy!

Introduction to the Kanreki Project

On 31 July 2025, Joanne Murray, aka J. K. Rowling and Robert Galbraith, celebrated her 60th birthday. This specific celebration is considered a ‘second birth’ in Japan or Kanreki because it is the completion of the oriental astrological cycle. To mark JKR’s Kanreki, 還暦, Dr John Granger and Nick Jeffery, both Nipponophiles, read through Rowling’s more than twenty published works and reviewed them in light of the author’s writing process, her ‘Lake and Shed’ metaphor. The ‘Lake’ she said in 2019 and 2024 is the source of her inspiration and the ‘Shed’ is the alocal place of her intentional artistry, in which garage she transforms the biographical stuff provided by her subconscious mind into the archetypal stories that have made her the most important author of her age.

Join us after the jump for the complete compendium of the Harry Potter, Cormoran Strike, Fantastic Beast, ‘Stand Alone’ stories, and Golden Thread posts! [Read more…]

Pregnancy Traps in Every Rowling Story: The Golden Thread of Coercive Love

Dr. John Granger and Nick Jeffery explore the theme of pregnancy traps and coercive love, as a golden thread running through all the published works of J. K. Rowling. The new episode can be downloaded over on the Hogwarts Professor Substack.

After a long delay, Rowling studies returns with a discussion of a theme that is found throughout Rowling’s work. The Hogwarts Professor posts that John and Nick reference can be found here:

Rowling Pregnancy Traps: Merope Gaunt

Rowling Pregnancy Traps: Casual Vacancy’s Krystal Weedon, Kay Bawden

Rowling’s Pregnancy Traps: Bellatrix Lestrange and the Cursed Child Delphini

Rowling’s Pregnancy Traps: Leda Strike

Rowling’s Pregnancy Traps: Four Strikes

Rowling’s Pregnancy Traps: Last Strikes

Rowling’s Pregnancy Traps: Fantastic Beasts, The Ickabog, The Christmas Pig

Rowling’s Pregnancy Traps: Fantastic Beasts, The Ickabog, The Christmas Pig

This is the last of seven ‘Pregnancy Trap’ posts that explore one of the more curious Golden Threads that run through everything Rowling has written.  The first six can be found at the link above and include deep dives into the Big Four traps that define in some sense the Harry Potter series, Cursed Child, the Cormoran Strike mysteries, and Casual Vacancy. The last two entries in the series have been loving looks at the individual books of the Strike-Ellacott stories, which in addition to being grounded in the Leda Strike-Jonny Rokeby Pregnancy Trap feature novel-specific characters whose lives included some kind of “coercive love;” the first post covered the first four books in the series and the most recent the last three.

Today I close out the survey with a relatively quick look at the Fantastic Beasts screenplays, The Ickabog tale, and The Christmas Pig.  I’ll wrap up this Pregnancy Trap Golden Thread in an article on the Substack page and a ‘Rowling Studies’ podcast for subscribers before moving on to the next Golden Thread ‘common denominator’ in her work.

Book-by-book, then, the Pregnancy Traps or “Coercive Love” to be found in Fantastic Beasts, The Ickabog, and The Christmas Pig!

Fantastic Beasts

I’m not a fan of the Fantastic Beasts films because, as a serious reader of J. K. Rowling, there’s very little certainty about what parts are hers in this collaborative exercise. Scroll down to the bottom of this post for a collection of links to articles about the elusive shooting script written by Rowling for a clue about what I’m saying.) That being said, a complete survey of Rowling’s works to list all the Pregnancy Traps wouldn’t be complete without a look at the three Beasts screenplays.

There aren’t any Pregnancy Traps! But there is a lot of “coercive love” of different sorts, all critically important to the ensemble cast’s lives and plot points. [Read more…]

Rowling’s Pregnancy Traps: Last Strikes

This, again, is not a proper ‘Pregnancy Trap’ post with a long-form focus on one or two traps that define a particular work. Here is another hurried catalogue of all the “coercive love” relationships in the Strike-Ellacott mysteries: it follows the ‘Rowling Pregnancy Traps: First Four Strikes‘ post in which I reviewed the several traps encountered from Cuckoo to Lethal White. This post covers the most recent three novels in the series, Troubled Blood to Running Grave. I have written longish posts about the ‘Big Four’ Pregnancy Traps that play defining roles in the Harry Potter novels (Merope and Tom, Sr.), in Casual Vacancy (Krystal and Fats), in Cursed Child (Bellatrix and Tom, Jr.), and in the Strike series (Leda and Jonny); with this post and one other that surveys The Ickabog, Christmas Pig, and Beedle the Bard, I’ll wrap up this Pregnancy Trap Golden Thread in an article on the Substack page and a ‘Rowling Studies’ podcast for subscribers before moving on to the next Golden Thread ‘common denominator’ in her work.

