Did Roth miss the Epigenetic Boat?

This post is a follow-up to Chana McCarthy’s keen insights in her guest post.  Allegiant was not the book I expected; and I must admit it is not love at first sight. But, having read the bombshell ending yesterday, and with a little recovery time I am liking it more and more. I am eager to go back for a re-read, so I can’t hate it too much.  I’ll come back with a post about what I did like later.

Right.

But, like Chana, I was most disappointed in the science of it, particularly when the psychology and neuroscience were so well handled in Divergent and Insurgent. The “genetic engineering study gone bad” is simply not believable on any level, even from the basic test they do in the lab. Helllooooo? If you need to do a genetic test on someone, it is far easier to take a cotton swab and scrape out some cheek cells than it is to inject your subject with some sort of micro-computer-packed serum.

Wrong.

I’m quite sure that the technology of basic cheek cell harvesting, of the type practiced in 9th grade biology classes all over, is not going to be lost over the next 300 years, no matter how many Purity Wars we have. The compound scientists may be reasonably well off financially, but there is no need for them to waste resources on a complicated serum when a Q-tip will do.

Second, if you have the technology to go in and “knock out” certain genes (for cowardice, low intelligence or whatever) it stands to reason that you would have the technology to reinsert the original sequences. It’s done with mice all the time. A basic understanding of DNA replication should make it clear that there is no reasonable mechanism for “healing” genes over time… the only way to “heal” a mutation is to rewrite the DNA sequence to get the original gene back: not something to be done one step at a time, over generations.  In fact, assuming the “experiments” started out with a population of diverse broken genes (some intelligence, some courage, etc) the last thing you want to do is isolate them and let them interbreed with each other for generations.  You are just as likely to wind up with people carrying multiple mutations that they inherited from different parents as you are to see people “healed.”  There is only one good reason for isolating genetic undesirables together: to make it easier to exterminate them all.

Interestingly, there is one hot new area of science that could have been used to make a bit more sense out of this storyline: epigenetics. Which is, in a nutshell, modifying not the DNA itself, but how it is packaged, to make certain genes more or less expressed or silenced entirely. [Read more…]

Allegiant Guest Post: A Better Answer to Divergent Questions

Science and the Factions by Chana McCarthy

Full disclosure — So far I’ve only skimmed through Allegiant since the story just failed to grab me.  I’ll look for inspiration from John and HogPro readers to see if a close reading is worth the time.

I loved Divergent. Tris and Tobias were strong, well-drawn characters and their growing love story was compelling.  The idea of the Factions was absolutely fascinating and my interest in life in the varied Factions even carried me through Insurgent (though I thought it a weaker book).

Any work of fantasy or science fiction has to be plausible enough for a reader to suspend disbelief; this is particularly challenging for authors who attempt multi-volume series.  Every ‘alien’ world begs certain questions.  The Harry Potter reader has to be able to believe that witches and wizards are roaming around contemporary London without us Muggles being any the wiser.  JK Rowling accomplished this with the Statute of Secrecy and the self-segregation of Wizarding kind.  Indeed these simple plot devices provide much of the ongoing humor in the Harry Potter series (consider one of my favorite chapters, The Other Minister).

The world of Divergent raises three basic questions:

1. Why was everyone in Chicago isolated from the outside world?
2. How did the Faction system evolve — or alternatively why was it imposed?
3. Why were the Factionless and Divergent considered a threat?

Allegiant postulates that the system arose out of a failed genetic experiment, but this answer is quite implausible and leaves Question 3 largely unanswered. It is unfortunate that Roth (a very talented, but young writer) seems to have done too little research and apparently never ran her ideas past any one trained in biology and/or medicine.  In fact there is a very simple, scientifically possible answer to the three questions that would have given the series a more interesting direction. [Read more…]

Allegiant: First Twenty Discussion Threads Round-Up

1 — Delighted or Disappointed?

