HogPro Live Call-In Interview 16 November 3-5 PM EST

I’m being interviewed on Saturday, 16 November, by Nick Peters at ‘Deeper Waters.’ If you’ve ever wanted to ask me a question in person and not yet been able to get to a convention or conference where I’ve spoken, here’s your chance for, if not face-to-face contact, then at least ‘real time’ back and forth!

How do you contact ‘Deeper Waters’ to ask your question? Nick writes:

The show will air from 3-5 PM EST on 11/16/2013. The call-in number if you have a question is 714-242-5180. The link can be found here.

I look forward to hearing from you!

New York Times: ‘Child Proofing Harry Potter’

The serious reader who sent me this ‘Child Proofing Harry Potter’ piece that appeared on the Times’ Adventures in Parenting page noted that it may have been written by an internet troll longing to excite literature-mavens-who-blog into a lather of condemnation of what she calls “pink washing” texts. “Pink washing” is the stripping of everything challenging, politically incorrect, or of any depth by changing words as reading aloud or by explanation of what is “really meant.”

The historical terms for this are not “pink washing,’ which is admirable at least in simultaneously being offered as label by the practitioner and being at least as revealing and pejorative as any moniker a critic could have dreamed up, but Bowdlerization and expurgation. Think Adventures of Huckleberry Finn without the word “nigger.”

Yes, I find this sort of thing unfortunate and reprehensible. No, while I see the reader’s point about the troll baiting, I confess I am not tempted to ‘go there’ in terms of righteous condemnation.

Instead of anger at mom what I feel is pity for the child whose imagination is so tightly circumscribed by a mother who is so entrenched in her age appropriate categories and righteous mother protectiveness. And Mother Messina probably deserves my sympathy, too, because of her mental posture and invincible confidence in her parenting control and omniscience vis a vis what is best for child is only evidence of her being thoroughly, even inescapably enmeshed by school-mind.

Mom, in other words, shows all the smug assurance of an ideological Marxist or Christian fundamentalist, albeit here in the professional educator’s mechanical surety of what right things are allowed in a child-student’s head and the exact sequence with which they are allowed entrance. She is forever immunized against the reality of how human beings actually learn and mature because of the Newtonian educational universe in which she imagines herself. Which universe, sadly, because we are all children of our own schooling like it or not, we all inhabit to greater or lesser degrees.

Your comments and corrections, please. A tip of the eHat to John and Eric!

BonFire Night: Thoughts on Guy Fawkes and Harry Potter

The 5th of November is celebrated in Commonwealth Countries as ‘Guy Fawkes Day’ or ‘Bonfire Night,’ in commemoration of the discovery of the Gunpowder Plot in 1605, which discovery prevented Catholic jihadists of that era from blowing King James I and English Parliament heaven ward. Guy Fawkes was the first conspirator arrested and has come to represent the entire affair. Read all about it here.

Why should you as serious readers of Harry Potter and other imaginative fiction care? If you live in the UK, you care because it explains the Fireworks displays tonight, the parades with figures of the Pope, Guy Fawkes, even Margaret Thatcher burning in effigy, and a general rowdy mood in the streets. If you live in the US, well, there are three reasons to care about Guy Fawkes.

(1) There is Fawkes the Phoenix, for one thing. Prof Philip Nel at Kansas State believes — and I think he is right — that Dumbledore’s familiar and the source of the feathers in the doppelganger wand cores is named not for Guy Fawkes but after the Phoenix in E. Nesbit’s ‘Five Children’ stories, especially The Phoenix and the Carpet, whose Phoenix, if memory serves, comes to them on Guy Fawkes Day. And there is the mention in Philosopher’s Stone‘s first chapter; teevee weatherman Jim McGuffin discusses the “downpour of shooting stars” viewers had reported to him. His sage thought on All Saint’s Day? “Perhaps people have been celebrating Bonfire Night a week early — it’s not until next week, folks!” Bonfire Night is another name for Guy Fawkes Day. Perhaps there are other explicit or just beneath the surface references to the Gunpowder Plot in the Saga; please share them in the comment boxes below.

