Rowling Mourns Marianne Faithfull; Confirms Rokeby-Jagger Parallel Life in Leda Strike’s Real Life Analogue?

Marinanne Faithfull, English pop icon with a history eerily reminiscent of Leda Strike’s, died yesterday, age 78. J. K. Rowling promptly tweeted the message above and retweeted a similar note from the Rolling Stones. Three quick notes:

(1) Broken English Rowling Readers learned in Troubled Blood about the author’s admiration for Joni Mitchell and especially her Court and Spark album. Mitchell, a later in life discovery for Mrs Murray, joined the short list of popular music groups that we knew were Rowling favorites from her youth (e.g., The Smiths, Siouxsie and the Banshees). Until today, I don’t think she’s mentioned Marianne Faithfull or this “all time” “favorite album,” Broken English. If, like me, this album was new to you, here is the title track and the controversial ‘Why D’ya Do It?’ from that disc:

Rowling was not alone in loving Broken English, Faithfull’s comeback album and consensus “masterpiece.” From the Wikipedia article about it:

Broken English received critical acclaim. It peaked at number 82 on the Billboard 200, becoming her first album to chart in the United States since Go Away from My World (1965) and giving Faithfull a first nomination for the Grammy Award for Best Female Rock Vocal Performance. It reached number 57 in the United Kingdom and entered the top five in Germany, France and New Zealand. Broken English was certified platinum in Germany and France, and sold over one million copies worldwide. Two singles were released from the album, with “The Ballad of Lucy Jordan” peaking at number 48 on the UK Singles Chart. The album was included on NME magazine’s list of “500 Greatest Albums of All Time” and in the book 1001 Albums You Must Hear Before You Die…. In 1981, Faithfull was nominated for the Grammy Award for Best Female Rock Vocal Performance for this album.

Released in late 1979, if we take Rowling’s broken heart emoji on today’s tweet seriously, she was listening to Broken English at the critical time of her adolescence in Tutshill through at least her days at the University of Exeter. This ‘find’ is not going to displace Austen, Shakespeare, or even Wodehouse on the list of Rowling’s greatest literary influences, but I wonder if it might rank with her recently discovered favorite, John Keats? Serious Readers of Rowling, especially those who track her signature intertextuality, are obliged, I think, to give this album, perhaps all of Faithfull’s work, a close listen.

(2) The Life of Marianne Faithfull

Broken English, as mentioned, was a “comeback” effort for the artist, whose life had fallen to the depths. Again, via Wikipedia:

Broken English was Faithfull’s first major release since her album Love in a Mist (1967). After ending her relationship with Mick Jagger in 1970 and losing custody of her son, Faithfull suffered from heroin addiction and lived on the streets of London. Severe laryngitis and drug abuse during this period permanently altered Faithfull’s voice, leaving it cracked and lower in pitch. She attempted a comeback in 1976 with Dreamin’ My Dreams, which achieved only minor success. Shortly afterwards, Faithfull began working with musician Barry Reynolds, who produced the songs “Broken English” and “Why D’Ya Do It?”. The demos attracted the attention of Chris Blackwell who signed Faithfull to his record label Island Records.

How low had she fallen?

Faithfull ended her relationship with Jagger in May 1970 after she started an affair with Anglo-Irish nobleman “Paddy” Rossmore. She also lost custody of her son in that same year, which led to her attempting suicide. Faithfull’s personal life went into decline, and her career went into a tailspin. She made only a few appearances, including an October 1973 performance with David Bowie, singing Sonny & Cher’s “I Got You Babe”.

Faithfull lived on London’s Soho streets for two years, suffering from heroin addiction and anorexia nervosa. Friends intervened and enrolled her in an NHSheroin-assisted treatment programme. She failed at controlling or stabilising her addiction at this time. In 1971, producer Mike Leander found her on the streets and made an attempt to revive her career, producing part of her album Rich Kid Blues. The album was shelved until 1985….Faithfull squatted in a Chelsea flat without hot water or electricity with then-boyfriend Ben Brierly of the band the Vibrators.