2 — Predictions Scorecard

3 — ‘Choice, Real Choice’

*Guest Post: A Better Answer

4 — Allegory A: On Racism

5 — Allegory B: On Psychology

6 — Son of Mockingjay?

7 — Plato’s Cave: The Puppeteers

8 — Voice(s)

9 — Alchemy

10 — Mirror of Divergent Beginning and Allegiant End

11 — The Sacrifice

12 — Sex in the YA Novel

13 — Tobias’ Family and Choices

14 — Tris’ Brother and Parents

15 — O’hare Airport

16 — Forgiveness

17 — Supporting Roles

18 — Epistemology

19 — Review Links

20 — ‘Be Brave’

This will take me a week or two, I’m guessing. Thank you in advance for your patience. In the comment box below, please suggest/vote for Allegiant thread topics you’d like to see at HogwartsProfessor!

Allegiant 3: ‘Choice, Real Choice’

Can we talk ‘Theme’ for a moment? Or maybe we should just start with the cover verbage?

ONE CHOICE — ONE CHOICE Can Transform You, ONE CHOICE Can Destroy You, ONE CHOICE Will Define You

Let’s go out on a limb and say ‘Choice’ is a big part of what Ms Roth is ‘after’ in Allegiant. In the trilogy opener, the Choosing Day choice that Beatrice makes for Dauntless rather than Abnegation is the clear reference for the cover points; it’s the inciting incident for the series, after all.

The question is, what is the CHOICE in Allegiant that transforms, destroys, and defines YOU (I’m guessing not so much us as Tris and Four, but, as it says). Three possibilities: [Read more…]

Allegiant 2: Predictions Scorecard

I asked Dr. Louise Freeman, our resident Divergent authority, to share her predictions last week and she wrote me to say that what she’d already written would suffice. In bullet point form, her predictions were:

  • Marcus redeemed and dead,
  • Caleb probably just dead,
  • Pit flooded and
  • Tris leading a group of Dauntless back up the Hancock tower.

That’s about 50%, I’d say, depending on how you score Tris’ trip up the Tower. If you think that’s bad forecasting, (a) that’s very good for a HogwartsProfessor and (b) we specialize in exegesis, not tea leave reading. Read Prof Freeman’s brilliant A Dip in the OCEAN: Divergent Factions and the Big Five Personality Factors and A Dip in the OCEAN II: Double Dipping Dauntless: Can the neurotic be brave? for more along those lines!

In her alchemical predictions about the Rubedo elements to look for in Allegiant, Christine Wesley forecast so many details of the finale that I’m obliged to urge you to follow the link! No bullet point list could do it justice. I hope Christine will share her own scoring of her prediction in her hermetic follow-up to these predictions.

Her biggest hit, I think, was her writing that there would be a Marcus-Johanna alliance and her biggest miss was her Serum Theory of what caused the Chicago Experiment in Faction Living. I’m not sure I agree with the readers who wrote on the day of release that they wished Christine had written the ending because they were so disappointed in Allegiant and thought the Rubedo described here would have been more interesting, but I share their admiration for the alchemical alternative.

I didn’t make predictions except for a playful listing of possibilities of why there was a Five Faction World in the first place:

We are in the last months before Allegiant is published, which publication will reveal at last the secrets of the post-apocalypse Divergent psycho-drama theme park in Chicago.

Is it a mad scientist turned voyeur experiment for broadcasting a la The Truman Show? Are Tris and Tobias starring in another re-make of Special Service?

An Art Farm for human beings set up by aliens akin to King’s Under the Dome?

Or is this something like the Chicago ‘Projects,’ urban renewal and political correctness become self-perpetuating nightmare? Is Divergent something of a psychologist’s Cabrini Green?

I think that last one is close to a bulls eye strike and the first one came to mind a few times when we sat with those out at O’hare airport monitoring life in the Factions Project. Just sayin.’

Please share your thoughts in the comment boxes below, especially if you know of a Divergent expert who guessed, I mean, predicted a good deal of what we saw in Allegiant — without, that is, having procured a copy in advance