Rowling Makes Political Declaration: “Left-Leaning Liberal, Anti-Authoritarian, Anti-Ideology, and Fervent Idealist”

J. K. Rowling on 10 November 2024, the eve of Armistice Day, elected to go to war with those who insist that she is “far right.”

In a four-paragraph tweet she re-stated her political commitments and core beliefs in something of a manifesto. In brief, she identifies as a “left-leaning liberal,” one who is “fiercely anti-authoritarian,” and a woman who simultaneously “mistrust[s] ideologies” and those captured by their loyalties to same while remaining “an idealist” believing “in human beings” and our natural goodness.

The three most interesting pieces of this twixter declaration to me are (1) the aside vis a vis “anti-authoritarianism” that “if you couldn’t deduce that from my work than you haven’t understood a word of it,” i.e., “my works are transparencies of my core beliefs” (cf. Lake and Shed), (2) her admission that the political left with whom she continues to identify no longer exists but has been replaced by an “identity based strain of politics I consider elitist,” and (3) her insistence that there is “currently an assault on woman’s rights,” one “unparalleled in my lifetime” “coming from both left and right.” This last despite the election of a US President by a profound majority for these times in the popular vote and Electoral College, a candidate who since February 2023 at least has publicly espoused all of Rowling’s TERF war objectives as his platform, not to mention that he is not anti-abortion post Roe but wants UK/EU type limits on infanticide.

That third point suggests she is something of an ideologue herself politically, despite her affirmation that she mistrusts those “who deny a bit of inconvenient truth to keep their world view intact.” And, as for being radically “anti-authoritarian,” Rowling never encountered a Covid interdict and repressive measure that she didn’t applaud and publicly support 2020 to 2024. Can you say “Missing in Action”? There’s quite a bit of willful blindness in these statements, in other words, and my chief take-away is the literary rather than political point that this confusion and mélange of contradictory positions can be “deduced” from a close reading of her work.

The twixter thread beneath the post had some interesting if very cordial push-back on her statement, to which she responded generously and with characteristic good humor: [Read more…]

Sunday Potter Quiz: The Knight Bus

Harry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban, Chapter 3: The Knight Bus

1. What color is the Knight Bus?
2. True or False? Harry gave the false name Vernon Dudley to the Knight Bus conductor.
3. Where did the witch Madame Marsh get off of the Knight Bus?
4. What was the title of the Daily Prophet article concerning Sirius Black that Stan Shunpike was reading?
5. The full name of the Knight Bus’ driver is what?
6. Where did Harry ask to be taken by the Knight Bus, and where did they drop him off?
7. Who met Harry outside the Leaky Cauldron?
8. Which Wizarding Decree did Harry tell the Minister he broke?
9. True or False? Hedwig was waiting for Harry with Cornelius Fudge.
10. To what number room of the Leaky Cauldron was Harry guided by Tom the Innkeeper?

For Your Reflection: Of all Harry’s journeys from Privet Drive to the Wizarding World, the one he takes on the Knight Bus in Prisoner of Azkaban is perhaps the most exciting and surprising. Harry is convinced at the chapter’s start that he must run from the Powers that Be who will be coming to get his wand and winds up, after a wild ride on one of Rowling’s funniest magical Muggle-Equivalencies, being lauded and reassured by the Minister of Magic himself. The chapter can be read, in fact, as a telescoped version of the heroes journey Harry takes in the whole Prisoner novel. Compare and contrast the Cornelius Fudge of this chapter with the one at Hogwarts at story’s end and his comments about escaped criminals in both.

Answers: 1. Violently purple (33); 2. False. He told him it was Neville Longbottom (34); 3. Abergavenny (36); 4. Black Still at Large ( 37); 5. Ernie Prang (35); 6. Diagon Alley and The Leaky Cauldron(41); 7. Cornelius Fudge (42); 8. The Decree for the Restriction of Underage Sorcery (45); 9. False. She was waiting for him in his new room (47); 10. Number 11 (46).

Flash from the Past: SNL Blasts Rowling as Transphobe and Anti-Semite (2020)

They can’t pronounce her name, they produce zero evidence that she is “transphobic,” and they revel in the meme that the Gringotts Goblins are shameless representations as Jewish bankers (see ‘Rowling’s Goblin Problem?‘ by Beatrice Groves for the actual allegorical representation of those Goblins). This was Saturday Night Live at it’s cheap-shot nadir, which is really saying something for a show with a fifty year history.

