“Hey, Peeta! How About We Go to the Park to Play with Pods?”

No joke! Lionsgate is entertaining proposals for a Hunger Games theme park.

Think of all the fun the whole family can enjoy! There will be a ‘Kill or Be Killed’ roller coaster ride from whose cars park patrons can throw one another (the ride won’t stop so long as there are two people remaining). Vendors are lining up already to offer neon colored varieties of Haymitch’s Hooch. And Games Makers around the globe are designing murderous Pods that guests will be able to walk through, though everyone around them on the green screen walls and ceiling will suffer terrible, torturous deaths.

What. A. Blast.

From the beginning of the Hunger Games film franchise, we’ve noted here again and again and again and again that a series of novels depicting and decrying the excesses of violence and voyeuristic pleasure we have in our screened media, if turned into block buster movies, was inevitably going to be self-satirizing.

The hyper marketing of the films via internet publicity, however, the casting of the glamorous and sex symbol Jennifer Lawrence as Katniss Everdeen, and the commercialization of items meant to be despised by book readers, not to mention the hijacking of the anti-Games Maker message of the book in the first film, have overshot our cynical expectations by a District 12 mile.

Please share your idea for Humger Games Land, the theme park, below. I’m afraid your most sarcastic visions will fall short of the real thing should it ever come to pass.

Hat tip to James for this news item!

BonFire Night: Thoughts on Guy Fawkes and Harry Potter

The 5th of November is celebrated in Commonwealth Countries as ‘Guy Fawkes Day’ or ‘Bonfire Night,’ in commemoration of the discovery of the Gunpowder Plot in 1605, which discovery prevented Catholic jihadists of that era from blowing King James I and English Parliament heaven ward. Guy Fawkes was the first conspirator arrested and has come to represent the entire affair. Read all about it here.

Why should you as serious readers of Harry Potter and other imaginative fiction care? If you live in the UK, you care because it explains the Fireworks displays tonight, the parades with figures of the Pope, Guy Fawkes, even Margaret Thatcher burning in effigy, and a general rowdy mood in the streets. If you live in the US, well, there are three reasons to care about Guy Fawkes.

(1) There is Fawkes the Phoenix, for one thing. Prof Philip Nel at Kansas State believes — and I think he is right — that Dumbledore’s familiar and the source of the feathers in the doppelganger wand cores is named not for Guy Fawkes but after the Phoenix in E. Nesbit’s ‘Five Children’ stories, especially The Phoenix and the Carpet, whose Phoenix, if memory serves, comes to them on Guy Fawkes Day. And there is the mention in Philosopher’s Stone‘s first chapter; teevee weatherman Jim McGuffin discusses the “downpour of shooting stars” viewers had reported to him. His sage thought on All Saint’s Day? “Perhaps people have been celebrating Bonfire Night a week early — it’s not until next week, folks!” Bonfire Night is another name for Guy Fawkes Day. Perhaps there are other explicit or just beneath the surface references to the Gunpowder Plot in the Saga; please share them in the comment boxes below.

(2) I think there is an implicit reference to the consequences of the Gunpowder Plot that is at least as important as these asides on the story surface. It might be said that the International Statute of Wizarding Secrecy and the life of magical folk out-of-sight of Muggles is a pointer to the place of Catholics and all religious non-conformists in Scotland, England, and Ireland from Queen Elizabeth I to King George III, really until the Catholic Emancipation in 1829. Non-Anglicans, principally Papists but also the many Radical Reformation sects like the Muggletonians, Seekers, and Society of Friends, were officially recusant non-entities, a status that was almost certainly exacerbated and prolonged for a century or more because of the attempt to kill James I.

How much the wizarding world reflects this period of history, I discuss at great length in Harry Potter Smart Talk, but you can read some of that online here: ‘Ms. Rowling’s ‘Real World’ Wizards and Witches: 17th Century Christian-Hermetic Magi ‘Seekers.’ The Gunpowder Plot’s attempted regicide made life a graver trial for non-conformists at the Restoration than it would have been otherwise, hence the Statute of 1689 or ’92 and the disappearance of the hermetic saints and Seekers.

