The Rowling Library #75 is Out! ‘What We Can Expect of the Wizarding Almanac’

As noted the day before yesterday, The Rowling Library‘s March issue has as its cover story Patricio Tarantino’s article on The Wizarding Almanac to be published this October by Bloomsbury. I’m pretty sure it’s the best coverage of this story done to date; he notes the shortcomings of the volume that are evident from the few pages readers have been shown in publicity materials while admiring the concept and the beautiful illustrations. Read the whole thing at TheRowlingLibrary.com, available to be read online or to download as a pdf.

There’s more to that issue, of course, my favorite being the re-visit to the conversation about a film adaptation of Harry Potter and the Cursed Child. Warner Brothers, for obvious reasons, really wants it to happen and to cast the original films’ trio of Radcliffe, Grint, and Watson. The TRL writers explain why that isn’t going to happen, reasons that might not occur to everyone, and I enjoyed it very much. I think you will, too!

The Harry Potter Wizarding Almanac

Bloomsbury announced late last week that they will be publishing a book this October, The Harry Potter Wizarding Almanac. For all the details from that announcement, your one-stop resource is TheRowlingLibrary.com; follow that link to TRL’s summary of what to expect in the book, an article I’m told more than 200,000 Potter fans have read. (Patricio Tarantino has already written up his thoughts on the Almanac which will be in this month’s TRL e-zine.)

If any doubters remain who are skeptical about the vitality of Harry Potter fandom, not the official Woke crowd but the gazillion readers who love the story, doubters who think that Rowling has in any way been cancelled, or who do not believe that the Hogwarts Saga remains the Shared Text of the new Millenium, the excitement (and sales) of Hogwarts Legacy and the Wizarding Almanac, not to mention ‘The Witch Hunt of J. K. Rowling’ podcast’s popularity, should help them see the light.

While the new book, available for pre-order, is only #337 this morning on Amazon’s best-seller list and #13 on the sub-category of ‘Children’s Fantasy,’ the #2, 9, and 12 slots on that list are filled by Harry Potter titles, #2 being the seven book series set in print now for fifteen years. Two of the top three titles on the Amazon Children’s ebook list are Potter books and all seven are in the top 25. A guide to Hogwarts Legacy is #39 on the current bestselling book list, the only gaming book there, of course.

I’m not excited about the Almanac, frankly, which promises to be a very beautiful book and an excellent Christmas present for Harry Potter fans. From what I have been read and been told, though, there is nothing new in it from the Rowling Vault miles beneath Gringotts and I doubt very much that its seven chapters, fan-service repackaging of canon material, however exciting the pictorial re-presentation of that information will be, will be anything to be shared with my grandchildren in our read-aloud time. I may buy a copy to review here if no one else does.

That being said, I am delighted by the show of enthusiasm for a new Bloomsbury Potter tome. Fantastic Beasts has been something of a bust relative to the original series, but reader engagement and interest in the Hogwarts Saga continues and seems to be making the essential jump for a classic text as Generation Hex grows up and shares it with their children. Three cheers for that and for the new and vibrant empirical evidence that the Rainbow Reich’s crusade to burn Rowling and her books at the stake has failed.

Strike Series Rankings: The Final Tally

Kurt Schreyer posted a challenge to his Cormoran Strike loving followers on social media to rank the six mysteries from most favorite to least favorite. You can read his summary of the challenge responses he received from his dinner guests and twitter audience as well as his own ranking of the six Strike novels here.

Seven of us who write at HogwartsProfessor responded to this idea with posts that included both rankings and our reasoning and criteria for preferring certain books to others. I started the task here and was followed by Beatrice Groves, Nick Jeffery, Louise Freeman, Chris Calderon, Evan Willis, and Elizabeth Baird-Hardy.

Join me after the jump for a tabulation of our rankings here, a comparison with the first twitter responses, and a few ideas about the various approaches Serious Strikers have taken to rank the series entries thus far with an eye to their merits and demerits. [Read more…]

John Granger – Strike Series Ranking

If you haven’t read the twitter responses that followed Kurt’s challenge to rank the six Strike novels now in print, please do. None of them, due to the medium, share the reasoning behind the rankings, but one did note that her ranking was based on whether the axiological measure was “for the murder case” or “for S&R’s relationship and personal life storylines,” justifying two lists by saying “I find it almost impossible to rank them otherwise.”

I think this tweeter is right in noting that the criteria is all important in this kind of ranking and that most readers will rank the stories best to worst based on the quality of each mystery, the quantity of romance and personal history-life drops, or both. As a contrarian and supposed Subject Matter Expert, I’m going to pretend the zip-factor of the narrative misdirection and the amount of ‘shipping and back-story material, with one exception, is not that important in assessing which is the best, the worst, and the middling in this series.

What matters instead, I suggest for your consideration, is the depth of the artistry, of the meaning, and of reader engagement, in brief, a ranking of the novels with respect to which deliver the most and the least anagogical material and archetypal experience in their structure, symbolism, and mythological content. In which Strike novels is Rowling-Galbraith at the top of her game, in other words, and when is she just calling it in, relatively speaking?

I have not read Kurt’s post on this subject yet, tempting as that is, lest his brilliance discourage me from doing anything more than writing “like he said!” I apologize in advance if that self-blinding means this post covers the same ground as the Submariner’s. If the clues he dropped in the thread and the choices of his dinner guests are any hint, there shouldn’t be much overlap in our rankings. Join me after the jump for my contribution to this rankings-with-reasoning HogwartsProfessor series. [Read more…]

First ‘Running Grave’ Epigraphs Out: Dylan Thomas Poem and I Ching Note

Three Cheers for the sleuths at The Rowling Library!

DV, we’ll soon have the citation from the I Ching and the translation Rowling-Galbraith is using.

Until then, your thoughts? That I Ching piece is suggestive, beyond the Norfolk Commune.

Did Shanker kill Leda or promise, at least, that he wouldn’t say why she committed suicide?