Faithfull had three miscarriages and four abortions. The first abortion was in 1965, when she had become pregnant by Gene Pitney; the procedure was still illegal in the United Kingdom at the time and Faithfull stated that she had a hard time dealing with the guilt. She began to feel better once her son was born the year after. Subsequent terminations were from her period of drug abuse as she did not wish for the children to be born as addicts

She not only survived these depths, she became something of a legend, both as lyricist, performer, and writer (her several straight-from-the-hip memoirs were all best sellers). Faithfull’s remarkable and forceful personality, evident in this 2018 Guardian profile, ‘Marianne Faithfull: “This is the most honest record I’ve made. It’s open-heart surgery, darling”,’ reminded me repeatedly of Rowling; I thought more than once, “This might be what Rowling sounds like at age 80.”

“It’s literally a pain to fucking do anything,” she says, settling in her seat with Miriam’s help. She’s brought a fan, plus a plate of mango, cut into tiny pieces, which she lifts to her mouth to reach the final bits (“excuse me for being disgusting”). She then smokes a cigarette slowly: she started again a few years ago. “It’s the last thing I do. I don’t even drink coffee any more!” She sighs, theatrically. “Everything fucking hurts. But you try and fucking stop me.”…

What does she think of similar revelations after the #MeToo campaign? Her response is odd: “I couldn’t give a flying fuck.” Really? “No.” But when other women are honest, like you were, are you glad? “Yeah, I’m very glad. Proud. About fucking time! Women spend their lives just trying to please men.” Isn’t that you endorsing what they’re doing? She shrugs, still smiling. “Whatever!”

Instead, Faithfull tells me about her Austrian mother, Eva von Sacher-Masoch, and Jewish grandmother, Flora, who brought her up in an ordinary terraced house in Reading after her parents divorced. Her mother had been an actress and dancer before the second world war; she had lived with her mother in Vienna during it, being protected from the Nazis thanks to their aristocratic background. “But when the Russians entered Vienna, my mother and grandmother were raped, and after that my mother got pregnant and had an abortion. Then the next thing that happened – which always happens – is that she really wanted another baby. Then she met my father, and I think she thought that he would be a great father for a baby, and so she married him and they had me.”

They split up six years later. “It was probably all for the best,” Faithfull says, “and I would be a different person [if they’d stayed together]. I probably wouldn’t have hated men so much! But, you know, Mum needed me.” Faithfull adds that she did many similar things to her mum. She had an abortion early in 1965, after getting pregnant by Gene Pitney on a UK tour, then, in May, married her boyfriend of several years, Indica gallery owner John Dunbar, and had their son, Nicholas, in November. “It took me a long time to get away from that feeling I got from Mum, about men. Decades. But I don’t have it any more.”

She also got pregnant by Mick Jagger, for whom she left Dunbar in 1966, but lost the baby seven months into the pregnancy. Did that leave a lasting effect? “Yes, of course,” she says. “But please, it’s taken me years to separate myself from the Rolling Stones. I never talk about Mick any more, and I won’t talk about then.” There were two more marriages: to the Vibrators’ Ben Brierley in 1979, which lasted six years; and to writer Giorgio Della Terza in 1988, which lasted three. Then there was a 15-year relationship with French record producer Francois Ravard, who still manages her; they split in 2009, but remain good friends.

“My main priority in my head was always my work,” she continues, “but then, of course, the men came… and it wasn’t really what I wanted, but I was too pretty to be left alone.” She attempted suicide by drug overdose on a plane in 1969; she divorced and lost custody of her son a year later. By 1972, she was an anorexic heroin addict, living rough in London. “My answer to everything was to get as stoned as possible and live on the street, which made me sort of unattractive.” Making yourself unappealing liberated you? “Yeah!” Her smile broadens, as if this was the most wonderful revelation in the world.

Do read the whole thing. Faithfull was a remarkable artist and what used to be called a “vivid personality.”

