Sunrise on the Reaping: All We Know

Photo by Todd Plitt, Scholastic

With a week to go until the publication of the second Hunger Games series prequel, let’s take a look at the five things we have been told about Sunrise on the Reaping.

(1) The Plot — and the Ending?

From the Sunrise Amazon page:

When you’ve been set up to lose everything you love, what is there left to fight for?

As the day dawns on the fiftieth annual Hunger Games, fear grips the districts of Panem. This year, in honor of the Quarter Quell, twice as many tributes will be taken from their homes.

Back in District 12, Haymitch Abernathy is trying not to think too hard about his chances. All he cares about is making it through the day and being with the girl he loves.

When Haymitch’s name is called, he can feel all his dreams break. He’s torn from his family and his love, shuttled to the Capitol with the three other District 12 tributes: a young friend who’s nearly a sister to him, a compulsive oddsmaker, and the most stuck-up girl in town. As the Games begin, Haymitch understands he’s been set up to fail. But there’s something in him that wants to fight . . . and have that fight reverberate far beyond the deadly arena.

For readers of the Hunger Games original series, this is not much of tease. We’ve read about the Quarter Quell that Haymitch Abernathy won in Chasing Fire, chapter 14, in which Peeta and Katniss watch the edited tape of how he survived. All Ms Collins’ books are twenty-seven chapters long, which makes chapter 14 of Chasing Fire the central or pivotal chapter of that book and of the entire series. In the coming week we’ll be taking a deep dive into it, as you’d expect.

But we know how Haymitch’s Hunger Games experience ends or at least how the Capitol edited the story. That’s a first for anything Collins has written.

(2) We Have the First Two Pages of the Story

Scholastic released a teaser as a kind of ‘book trailer’ and it has quite a bit of information we didn’t have from Haymitch, who said relatively little about his Games in the Katniss and Peeta Saga. If you haven’t read it, you can read it at one of the several venues that claim to have it exclusively. Here’s the Barnes & Noble version.

I hope to give this excerpt a close reading in the next few days with Elizabeth Baird-Hardy but the top three notes of interest are that Haymitch is the narrator of the opening chapter (and I hope the rest of the book), it is his 16th birthday and as a gift to Abernathy fans we get to meet his younger brother and mother as well as a brief look at their subsistence existence, and, last but not least, it is a Reaping Day times Two because of the Quarter Quell and our hero wants to spend some time with his true love, Lenore Dove. [Read more…]

‘The Whole Life of J. K. Rowling’ (2022)

A Hogwarts Professor No-Prize to the first Rowling Reader who can identify Five Errors or Seven Critical Omissions in this “Whole Life in One Video” presentation!

Mailbag: What Are Serious Readers to Do With the Harry Potter Theme Parks? Sacred Art, Neo-Iconoclasm, and More

I received this email from Justin Clavet last month and he has given me permission to post it with my response. It touches on one of the keystones of our conversations here at HogwartsProfessor, namely, the relative value of various media experiences of the same story.

Justin agrees to some extent with my thesis that screened adaptations of story are not only not imaginative experiences of the work per se but destructive of the reading experience had before or after it. His question is about the theme park experience of a work, specifically the Universal Studios Harry Potter theme parks.

It’s a wonderful question and it comes from a serious reader whose favorite Rowling work is Casual Vacancy, the second member of that very exclusive club I have now met. We’ll start with his letter and then after the jump I’ll offer my first thoughts about his question in hope of beginning a conversation about how to understand the immersive experience of a theme park based on a written work.

Hi John,

I am probably one of the few who came to the books by way of the Universal theme park experiences. I ignored the books as a child – in spite of my friends’ recommendations – because everyone was reading them and I didn’t want to be part of the crowd. (Kids make some stupid choices.) But when I was living and going to college in Orlando in my 20s, I had an annual pass for the Walt Disney World and Universal Orlando theme parks (for a Florida resident at the time, this was cheaper entertainment than a monthly cable bill, if you can believe it).

I was enchanted by the Diagon Alley and Hogsmeade themed lands there, having only seen films 1-5, and never having read a single page of the books. I ordered myself a complete box set of the Bloomsbury editions and got started. I switched back and forth between reading the text and listening to Jim Dale’s excellent audiobook narrations. I fell in love and my life was changed.

(I managed, ca. 2018, to read about the death of Dumbledore in the Half-Blood Prince and the triumph of Harry over death and Voldemort in the Deathly Hallows unspoilt. I don’t know how many people of my generation could say that about their first reading of the books in their mid-20s. That was a real blessing.)

