The game these two Potter enthusiasts play is choosing a Wizarding World spell from one hat, a Potter character’s name from another, and then doing an impression of that character saying the spell. The object of the game is not deceiving the other player but doing such a great impersonation that she ‘gets’ it immediately (I suppose to make this competitive, the game requires two or more pairs of players).
Perhaps there are other fandoms in which devoted fans could play this game with variations on the spells feature. But could they podcast such an amateur-hour production and expect more than three quarters of a million viewers to watch (881,000 at the time of this posting)? FYI, that’s a rhetorical question.



I have an American friend residing in Sri Lanka, a man writing a Young Adult series of novels with whom I correspond about ring composition and other writing devices. I look forward to sharing more here about Michael and his nomadic adventures when his books are published.
I confess to clicking through in each email he sends, despite or because of my complementary aversion and addiction to news stories (cue link to
Clicking through on the link provided, I didn’t find the reference to Lord Voldemort made by Mengyi; it seems to be rather hearsay that the newspaper writer wanted to include to cast the villain in the properly dark light. The Times repeats it because the reference works. Everyone reading the article knows who the Dark Lord is, that he is a very, very bad man, and will conclude that any man referring to himself as “Lord Voldemort” is as indifferent to others and to right and wrong as can be.



Recent Conversation