If you heard of her in the United States, it was probably her 1964 recording of the Jagger-Richards song, ‘As Tears Go By:’

From The Guardian profile‘s notes on ‘As Tears Go By:’

Faithfull’s music is rarely discussed in any detail. Yes, she was originally signed because Rolling Stones manager Andrew Loog Oldham chanced upon her at a party, saying later he saw “an angel with big tits” with “a face that could sell”. No, she doesn’t have a voice to match that soft-focus face, and she never really did. Even the first song she sang, Mick Jagger and Keith Richards’s As Tears Go By, is stripped of any sentiment by her deadpan delivery. She was 17, sounding like Nico before Nico. (She sings it again on Negative Capability, forcefully, reclaiming it.)

(3) The Leda Strike Parallels

I’ve written before about the many striking parallels between Jonny Rokeby, Cormoran Strike’s supposed biological father, and Mick Jagger of the Rolling Stones. See ‘Rokeby, Jagger, and Heroin’ for the full review. After comparing the ‘Personal Life’ Wikipedia pages of Jagger and the one written about Rokeby in Cuckoo’s Calling, the list of life-correspondences is, well, striking. The fictional character and real-life analogue are both:

Today we learned that Rowling has been a big fan of Marianne Faithfull, whose life not only parallels the author’s own in interesting ways (the “comeback” from near destitution as a single mother?), but seems a template for Leda Strike. Her dependence on and forever being linked to Rokeby as Faithfull was to Jagger and the descent into ‘living rough’ or in squalid squats after their break-up, not to mention the heroin connection and the smoking, all call the Broken English vocalist and composer to mind. From the Wikipedia life of Faithfull:

She began a much-publicised relationship with Mick Jagger [in 1966] and left her husband to live with him. The couple became a notorious part of the hip Swinging London scene. She is heard on The Beatles’ song “Yellow Submarine”.She was found wearing only a fur rug by police executing a drug search at Redlands, Keith Richards’s house in West Wittering, Sussex. In an interview 27 years later with A.M. Homes for Details, Faithfull discussed her wilder days and admitted that the drug bust fur rug incident had ravaged her personal life: “It destroyed me. To be a male drug addict and to act like that is always enhancing and glamorising. A woman in that situation becomes a slut and a bad mother.” It was during this time that Faithfull lost three opportunities to appear in films. “I really thought I had blown my career.” In 1968, Faithfull, by now addicted to cocaine, gave birth to a stillborn daughter (whom she had named Corrina) while returning from Jagger’s country house in Ireland.

Faithfull’s involvement in Jagger’s life was reflected in some of the Rolling Stones’s best known songs. “Sympathy for the Devil”, featured on the 1968 album Beggars Banquet, partially was inspired by The Master and Margarita, written by Mikhail Bulgakov, a book that Faithfull introduced to Jagger. The song “You Can’t Always Get What You Want” on the 1969 album Let It Bleed was supposedly written and composed about Faithfull; the songs “Wild Horses” and “I Got the Blues” on the 1971 album Sticky Fingers were allegedly influenced by Faithfull, and she co-wrote “Sister Morphine” (the writing credit for the song was the subject of a protracted legal battle that was resolved with Faithfull listed as co-author). In her autobiography, Faithfull said Jagger and Richards released it in their own names so that her agent did not collect all the royalties and proceeds from the song, especially as she was homeless and addicted to heroin at the time. In 1968, Faithfull appeared in The Rolling Stones Rock and Roll Circus concert, giving a solo performance of “Something Better”.

