J. K. Rowling on 10 November 2024, the eve of Armistice Day, elected to go to war with those who insist that she is “far right.”
In a four-paragraph tweet she re-stated her political commitments and core beliefs in something of a manifesto. In brief, she identifies as a “left-leaning liberal,” one who is “fiercely anti-authoritarian,” and a woman who simultaneously “mistrust[s] ideologies” and those captured by their loyalties to same while remaining “an idealist” believing “in human beings” and our natural goodness.
The three most interesting pieces of this twixter declaration to me are (1) the aside vis a vis “anti-authoritarianism” that “if you couldn’t deduce that from my work than you haven’t understood a word of it,” i.e., “my works are transparencies of my core beliefs” (cf. Lake and Shed), (2) her admission that the political left with whom she continues to identify no longer exists but has been replaced by an “identity based strain of politics I consider elitist,” and (3) her insistence that there is “currently an assault on woman’s rights,” one “unparalleled in my lifetime” “coming from both left and right.” This last despite the election of a US President by a profound majority for these times in the popular vote and Electoral College, a candidate who since February 2023 at least has publicly espoused all of Rowling’s TERF war objectives as his platform, not to mention that he is not anti-abortion post Roe but wants UK/EU type limits on infanticide.
That third point suggests she is something of an ideologue herself politically, despite her affirmation that she mistrusts those “who deny a bit of inconvenient truth to keep their world view intact.” And, as for being radically “anti-authoritarian,” Rowling never encountered a Covid interdict and repressive measure that she didn’t applaud and publicly support 2020 to 2024. Can you say “Missing in Action”? There’s quite a bit of willful blindness in these statements, in other words, and my chief take-away is the literary rather than political point that this confusion and mélange of contradictory positions can be “deduced” from a close reading of her work.
The twixter thread beneath the post had some interesting if very cordial push-back on her statement, to which she responded generously and with characteristic good humor: [Read more…]





Recent Conversation