(3) I thought of this magical-Muggle divide (canyon?) today when Alison the Librarian sent me an Umbridge-esque item from a UK blogger, in whose post an imaginary School Superintendent writes up the acceptable practices and numerous failings of the Hogwarts School of Witchcraft and Wizardry in the unmistakeable and pathetic jargon of professional educators everywhere.

I have been reading John Taylor Gatto’s invaluable Underground History of American Education this past week so the comi-tragedy of this piece was especially vivid. Can anyone doubt that Hogwarts’ challenging, hands-on, and practical curriculum must be despised by the teaching bureaucrats Ms Rowling satirizes in Dolores Umbridge? If you do, I hope very much that you’ll read all the essays in the upcoming book from the 2012 St Andrews Harry Potter Conference. I’m guesing your jaws will drop as mine did when one well known children’s literature expert decried without irony that Hogwarts cancelled exams as a form of celebration…

I like to think of Guy Fawkes as a magical figure, then, even a wizard if you will, who, though burned in effigy every year for his attack on the Muggle King, rather enjoys the treatment a la Wendelin the Weird and her Flame Freezing Charm. Would that all magical folk, those with wands and the many more whose lives are focused on pursuit of communion with what is most real, could be protected from persecution by all those caught up in the errors of our age, the witch hunters and teachers all around us.

Happy Bonfire Night!

.

Veronica Roth Responds to Fandom Anger about Allegiant

I confess I’ve never sen anything like it, though I’ve never met or known of an author quite as open as Veronica Roth, whose Divergent trilogy closed last month with a novel, Allegiant, that disappointed many of her fans. As in, they-sent-death-threats disappointment. We’re pretty serious at HogwartsProfessor about all things Divergent, so let’s take a closer look at four of the points she makes in her blog post ‘About the End of Allegiant.‘

And, yes, if you make the jump, the discussion will be, surprise!, about the end of Allegiant. If you haven’t read it yet — and what’s up with that? — and don’t want to be spoiled, scroll down and re-read some other non-Divergent posts, right? [Read more…]

Help ‘MuggleNet Academia’ Win a 2013 Podcast Award!

A Message from Keith Hawk, Host and Producer of ‘MuggleNet Academia,’ the Podcast for Serious Readers of Harry Potter:

Hello, HogwartsProfessor — MuggleNetAcademia Family!

I am incredibly honored to announce that MuggleNet Academia, featuring John Granger, the Hogwarts Professor, has received a nomination for the 2013 Podcast Awards in the category of Education. This is all due to what John and the guests of our show have brought to the discussion table and the fans are rewarding us with this nomination.

I would like nothing more than for MNet Academia to be announced as the winner for this award, but to do that, we have to beat some very good podcast competition in our category. I will need ALL of you to help with this by not only casting your votes, but helping to spread the word just like you have when you’ve heard a program that you really liked. i.e., Tweet, Like, Blog, Message all about the award nomination and how to vote.

The MuggleNet Podcast Family has been nominated in 4 categories, so while you are voting for the MuggleNet Academia show, I would like to ask that you also cast your vote for our other shows:

  • Alohomora! – People’s Choice and Entertainment Categories
  • Hogwarts Radio – Best Produced Category
  • MuggleNet Academia – Education Category

Guest Post: The Christlike Sacrificial Deaths of Tris and Harry

Tris the Christlike? A comparison of some Christlike qualities of Tris Prior and Harry Potter

Isaiah Mary Molano, OP

Many of my fellow Hogpro fans are disappointed with Allegiant. However, Veronica Roth’s work is not in vain. I would propose that we peer into the Tris of the last 20 pages and see that there is a solid attempt to insist that Tris is a Christlike character. I would like to propose to compare and contrast this with the Harry’s ending in the Dark Forest and see how the two Christlike scenes come off each other.

Now, short review session. To my knowledge, when it comes the Christlike arcs in both stories, the common three sections seem to follow: (1) an act of self-sacrifice, (2) a resurrection scene, and (3) a demonstration of a change of character of a deeper knowledge of a theme of the overall work. (Self-sacrifice is almost always motivated by love for another, a freely made decision to die for another for their sakes without caring about the costs of self.)