Book-by-book, then, the Pregnancy Traps to be found in Troubled Blood, Ink-Black Heart, and Running Grace!

Troubled Blood

[See the first comment beneath this post for the Pregnancy Trap in Strike5 that I left out of the first version of this piece, the most important Trap of this specific book, of the Strike-Ellacott series, and perhaps of everything Rowling has written.]

  • Sarah Shadlock’s Trapping Matt Cunliffe

Readers learn in Lethal White with Robin’s discovery of the diamond earring in the Cunliffe conjugal bed that Matt and Sarah have been sleeping together. It comes as little surprise because since Career of Evil Matt’s old friend from University has been “shit stirring,” i.e., implying when she and the engaged and then married couple are together that Robin must be attracted to Cormoran and sexually tempted by him. This is not to mention, of course, Rowling having revealed in Strike3 that Robin’s fiancée had slept with Sarah while at Uni after Ms Ellacott was raped at her school and been unavailable to him at home due to her year-long agoraphobia.

The slow-release of Sarah’s long-term plan to hook herself the husband she wants, Matt Cunliffe not Tom Turvey, though, comes at last in Troubled Blood, Rowling’s wondrous fifth Strike-Ellacott mystery and perhaps the best single novel she has written. She has Robin learn via a phone call with Shadlock’s furious fiancée Turvey in a crowded Christmas season department store that Sarah has moved on to (moved in with?) Matt; she inwardly reviewed that conversation in her head while sitting with Strike in the store’s cafe:

A waiter had arrived at the table. When both had ordered coffee, and Robin some toast, each relapsed into silence. Robin was looking away from the window toward the shoppers stocking up on fancy groceries for Christmas down on the shop floor and re-running Tom Turvey’s outburst in her head. The aftershocks were still hitting her. Four weeks before my fucking wedding. It must have been called off. Sarah had left Tom for Matthew, the man she’d wanted all along, and Robin was sure she wouldn’t have left Tom unless Matthew had shown himself ready to offer her what Tom had: diamonds and a change of name. I’m the only one of us who hasn’t been fucking around. Everyone had been unfaithful, in Tom’s opinion, except poor Tom… so Matthew must have told his old friend that she, Robin, had been sleeping with someone else (which meant Strike, of course, of whom Matthew had been perennially jealous and suspicious from the moment Robin had gone to work for him). And even now that Tom knew about Matthew and Sarah, after his old friend’s duplicity and treachery had been revealed, Tom still believed the lie about Robin and Strike. Doubtless he thought his current misery was all Robin’s fault, that if she hadn’t succumbed to Strike, the domino effect of infidelity would never have been started. (Part Three, Chapter 24)

Rowling rolls out the Pregnancy Trap that Shadlock had been compelled to set only after the final divorce mediation between the long-separated Cunliffes. Ellacott deduces that Sarah had deliberately become ‘preggers’ to secure the vacillating Matt:

“Yeah.” He hesitated. “It was an accident.”

Was it hell, thought Robin. Sarah had always known how to get what she wanted. Robin realized at last how long a game Sarah had played: always present, giggling, flirting, prepared to settle for Matthew’s best friend to keep him close. Then, as her clutch tightened, but Matthew threatened to slip through it, there’d been the diamond earring she’d left in Robin’s bed and now, still more valuable, a pregnancy to make sure of him, before he could enter a dangerous state of singledom. Robin had a strong suspicion that this was what had lain behind the two postponements of mediation. Had a newly hormonal and insecure Sarah made scenes, frightened of Matthew coming face to face with Robin while he hadn’t yet decided whether he wanted either the baby or its mother?

“And she wants to be married before she has it?”

“Yeah,” said Matthew. “Well, so do I.” (Part Five, Chapter 55)

“A pregnancy to make sure of him”… Once again, Rowling uses “coercive love,” a pregnancy trap in a key story relationship. The successful trap that secures clueless Matt to Sarah, effectively closes the Cunliffe story-line in the Strike novels (if hope springs eternal that the man Louise Freeman refers to as the “flubberworm” will make a cameo of some kind in the last three books; he has to harbor thoughts of revenge against Strike, no?).

  • Janice Beattie’s Failed Trap of Her Son’s Father

During Strike’s end of novel confrontation with the “Poisoner Granny” in her flat’s Red Room, Rowling reveals that the serial killer had years before tried to win an engagement ring from her beaux by becoming pregnant with his child. Strike has asked Beattie why she killed people after sharing with her that her son Kevin will be testifying against her, that he will be sharing in court the times his mother tried to poison his father, himself, and his child, her grand-daughter. Rowling lets her readers know only then that Janice’s wedding band was a front and that she had tried to win her husband by becoming pregnant: [Read more…]