• Rowling Writes “Really Sad Chapter;” Who Dies in Sleep Tight Evangeline?

    [Tweet url; see this for an explanation of the Greene reference; thanks to Kelly Loomis for alerting me to the tweet]

    What’s the appropriate response to this writing update from Rowling?

    The author of the Cormoran Strike mysteries sends out a tweet in which she writes that she has “been writing a really sad chapter that made me cry several times,” a chapter she is satisfied is “as exactly as sad as it needs to be.” The assumption is that she’s still writing the next Strike novel, one she has told her readers has the improbable title, Sleep Tight, Evangeline.

    Reader response seems to be trending toward the death of either Robin or Cormoran, the characters in whose heads we experience each Strike mystery. Kelly raised the point in her note to me that we’ve speculated about Linda Ellacott’s imminent death after pulling on two Rowling Golden Threads (see ‘Lost Mother‘ and ‘Hidden Hold of Horrors‘). Which would be devastating to daughter Robin for a slew of reasons beyond love and affection.

    My first thought is that there’s no explicit mention of death in the tweet. Maybe we shouldn’t go off half-cocked. It could be a break-up in a relationship, a car accident with critical injuries, or a natural disaster that destroys someone’s home.

    But to be “really sad,” I agree, points to the death of a spouse or lover, a parent, or of a child, from miscarriage to accident (I’m thinking of Jack, Strike’s beloved nephew). Divorce is heavy, certainly, but I don’t think Rowling would be brought to tears by it or call it “really sad.”

    She has deployed, though, the Graham Greene quotation about writers having a “splinter of ice” in their hearts previously and only, if memory serves, in reference to characters she has killed. That’s an implicit reference to the oncoming death of a major Strike character or of one that would make Strike or Robin “really sad,” pain we would feel in cathartic sympathy.

    How about a look at deaths that would be earth shaking and tear-jerking? Let’s start with the story lead characters —

    Rowling tweeted the ‘Psyche Ascendant’ painting after Hallmarked Man‘s publication, which, though it was meant to lift up the hearts of readers disappointed by Strike 8, sure had an alarming message. It seems to cue up Robin’s death in Sleep Tight, Evangeline. Robin’s had so many Near Death Experiences, it almost seems overdue; mythologically, psyche-ologically, and in light of the frequent foreshadowing in Strike’s repeated alarmed pleas to her to be more careful and declarations of his sure destruction by guilt if she dies on the job, we’re set up for her funeral.

    Strike’s death, of course, would end the ‘Cormoran Strike Novel’ series as such, even if he haunts Strike 10 (as he surely would). That would be a grand twist, but I’m not seeing it, even if Robin takes the helm, Cordelia Gray style, in the closer to solve the mystery of her partner’s demise.

    If Nephew Jack dies in Strike 9, that lines up, as noted, as a death that would fall under “really sad.” If that is in the cards, I’d guess it happens in the finale (and, based on ring correspondences and the relevant fairy tale, that Jack will more likely be responsible somehow for Uncle Cormoran’s death than die himself [by falling off the Beanstalk?]).

    We know that Robin’s father is not well. If he dies, perhaps Linda dies soon after from complications of grief — or immediately after from shock — or alongside him in a car accident they have when he suffers another heart attack, this time while driving.

    Or maybe Linda dies all on her own and Michael is left behind to grieve — and to share with Robin how much her daughter’s anger and neglect had broken Linda’s heart? What a hit that would be, especially if Mum dies of a heart attack. This, as noted, checks several Rowling Lake and Golden Thread boxes.

    Those are my only “really sad” deaths.

    Under just “sad” I’d list Lucy, Dave Polworth, people working at the Agency (Pat!), RFM, Matt (not Sarah?), the Rocking Prune, Strike’s half-siblings, his close friends the Herberts — Ilsa, Nick, and their son Benjamin…

    Of course if Ilsa and Nick died in a car accident we’d have something of a connection with the ending of The Silkworm (Robin drives Nick’s father’s taxi into a building with Elizabeth Tassel in tow) and the Agency partners, as Benjamin’s godparents, might have responsibilities for the orphan. Orphans are “really sad” especially at the parents’ funeral — and Robin forced into the role of mother and Strike as father suddenly, that would be a delightful plot twist, no? Joined together as professional partners and live-in parents but not by marriage?