Any Harry Potter fanatic worth a box of every-flavor beans would have the images of Harry’s death scene engraved in their minds. Harry explicitly knows what he is doing. He puts on his cloak and intentionally avoids people that will take him away from his sacrificial act. He avoids Ron and Hermoine, he thinks of Ginny, he avoids the Order. The only person he does talk to his Neville, and it was for a perfectly sensible reason and Neville would not have had the power to persuade Harry from his sacrificial act.

While he is dead, he has a vision with Dumbledore, who himself is angelic. They discuss the deeper themes of the entire saga—love, sacrifice, death, even the quest for immortality. And when Harry is resurrected, he has knowledge that will propel him to defeat Voldemort in a profound way. In a sense, it is not the Elder Wand that saves Harry and destroys Voldemort. Rather, it is Harry’s experiential knowledge, and Voldemort’s ignorance, of love and sacrifice that saves the day. Harry’s deep knowledge of love and sacrifice saves himself and Hogwarts and all his loves. And it is this very knowledge that destroys Lord Voldemort.

While in the King’s-Cross-of-Harry’s-mind, he obtains this knowledge in its fullness and can come back to his friends and save them via the very same magic that saved him 16 years prior.

In comparison and contrast, we have Tris Prior of the Divergent series. I think we’ve all lost our breath when Tris said, “Caleb, give me the backpack.” We’ve all fallen in love with this spontaneous girl, and all knew exactly what she was going to do. And I would bet that we all had the same reaction. And moreover, when she said, “Tell Tobias that I didn’t want to leave him,” you can have one of two reactions—tears or anger—and I was angry. Like Harry, she had only one message before she went to her death, and it was given to someone she knew that could not persuade her to change her mind. She even rationalizes that perhaps she can survive the death serum. She thinks of Tobias, and her parents and Christina. And she sacrifices her life for the sake of her city—a community whom she loves (even the Erudite), a community in which a grave injustice is being done.

However, when she passes through her veil of death the first time, she stands up and accidentally faces her accuser, her Satan figure—David. She is changed—insofar that she discovers that she, like David, is immune to the death serum. She discovers (to David’s ignorance in a nice twist of irony) that she has perfect genes, the perfect immune system—a superwoman whose genes ought to be preserved in perpetuity.

Though she goes through the veil of death serum, she falls onto the floor, and rises, on the other side. Yet unlike in the formulaic Christ arcs, she does not come away changed (in a human, immaterial sort of way) and she eventually dies again, never to return. Unlike Christ, who promises to come back after he has ascended, we do not know where Tris goes.

She does not obtain deeper knowledge. Harry learns how to be selfless and sacrificial. Through his sufferings, psychological, emotional and physical, he learns compassion and unconditional love. After her “resurrection” she learns that David loved Natalie. She learns that Natalie knew that she willingly died for the sake of her son and daughter. Yet she doesn’t learn deeper. She simply learns more.

Moreover, I think that Harry’s deeper learning of compassion and unconditional love weighs more potently upon the reader. We fall in love with Sirius and Hedwig and Fred in ways that we cannot love Will and Albert and Uriah. Rowling gave us those quiet moments in which we can laugh with Sirius and Fred, those times in which we wished we were feeding Hedwig. I suggest that we do not get the same quiet times with Will, Albert and Uriah simply because of Tris’ frenetic and short life.

Tris Prior is almost a Christ character. I think the mechanics of the Divergent world hinders the possibility for her to be a Christ character in the fullest sense. The trilogy lives in a world in which personality is reduced, and is caused by, material genes. In other words, Tris having a conversation with Natalie on the train, in which Tris asks if their conversation is real or inside her head, doesn’t seems to fit the concept of the Divergent world. Tris’ world is too materialistic, it seems, to allow immateriality to reside.

We come really close to allowing Tris to be a Christlike character. It’s just that she doesn’t seem to have acquired deeper knowledge of love and sacrifice. But then again, all Christians are called to be Christlike characters in our own stories, and repeatedly fail. And perhaps, that is part of the point.