Louise Penny: Chief Inspector Gamache

During the ‘Learn to Read Like a Writer’ first semesters of my MFA studies at Oklahoma City University, my tutor, novelist Lou Berney, recommended I read Louise Penny‘s Bury Your Dead for an experience of properly intensive planning. I had never heard of Penny or her procedural mystery hero, Chief Inspector Gamache, and not even Berney’s clues that I was in for a shock prepared me for the incredulity I felt at the end of that book.

No, I won’t spoil the surprise for you — beyond saying Bury Your Dead is the seventh of Penny’s Gamache or ‘Three Pines’ murder mysteries and you’ll get much more out of #7 if you’ve read #6.

My son Zossima lives in Oklahoma City and stops by several times a week to do his laundry, cook with his mother, and borrow some books from my library (I know he actually gets most of his books from the OKC Metropolitan Library downtown but I’m glad he comes in to ask me if I have a copy of Kate Atkinson’s latest or whatever). He told me several weeks ago that he needed to read Agatha Christie; “What one book do you recommend?” I gave him The Murder of Roger Ackroyd.

He’s a novelist and a very serious reader who has been ‘reading like a writer reads’ almost as long as he has been reading. Still, I felt a little bit like Lou Berney may have felt in assigning Bury Your Dead as a book I had to review; I knew Zossima’s head was going to explode at the twist in the last pages of Roger Akroyd. I was also elated because at last I knew what to get him for the Feast of Theophany, our family’s gift-giving holiday. I ordered a copy of Pierre Bayard’s Who killed Roger Ackroyd? : the mystery behind the Agatha Christie mystery to give him when he returned the Christie title to my shelf.

Why?

Because as head-spinning as the end of Christie’s Ackroyd is, Bayard, a French psychoanalyst and literary critic, argues persuasively that the murderer who Poirot reveals at the end of that novel didn’t do it — and that Christie must have been disappointed that none of her readers understood what Poirot was up to in pinning the crime on the wrong person. [Bayard did this with Conan Doyle, too, in Sherlock Holmes Was Wrong: Reopening the Case of The Hound of the Baskervilles.]

I’ll leave it to you to figure out why that gift giving made me think of Louise Penny’s Bury Your Dead. I spent my monthly book allowance on a Theophany present for myself: a lot of the first twelve Chief Inspector Gamache procedurals I found on eBay and a special one volume edition of The Brutal Telling and Bury Your Dead. I’m guessing that Zossima will be interested in reading that once he finishes the Bayard.

I bring that up because (1) if, like me, you are not aware of Louise Penny, whose most recent Gamache, #19, is currently atop the fiction best seller list in Canada, you’re in for a treat, (2) I’ll be writing, I hope, about the twist I think we’re being set up for a la Bury Your Dead in Hallmarked Man, and (3) my initial foray into Penny’s books leads me to think they are largely about loss as the key element in human existence. “Loss” is a near constant in Rowling’s descriptions of what her latest book is about.

I finished Still Life yesterday and am well into A Fatal Grace today. More anon!

New Dan Brown Novel Due September 9 New Hunger Games Prequel on March 18

Two days after Western Christmas last year, Nick Jeffery revealed here that Amazon had posted the release date for The Hallmarked Man as September 9, 2025, for the hardcover, large print, Kindle, and Audible editions. There has been no confirmation, however, from Team Rowling or Mulholland Books that this is the date and we still do not have a cover. The Amazon date is a big deal because they are the goliath of book-sellers, but nothing is sure, I guess, until we have the book in hand.

So what?

It was announced today that Dan Brown’s new novel, The Secret of Secrets, will be published on September 9th this year and the global fandom of the Robert Langdon series was treated to that book’s cover. Read the People magazine story, ‘Dan Brown Announces New Book, The Secret of Secrets: ‘Most Ambitious Novel to Date,’ if you’re one of those fans. If you’re curious about that author’s ‘Lake and Shed’ equivalents, read the ‘secret of secrets’ behind Dan Brown’s success writing blockbuster novels at Godspy’s ‘My Lunch with an Old Friend of Dan Brown Proves Revealing About The DaVinci Code.’ Secret of Secrets is the sixth Robert Langdon novel, with The Da Vinci Code ranked #11 on the list of all-time best-selling novels and the first five books tied at #9 for best-selling series with more than 200 million copies sold.

Harry Potter is #1 on that list — but the Strike-Ellacott mysteries are not on the list at all and it stretches down to series that have only sold 15 million copies (in case you’re curious, there are 127 series listed). I suspect this may just be a function of the publisher or the author not wanting sales to be public knowledge, but, still, a novel from Dan Brown and Robert Galbraith on the same day? That’s either a bonanza for retail booksellers or a ginormous gaffe.

I do look forward to Hallmarked Man but I confess I’m more excited now about Suzanne Collins’ latest Hunger Games prequel, Sunrise on the Reaping. (Again, for the curious, the Hunger Games series’ four books have sold over 100 million copies and are #30 on the Wikipedia all-time list.) It will feature the Second Quarter Quell, the Games in which Haymitch features as the ‘winning’ District 12 tribute. I have argued since the run-up to Mockingjay’s publication in 2010 that Haymitch and the Donner sisters are the ‘Hidden Key’ to the original series, a story that couldn’t be told inside the Katniss Everdeen trilogy.