After finishing the Harry Potter series, I dove right in to The Casual Vacancy and the Strike-Ellacott stories. Somewhere in between, I found this great site of yours.

All that as background to say…This is one piece here to which I keep coming back. I agree with you entirely about film “adaptations” and their corrosive effects on the stories we read in books. It diminishes our imagination (making forceful intrusions, like seeing Maggie Smith’s face and hearing Maggie Smith’s voice when reading about Prof. McGonagall) and corrupts our memories (like thinking that Harry saw Peter Pettigrew on the Marauder’s Map). Also, so much of the symbolism and meaning is lost by the omissions and abbreviations necessitated by the medium’s runtime limitations. In short, it’s a cheapened experience that can injure our reading enjoyment. I’d love to read more about your thoughts on the “neo-iconoclasm of film.”

I’ve come to the decision that I will no longer watch motion picture “adaptations” of the stories I love. The Casual Vacancy is my favorite of Rowling’s works, and I think that TV series is a particularly bad adaptation, even being produced by her own company. I have seen some of the early episodes of the CB Strike TV series but have no intention of ever continuing because I have fantastically vivid images of Robin and Strike in my head and I don’t want to start seeing Holliday Grainger and Tom Burke there instead.

I still enjoy the medium of theme parks, though. Done well, they can be a most inviting and excellent collaboration of the arts of architecture, landscaping, gardening, interior design, cuisine, musical composition, and storytelling – altogether, placemaking, if you will. Unfortunately, they are also likely the most commercialized setting of these arts.

[Read more…]

Rowling Troubled Blood Source Material — Louise Penny’s Nature of the Beast?

As I explained in a January post, ‘Louise Penny: Chief Inspector Gamache,’ no less a novelist than Lou Berney told me in 2016 that I had to read Penny’s Bury Your Dead (he was my MFA adviser, so the ‘had to’ had real force). It delivered the punch he promised: Penny’s planning gave her sixth Gamache novel a series of twists at the finish that left me dizzy for several days. I wasn’t the only one that was head spinning and marveling at her accomplishment; the novel won an Agatha Award, an Anthony Award, a Macavity Award, an Arthur Ellis Award, and a Nero Award the year of its publication.

What was so great about it and why should a serious reader of Rowling-Galbraith care? In brief, Bury Your Dead revisits the murder of the previous novel in the series, The Brutal Telling, while simultaneously solving another murder and slow-revealing the near-death experience Gamache suffered between the two novels as he struggled to prevent a terrorist attack in Quebec. That’s its greatness; you should read it (get the one volume edition of Telling and Dead if you can) if only to feel the mystery genre boundaries stretched by a master story-teller.

What’s in it for the Strike-Ellacott reader? As I hinted in January, I think Hallmarked Man is going to have Bury Your Dead echoing, at least with respect to the revisiting what you thought you knew for sure at the end of Running Grave — and finding out you were wrong. Penny’s one-two punch would be an excellent warm-up for that imaginative judo experience.

I have read twelve of Penny’s Chief Inspector Gamache mysteries in the last forty days and enjoyed every one. I doubt I’ll re-read the series (should I manage to get through the remaining seven books in it – and, no, I won’t be reading the mystery she co-wrote with, egad, Hilary Clinton…) but I am a real fan of the ‘Three Pines’ cast of characters and an admirer of Penny’s craft.

What moved me to revisit the Canadian mysteries today was reflection on the eleventh novel in the series, The Nature of the Beast. It was nominated for an Anthony Award, an Agatha Award, and was the winner of Left Coast Crime‘s Best World Mystery when it came out, though it was perhaps the most preposterous of the Three Pines murder mysteries. Three Pines is a tiny town, lost to the world, on the Vermont-Quebec border with a population of about one hundred; making it the nexus of the international arms trade and a hide-away for serial killers and Vietnam era war criminals was quite the stretch even in Penny’s hands.

Two things about it rather startled me. [Read more…]

Rowling Gives Her ‘State of the Trans Conflict’ Address to Gender Holdouts

A representative of the Gender Ideology camp responded with snark, straight up:

Rowling replied by posting without comment a relatively current survey of British public opinion about “transgender rights,” almost all of which TRA talking points are marked as “Majority Disagree,” i.e., “the whole world” if anything seems to reject the claims of those who insist a thinking person (TM) must never “conflate” sex and gender.

Her implicit message to the TRAs and Gender Ideologues? The facts are now well known, the charade is now over, and “transgender women” are hereafter best described as “trans-identifying men.”

Three quick points after the jump: [Read more…]