In the Guardian profile:

Of the police drugs raid of Keith Richards’s home, Redlands, in 1967, at which Faithfull emerged naked in a fur rug, she wrote: “They emerged with their reputations amplified as dangerous, glamorous outlaws… I was destroyed by the very things that enhanced them”; and of her first song, Sister Morphine: “I wasn’t going to be allowed to break out of my image… I would not be permitted to leave that tawdry doll behind.”…

Before I leave, she gets up slowly, another cigarette in her hand, and gives me a little tour of the flat, pointing out a beautiful nude and some landscapes by Anita Pallenberg (“people forget what brilliant talent she had”). A snap of Faithfull and Mick Jagger in the studio hangs in the loo (“best place for it!”). Half of her double bed is covered with books as is the rest of the house: she points out one she’s reading about John Lennon, and one about Shelley – her next project, also with Warren Ellis, is based on Prometheus Unbound. “I can’t say anything else!” she smiles, wickedly.

I have been speculating that the revelations of Hallmarked Man’s meeting between Rokeby and Strike will include the rock star’s confession that he loved Leda profoundly, that she broke his heart with “all her fucking men,” and that she contributed to The Deadbeats’ song catalogue — as I learned today Marianne Faithfull did the Rolling Stones.

I’ve pretty much given up my days of predicting plot points in the next Rowling-Galbraith effort, but, wow, have I felt a wave of that old feeling this morning. Especially as Rowling re-posted the ‘For Marianne’ tweet from the Rolling Stones; tell me she wasn’t actually throwing a little shade their way for Jagger’s treatment of Marianne Faithfull.

Requiescat in Pace, Marianne Faithfull!

 

Louise Penny: Chief Inspector Gamache

During the ‘Learn to Read Like a Writer’ first semesters of my MFA studies at Oklahoma City University, my tutor, novelist Lou Berney, recommended I read Louise Penny‘s Bury Your Dead for an experience of properly intensive planning. I had never heard of Penny or her procedural mystery hero, Chief Inspector Gamache, and not even Berney’s clues that I was in for a shock prepared me for the incredulity I felt at the end of that book.

No, I won’t spoil the surprise for you — beyond saying Bury Your Dead is the seventh of Penny’s Gamache or ‘Three Pines’ murder mysteries and you’ll get much more out of #7 if you’ve read #6.

My son Zossima lives in Oklahoma City and stops by several times a week to do his laundry, cook with his mother, and borrow some books from my library (I know he actually gets most of his books from the OKC Metropolitan Library downtown but I’m glad he comes in to ask me if I have a copy of Kate Atkinson’s latest or whatever). He told me several weeks ago that he needed to read Agatha Christie; “What one book do you recommend?” I gave him The Murder of Roger Ackroyd.

He’s a novelist and a very serious reader who has been ‘reading like a writer reads’ almost as long as he has been reading. Still, I felt a little bit like Lou Berney may have felt in assigning Bury Your Dead as a book I had to review; I knew Zossima’s head was going to explode at the twist in the last pages of Roger Akroyd. I was also elated because at last I knew what to get him for the Feast of Theophany, our family’s gift-giving holiday. I ordered a copy of Pierre Bayard’s Who killed Roger Ackroyd? : the mystery behind the Agatha Christie mystery to give him when he returned the Christie title to my shelf.

Why?

Because as head-spinning as the end of Christie’s Ackroyd is, Bayard, a French psychoanalyst and literary critic, argues persuasively that the murderer who Poirot reveals at the end of that novel didn’t do it — and that Christie must have been disappointed that none of her readers understood what Poirot was up to in pinning the crime on the wrong person. [Bayard did this with Conan Doyle, too, in Sherlock Holmes Was Wrong: Reopening the Case of The Hound of the Baskervilles.]

I’ll leave it to you to figure out why that gift giving made me think of Louise Penny’s Bury Your Dead. I spent my monthly book allowance on a Theophany present for myself: a lot of the first twelve Chief Inspector Gamache procedurals I found on eBay and a special one volume edition of The Brutal Telling and Bury Your Dead. I’m guessing that Zossima will be interested in reading that once he finishes the Bayard.

I bring that up because (1) if, like me, you are not aware of Louise Penny, whose most recent Gamache, #19, is currently atop the fiction best seller list in Canada, you’re in for a treat, (2) I’ll be writing, I hope, about the twist I think we’re being set up for a la Bury Your Dead in Hallmarked Man, and (3) my initial foray into Penny’s books leads me to think they are largely about loss as the key element in human existence. “Loss” is a near constant in Rowling’s descriptions of what her latest book is about.