    Whose “really sad” departure or what possible plot event that could move Rowling to tears am I missing? Why do you think Rowling felt the need to share this bit of news? Please share your thoughts in the comment boxes below!

  • Rowling Tweets About Congenital Blood Condition: von Willebrand Disease

    [Tweet url here and here: Hat Tip to Kelly Loomis!]

    Rowling had the above twixter conversation with journalist and friend Janet Murray (no known relation to husband Neil Murray) about both women’s struggles to maintain iron levels in their blood. Rowling mentions as an aside her being “diagnosed with von Willebrand’s disease” (VWD) by a haemotologist. VWD is “the most common hereditary coagulopathy in humans, affecting 1% of the population” per Wikipedia.

    This was not a revelation, though her discussion of her daily concern with absorbing iron certainly was (imagine writing the haemotologist Roy Phipps scenes in Troubled Blood while surviving on a diet of 90% kale…). She had tweeted about being “born with a bleeding disorder” in December 2025 and Nick Jeffery noted at the time that it was probably VWD because of its prevalence in the population and its appearance in Strike 5. Rowling’s 9/11 tweet confirmed Nick’s Best Guess.

    Nick went on from his first post to catalogue in his ‘The Troubled Blood of J. K. Rowling‘ the Blood Golden Thread’s appearances and meaning throughout Rowling’s work. That brilliant exposition was followed up by a Rowling Studies conversation on the same subject, ‘Blood: The Crimson Thread.’ If you were unaware of that strand or commonplace in nearly everything Rowling has written, it’s a fascinating study in the intersection of Rowling’s biographical Lake inspiration and her Shed artistry by which she elevates blood to a social, psychological, and spiritual metaphor.

    I confess, though, I’m most interested in Rowling’s ideas about blood because of a twitter header she posted when writing Troubled Blood: Read More “Rowling Tweets About Congenital Blood Condition: von Willebrand Disease”

  • Rowling Twitter Header: Freud’s Desk

    Rowling’s Twitter page header is going through some turnover. Last week we were treated to a statue of Robert Raikes:

    Read about that at Farting Sofa. Yesterday? A picture of Freud’s desk at the Freud Museum in London:

    New picture, new cameo, the latter with The Presence sporting some new Potter-esque specs — or are the round glasses and pensive look a pointer to the round glasses on Freud’s desk and the couch in his office? Is that the look of a Freudian analyst or analysand?

    That’s one crowded desk. You can read about the desk and a few of its pieces here, again from the Freud Museum. A clearer shot of the statuettes he looked to for inspiration while writing and speaking with patients:

    There’s been a book written about this Garden of Idols in miniature.  The video produced for the book launch has an even better view of the desk top collection:

    I’m really not into the Twitter header Hunt-for-Clues game. It’s an over-crowded field and, frankly, it’s a little demeaning to be salivating and meditating over each new breadcrumb that Rowling-Galbraith has dropped from her table in playful fan servicing.

    That being said, here are my obligatory three thoughts, oblivious to what fandom has already revealed about Rowling’s relationship with the desk. I ask your forgiveness in advance for my cluelessness if the Twitterati among Serious Strikers have already broken the code on this header.

    First, in that menagerie of gods, goddesses, and jade Chinese screens, there is a lot of Eros, seven statues if you’re counting. Venus rates another four. One might think that Freud was a Jungian (ho!) or upset the Jungians by noting that Carl was certainly a Freudian, albeit one one in-recovery for the greater part of his life.

    Second, the obvious idea about Freud’s desk appearing in the inter librum period before Strike 9 is that we’re going to make a trip to the Freud Museum sometime in Sleep Tight, Evangeline (it’s in London) or meet a Freudian. Pretty clear candidate for that, right?

    Ever since the publication of Hallmarked Man in which Robin asks Prudence to recommend a psychologist for help with her disintegrating mental state, it’s been my working assumption that Dr Donleavey, a Jungian analyst, recommended another Jungian analyst. Maybe she didn’t. Maybe the full-spectrum Prudence urged Robin to consult with a Freudian psychoanalyst. The swearing makes sense if that’s the case as well as the direct approach Prudence says she’s noted for.

    Third and last, why the quick turnover in Twitter headers? I have no idea. Well, that’s not true; I have an idea but it’s pretty silly.