That was only five years ago. It is hard to imagine a more stunning example of life-imitating-fiction than this years-long episode of Legacy Media piling on the author of the Harry Potter novels in parallel with Rowling’s depiction of the mindless response of Daily Prophet readers to the lies they published courtesy of the Ministry of Magic.

Last Tuesday’s vote turned out to be at least in part a referendum on whether Rowling was a bigot and fascist or a heroic champion of biology based feminism and the rights of women and children. She seems to have weathered the agonies of the last five years better than Pete Davidson…

Rowling Calls Out US and UK Leftists for “Astounding, Self-righteous Arrogance”

J. K. Rowling on Twixter today repeated her assertion in April that “the left has fucked up monumentally on gender identity ideology,” and, though she disavowed the idea that this was the difference maker in Trump’s victory this week, she made it clear that the progressive party’s having done “its utmost to alienate people it used to represent” played its part. Here is that explosive long-form tweet and some of the more interesting responses and relevant commentary:

I wrote the words below in April, about the UK left, and I’m retweeting them today for the benefit of some of the numbskulls in my mentions.

Women like me, and there are a lot of us, aren’t and never have been far-right. We simply want the left to wake the hell up, because we’re watching it do its utmost to alienate people it used to represent.

I’m not saying Trump’s win was down to the gender stuff – I’m not an American voter, so can’t judge. In any case, the Labour Party won the last UK election and they’ve embraced gender identity ideology whole-heartedly (although they won against a Tory government so enfeebled and unpopular it would have been miraculous if they hadn’t, and their popularity since gaining office has plummeted.)

What I do know is that millions of women in the UK and across the developed world are extremely angry about men in women’s sport, men in women’s jails and the erosion of single-sex spaces. Parents are angry at being demonised because they don’t want their troubled kids to undergo irreversible medical treatments of extremely questionable benefit. People are sick to the back teeth of being bullied and threatened for refusing to embrace an elitist, academia-generated ideology that’s having severe real world consequences.

Large swathes of the left continue to be threatening and abusive to anybody who resists their attempts to impose ideological language or bully them out of wrongthink. Leftist activists jeer and sneer at erstwhile female allies for the crime of believing biological sex is real and matters. And leftist leaders still appear more interested in sucking up to gender activists than – to take a topical example in the UK – female nurses whose crime is not wanting to undress in front of a fully intact male.

So to those screaming ‘bigot’ and ‘fascist’ at me, you should know two things. Firstly, I’m completely indifferent to your disapproval, as I’d have thought you’d have realised by now. Secondly, and far more importantly, the only thing more harmful to your cause than your pseudo-religious belief in gender identities is your astounding, self-righteous arrogance.

Rowling had a back-and-forth with @KProtein19 about whether this issue tipped the scales in Trump’s favor. The consensus was that Trump had a relatively small budget for ad buys relative to the oligarchs’ candidate but decided to go all in on anti-“transgender” pieces to win the votes of those who would normally vote for the Blue candidate. [Read more…]

The Rowling Library Magazine #95: Solve et Coagula, Odd ‘Stones’ Editions, More!

It’s the end of the first week of a tumultuous month — and our friends at The Rowling Library have posted their latest issue! Founder and Chief Wizard at TRL, Patricio Tarantino, wrote this about the current issue:

Welcome to Issue #95 of The Rowling Library Magazine! As we do every November, we’re celebrating another anniversary. We’re  now entering our 9th year—way back in November 2016, we began a magazine about J.K. Rowling and Harry Potter, not knowing  how far we’d go. After all this time, here we are, still creating new content, analysis, news, and more. Here’s hoping we’ll keep  going for many more years to come!

In this particular issue, Oliver Horton returns with his Scene Autopsy, and he’s chosen a scene from Mike Newell’s Goblet of Fire. From Italy, A. Dalla Palma closes out his piece ‘Solve et Coagula‘ with the second part.

We also have a review of the new book Christmas at Hogwarts, and we take a look at five lesser-known editions of Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s Stone published by Scholastic.

Mona Morsy (a former contributor to our magazine) shares details about her new project: a physical magazine on the Harry  Potter Trading Card Game. And, as always, we have the Wizard of the Month!

Thank you for continuing to support and choose us.

You can download the pdf copy of Issue #95 here, read it online via your web browser via this link, and support all that TRL does by making a contribution on this secure page.