We’ll be talking about that theory from fifteen years ago in the weeks before the publication of Sunrise on the Reaping on March 18th, as well as the remarkable quotation from philosopher David Hume that Collins says was her inspiration for this story. It will be the perfect ‘Real or Not Real?’ warm-up for Rowling-Galbraith’s latest given her focus with Collins on the ‘real’ versus ‘what’s in my head.’

Rowling Tweets About Former ‘Friends:’ ‘It’s Not Paranoia to Think I Hate You’

I have read several reviews online of the history of Rowling’s conflict with Gender Theory ideologues, whom she refers to as “fundamentalists.” One common point they share is to offer the views of the Harry Potter film franchises’ actors and actresses who came out against the author’s views as a kind of counter-weight, as if those voices balanced out Rowling’s supposed “transphobia.” Rowling has not responded to the criticism of those thespians, but she has been absent from public events and filmed reunions in which they were featured players.

Last week, in an exchange with dancer Rosie Kay on Twixter, Rowling made it fairly clear that she despises those she feels betrayed her at a time when she was being piled on by all the usual suspects. It seems that there won’t be any reconciliation or cameos on the HBO+ adaptations of the Potter books.

To understand Rowling’s comments to Kay, it helps to know the dancer’s tweet, in which she struggled to “deal with feelings of betrayal.”

 

The “small business” she refers to, I think, is the Rosie Kay Dance Company, of which she was the founder, choreographer, and principal. It’s website no longer exists though its pages can be found on the Wayback Machine. It may have been “small,” but it was a rising cultural landmark. It disappeared when Kay was forced to resign from her positions at her company after complaints were made by some of her dancers to the board. They felt she needed to be canceled because of her “transphobic” opinions, in essence, that she thought men and women are different. You can read the long painful story of her resignation in the face of this usurping of place here, here, here, and here.

A July 2022 profile in The Times shared how much Rowling’s support meant to Kay at the time of her cancellation: [Read more…]

Marathon Movie Madness for Muggles: February Features First Four Films

It’s a commonplace when old fans meet more recent Potter-philes that the one group says, “You can’t imagine what it was like not knowing how it ended, waiting on each new book…” The newbies are usually very polite about the smugness; I hope the old hands are as courteous when the readers “who didn’t have to wait” come up with insights that no one has noticed until now.

Believe me, it happens. I have a new friend to whom I am impatiently waiting to introduce you whose understanding of the theological underpinning of Harry Potter startled me, a feeling of “How did I miss that?” I haven’t had since reading chapter four of Beatrice Groves’ Literary Allusion in Harry Potter.

I thought of the differences between the four generations of Potter Pundits this morning when I learned that Warner Brothers will be re-releasing the first four adaptations of the Hogwarts Saga novels in February for experiencing on the Big Screen. From Collider:

Get ready to dust off your wands and step back into the Wizarding World, because the first four Harry Potter films are set to return to theaters nationwide in 2025, offering fans a chance to experience the magic on the big screen once again. But this time, there’s a special dusting of magic, as select screenings will be available in immersive formats like 3D and 4DX, bringing the beloved fantasy franchise to new formats but to the same audiences who have loved them for years.

Fathom Events is taking charge of a re-release, along with Warner Bros., to bring Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s StoneHarry Potter and the Chamber of SecretsHarry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban, and Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire back to multiplexes, starting on February 13, 2025. After that, the movies will be shown sequentially over three consecutive weekends, running from Thursdays through Sundays, and it will also mark the 20th anniversary of Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire, which originally premiered in 2005.

So, this is how it will work. At the end of February, every Thursday from the 13th forward will be a showing of Sorcerer’s Stone, every Friday Chamber of Secrets, every Saturday Prisoner of Azkaban, and every Sunday Goblet of Fire, the last Saturday and Sunday being in March. There will be three run-throughs of the first four films, which, if you’re loaded with Galleons, you can catch three times each or any variety of different ways (the one thing you cannot do is watch Goblet on the first Sunday and then catch the films in reverse order back to Stone, which would be a Time Turner trick of sorts).

For fans that are giving this a big yawn, the studio is introducing new big screen formats that weren’t available 2000 to 2005 when these films were first released.

I’m not a big fan of the adaptations. I suspect, though, that I may go with some friends to watch these new releases, if only to talk about where we were when we first saw each. Yes, it’s fan servicing and a money-grab that has next to nothing to do with Goblet’s twentieth anniversary (do people really observe those kinds of dates for movies?). It could nonetheless be an occasion for some great story-telling across fandom generations. I’d love to read if you might be going to one of these new releases in the comment boxes.

Rowling Posts New Twitter Header, Strike Fandom Identifies, Strike9 to be in York

Rowling posted a new twixter home page photo and cameo yesterday and Strike fandom was all over it in a heartbeat. Ludicrous Moniker and Badly Wired Lamp identified it as the Minster in York:

Ludicrous Moniker recalled that a page of a York guidebook was posted on the Robert Galbraith website:

The question was raised during discovery about whether York would be featured in The Hallmarked Man or the as yet untitled Strike 9. Rowling was listening in, apparently, and answered the question:

Hats off to Ludicrous Moniker and the other Serious Strikers on Twixter for tracking this down and for prompting that helpful response from Rowling-Galbraith!

For the complete catalog of Rowling’s twixter homepage pictures compiled by Nick Jeffery with helpful information about the readers who identified each and links to discussion online of what they mean, see ‘All J. K. Rowling’s Twitter Headers.’