    Louise Freeman Davis concluded a post early yesterday with the note, “Wouldn’t it be cool if Dr. Broccoli is a Jungian like Prudence and actually talks with Robin about alchemy?” I commented, “I share your hope that Robin’s analyst ‘goes there’ in Strike 9.” And almost instantly Rowling posted the picture of Freud’s desk.

    Correlation meaning causation, voila, cause and effect: Rowling wanted us to know that we were way off track and moved her posting of Freud’s desk up on her marketing-breadcrumb-posting queue to send the message post haste.

    I suspect that Rowling may have posted the new header before I was sent word about it (5 PM US Eastern Time) which of course would blow up any possibility that my absurd conjecture, whose premises include one about Team Rowling following Strike fandom postings closely, is true. But it was a seeming fun-coincidence synchronicity.

    Analyze all that, please, in the comment boxes below.

  • Rowling Tweets Status of ‘Sleep Tight, Evangeline:’ Sixty Percent of First Draft

    Url to Thread

    Three quick notes about this news!

    1. If 72 chapters is approximately 60% of Sleep Tight, Evangeline, then we’re looking at another 120 chapter book. At best, those migraines not reflecting a brain tumor or even a chronic condition, Strike 9 won’t be with us until late in 2027. That she is writing and enjoying the process, however, means the intense planning of this entry in a series of intricately structured novels is over and she is in the hard-slog of writing business. Fair winds, etc.
    2. Check out the Rowling tweet on the thread of which the Serious Striker thought it appropriate (and apparently Rowling agreed!) to ask about the fictional work in progress. Maybe her posts about government ineptitude and party politics are the secret passage to ask The Presence questions about her work? Those of you who enjoy life on social media, please ask her about the ten book series structure, the alchemical sequence, or whether the allegory of Cormoran and Robin is Cupid-Psyche mythic template, Jungian archetypal psychology, or Shakespearean romance.
    3. “After a mere seven years, Strike is finally in open pursuit.” One of the speculative ideas about Evangeline has been that Robin will be disappearing from Strike’s life for much of the novel via a kidnapping or a retreat to work with the Cursing Crone Psychologist (a la Psyche’s trip to see Persephone at Venus’ bidding). If Strike is at last “in open pursuit” of winning Robin’s hand in marriage, that suggests that, no, Robin will be center stage in Strike 9. Doesn’t it?

    Let me know how you read these migraine inspired bon mots to her followers on Twixter!

  • Rowling’s Sarcasm about ‘Assisted Dying’ (Medical Murder) Escapes Fans

    Url to Tweet Above

    A casual reading of Rowling’s tweet this morning about the “legalisation of assisted suicide” suggests that she is in favor of making into law the suspension of the Hippocratic Oath‘s prohibition of a doctor’s killing a patient intentionally:

    I will use those dietary regimens which will benefit my patients according to my greatest ability and judgment, and I will do no harm or injustice to them. Neither will I administer a poison to anybody when asked to do so, nor will I suggest such a course. Similarly I will not give to a woman a pessary to cause abortion. But I will keep pure and holy both my life and my art. I will not use the knife, not even, verily, on sufferers from stone, but I will give place to such as are craftsmen therein.

    This is sadly a credible reading because Rowling has expressed several times her support for laws allowing pre-natal infanticide, a murder of the innocent expressly forbidden in the Oath. Regardless of its credibility, the great majority of Rowling’s 13.8 million twixter followers who responded were appalled by her seeming support of said “legalisation” (see here, here, here, and here) and more than one celebrated it (see here and here).

    Both reactions misread her tweet. It is a sarcastic response to the assertion that killing someone is a “choice” equivalent to “gay marriage” rather than an irreversible ending of human life, one that is much too often the result of coercion and manipulation rather than free and rational choice.

    How do we know this for sure? First, because Rowling has tweeted previously her position against “assisted dying.”

    Second, we know that she isn’t pro “assisted dying” because Rowling finally felt obliged to spell it out:

    Nick Jeffery and I discussed the tweets and the several others Rowling posted in the wake of the assassination of Charlie Kirk. You can find that conversation about perhaps the most meaningful and personal tweets Rowling has made about her beliefs over at the Hogwarts Professor Substack site: Hallmarked Man and Rowling’s Tweets after the Shooting of Charlie Kirk: The Four Definitions, the Fixed Beliefs She has Given Up, Her Doubts about “Religious Faith” in God, and the Evisceration of Emma Watson.