I finished Still Life yesterday and am well into A Fatal Grace today. More anon!

Marathon Movie Madness for Muggles: February Features First Four Films

It’s a commonplace when old fans meet more recent Potter-philes that the one group says, “You can’t imagine what it was like not knowing how it ended, waiting on each new book…” The newbies are usually very polite about the smugness; I hope the old hands are as courteous when the readers “who didn’t have to wait” come up with insights that no one has noticed until now.

Believe me, it happens. I have a new friend to whom I am impatiently waiting to introduce you whose understanding of the theological underpinning of Harry Potter startled me, a feeling of “How did I miss that?” I haven’t had since reading chapter four of Beatrice Groves’ Literary Allusion in Harry Potter.

I thought of the differences between the four generations of Potter Pundits this morning when I learned that Warner Brothers will be re-releasing the first four adaptations of the Hogwarts Saga novels in February for experiencing on the Big Screen. From Collider:

Get ready to dust off your wands and step back into the Wizarding World, because the first four Harry Potter films are set to return to theaters nationwide in 2025, offering fans a chance to experience the magic on the big screen once again. But this time, there’s a special dusting of magic, as select screenings will be available in immersive formats like 3D and 4DX, bringing the beloved fantasy franchise to new formats but to the same audiences who have loved them for years.

Fathom Events is taking charge of a re-release, along with Warner Bros., to bring Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s StoneHarry Potter and the Chamber of SecretsHarry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban, and Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire back to multiplexes, starting on February 13, 2025. After that, the movies will be shown sequentially over three consecutive weekends, running from Thursdays through Sundays, and it will also mark the 20th anniversary of Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire, which originally premiered in 2005.

So, this is how it will work. At the end of February, every Thursday from the 13th forward will be a showing of Sorcerer’s Stone, every Friday Chamber of Secrets, every Saturday Prisoner of Azkaban, and every Sunday Goblet of Fire, the last Saturday and Sunday being in March. There will be three run-throughs of the first four films, which, if you’re loaded with Galleons, you can catch three times each or any variety of different ways (the one thing you cannot do is watch Goblet on the first Sunday and then catch the films in reverse order back to Stone, which would be a Time Turner trick of sorts).

For fans that are giving this a big yawn, the studio is introducing new big screen formats that weren’t available 2000 to 2005 when these films were first released.

I’m not a big fan of the adaptations. I suspect, though, that I may go with some friends to watch these new releases, if only to talk about where we were when we first saw each. Yes, it’s fan servicing and a money-grab that has next to nothing to do with Goblet’s twentieth anniversary (do people really observe those kinds of dates for movies?). It could nonetheless be an occasion for some great story-telling across fandom generations. I’d love to read if you might be going to one of these new releases in the comment boxes.

R. I. P. Jules Feiffer, Illustrious Satirist

Jules Feiffer died on 17 January this year at age 95 and I have to confess I was surprised to learn he lived to see 2025. The name in the obituary and the books associated with it in my deepest of my memories drew me back more than fifty years, a startling experience akin to a stray scent causing an avalanche of associations with a lost friend or a forgotten event.

Reading the obituaries online, I learned how other people remembered him. As a cartoonist for Playboy magazine, as a satirist of the English Punch tradition whose ‘strips’ in The Village Voice, even The New York Times, were biting and pointed simultaneously, as the screenwriter for films such as Carnal Knowledge: he had a full life of notable achievements, in other words, besides working on two books that shaped my life so intimately.

The first was the illustrations he did for Norton Juster’s The Phantom Tollbooth in 1961, the year I was born. It is the first book I can remember reading, though it’s safe to say I had read all the Dr Seuss classics, the Beginner Books series, and maybe even a few Hardy Boys serials before I met Milo, Tock, and the Humbug. I can’t even guess how many times I read it as a boy or as a dad excited to share it with my children. More recently I bought my daughter Sarah the annotated edition of Tollbooth to read to her three children and she was as thrilled and excited about that present as I can remember her being when we finally spent money we didn’t have to get her a flute equal to her zeal for the instrument.