(2) I think there is an implicit reference to the consequences of the Gunpowder Plot that is at least as important as these asides on the story surface. It might be said that the International Statute of Wizarding Secrecy and the life of magical folk out-of-sight of Muggles is a pointer to the place of Catholics and all religious non-conformists in Scotland, England, and Ireland from Queen Elizabeth I to King George III, really until the Catholic Emancipation in 1829. Non-Anglicans, principally Papists but also the many Radical Reformation sects like the Muggletonians, Seekers, and Society of Friends, were officially recusant non-entities, a status that was almost certainly exacerbated and prolonged for a century or more because of the attempt to kill James I.

How much the wizarding world reflects this period of history, I discuss at great length in Harry Potter Smart Talk, but you can read some of that online here: Ms. Rowling’s ‘Real World’ Wizards and Witches: 17th Century Christian-Hermetic Magi ‘Seekers.’ The Gunpowder Plot’s attempted regicide made life a graver trial for non-conformists at the Restoration than it would have been otherwise, hence the Statute of 1689 or ’92 and the disappearance of the hermetic saints and Seekers.

(3) I thought of this magical-Muggle divide (canyon?) today when Alison the Librarian sent me an Umbridge-esque item from a UK blogger, in whose post an imaginary School Superintendent writes up the acceptable practices and numerous failings of the Hogwarts School of Witchcraft and Wizardry in the unmistakeable and pathetic jargon of professional educators everywhere.

I have been reading John Taylor Gatto’s invaluable Underground History of American Education this past week so the comi-tragedy of this piece was especially vivid. Can anyone doubt that Hogwarts’ challenging, hands-on, and practical curriculum must be despised by the teaching bureaucrats Ms Rowling satirizes in Dolores Umbridge? If you do, I hope very much that you’ll read all the essays in the upcoming book from the 2012 St Andrews Harry Potter Conference. I’m guesing your jaws will drop as mine did when one well known children’s literature expert decried without irony that Hogwarts cancelled exams as a form of celebration…

I like to think of Guy Fawkes as a magical figure, then, even a wizard if you will, who, though burned in effigy every year for his attack on the Muggle King, rather enjoys the treatment a la Wendelin the Weird and her Flame Freezing Charm. Would that all magical folk, those with wands and the many more whose lives are focused on pursuit of communion with what is most real, could be protected from persecution by all those caught up in the errors of our age, the witch hunters and teachers all around us.

Happy Bonfire Night!

.

Chestnut Hill Harry Potter Festival: Quidditch, Pub Crawl, Etc.

I love Oklahoma City, but for Potter Punditry I confess to missing Philadelphia. Not only does the City of Brotherly Love have the PotterDelphia Meet-Up group, but it boasts the annual Chestnut Hill Harry Potter Festival. Chestnut Hill College has a full blown Quidditch Tournament as well as an Academic Conference and the village of Chestnut Hill gets into the act with a full two day schedule of Harry Potter events.

The Town-Gown Festival is Friday and Saturday 18-19 October. You can read about it here, here, and here. The Academic Conference at the college  is 18 October from 3-5 pm and you can learn about their speakers and subjects here. As you can tell from the video above, it’s a blast.

PotterDelphians, please send us a report!

Shared Text: Emma Watson Tops ‘Sexiest Stars’ List

The Telegraph reported today that Emma Watson was named the World’s Sexiest  Film Actress. It was their excuse for compiling all their best pictures of the young actress. For the story and the Top Ten list itself, check out the BBC.

I’m putting this news under ‘Shared Text’ for three reasons which I’ll offer as questions or observations:

(1) Without looking it up, name more than one movie in which Emma Watson appears whose title does not begin with the three words ‘Harry Potter and.‘ Draw your own conclusion.

(2) Scarlett Johansson came in second — the woman Esquire has twice named ‘The Sexiest Woman Alive’ — and Jennifer Lawrence was third. Just sayin.’

(3) Scroll through the Watson fashion pictures at the Telegraph compilation. Try not to think of the words ‘cute’ or ‘pixie’ or ‘trying too hard.’  Then read today’s Shoe comic strip:

I have to assume that, no matter how I put this, I will be assumed to be insulting the undeniably talented, intelligent, and attractive Emma Watson. So be it. Let me be brief then with my Shared Text assertion that I think stands without argument.

Except for the Harry Potter film franchise and for her having played the part of Hermione Granger, which character every reader adored on several levels of admiration and identification, no fashion designer or movie director would ever have picked this young woman for a Vogue shoot or a feature film. Hermione Granger won the Sexiest Film Actress award today because voters chose to express their warm feelings for this character.

Go ahead. Tell me how wrong I am.