The Phantom Tollbooth, in brief, was my doorway to thinking about words, stories, and books, and it was for my children as well, perhaps the entrance for several generations of readers — and Feiffer’s sketchy illustrations, the barest of line drawings really, are indelibly linked to that never-ending adventure in imagination. I only learned this morning that Feiffer was Juster’s roommate at the time he wrote the book and played a larger part in its writing than an illustrator might otherwise have. It makes sense that all the word play in Tollbooth might have sprung from puns shared by two friends in a months long conversation, one that bent my brain to thinking about words-about-words in a story about the story experience.

The second was Feiffer’s collation and annotation of The Great Comic Book Heroes, a book that came out in 1965 and I received as a Christmas gift sometime in the early 1970s. Its subtitle is one of the best ever: “the Origins and Early Adventures of the Classic Super-Heroes of the Comic Books, in Glorious Color.” I loved comic books as a child and young man, especially the super-hero variety if I also read the Charlton and Archie books as well. DC’s Batman was a favorite and I was blessed to grow up during the silver age of the several titles for that character, the 70s era of writer Dennis O’Neil and artist Neal Adams, that almost made up for the camp television series of that time.

Feiffer’s over-sized book, a collection and reprinting of the earliest comic books of my favorite heroes with his helpful commentary and introductions, made me think for the first time about comics as a genre of story, one that had historical beginnings and a rainbow variety of possible meanings in the hands of different writers and artists, no where more obvious than in the Batman series. The Great Comic Book Heroes is also where I learned that my given name, ‘Alan Scott,’ was from the golden age or original Green Lantern, a revelation that astonished me because of my father’s disinterest in any kind of fiction or reading, really, beyond news magazines (it turns out, he picked the name up from a comic book he looked at while waiting for a haircut).

Feiffer’s Comic Book Heroes in “Glorious Color” was a beautiful book that my mother was happy to include on the living room glass-topped coffee-table with other over-sized photo collections that were popular at the time. It was always at hand, consequently, which led to repeated revisits and re-readings. I have to think now that it was an invisible influence on my thinking about stories, writers, and that this was a field to be interpreted and understood better, at a depth different than the delightful unconscious imaginative experience.

I doubt I would have liked Jules Feiffer, just as I’m pretty sure I would have been very uncomfortable talking with Ted Geisel (‘Dr Seuss’). I am saddened by his death, nonetheless, because I never expressed to the man, one I assumed had died ages ago, my gratitude for Tollbooth and The Great Comic Book Heroes. He changed my life, or, better, he helped shape it at its beginnings, and all the friendships I have had inside books and with other readers talking about those stories since to some degree I owe to him. Memory eternal!

 

Rowling Bankrolls Gender Critical Resistance in UK and Australia

Today Rowling retweeted an X posting by Julie Bindell that included her recent podcast comments about Pink News, an interview she chose to caption with the brief and terse, “I sued Pink News.”

It was not news per se but Rowling’s retweeting it included her back and forth replies to Bindell that of course went out to Rowling’s 14 million plus followers on that platform. It had a startling finish:

The “shocked” bit is evidently sarcasm, meaning “this was very well known and you know very well how involved I was in that suit.” Bindel’s “I don’t like to mention it” is similarly sarcastic; she is not one to suffer injuries or fools quietly (her courage in reporting the Muslim rape gangs for many years speaks to her temperament in this regard). Rowling segues from that false humility or reserve to the subject of her having been rumored to be bankrolling this lawsuit against Pink News, which Bliden confirms.

And then Rowling drops what seems to be the point of the re-tweeting and the entire exchange. “I feel today’s a really good day to let the delightful Cohen and James know I was indeed backing you.” Rowling as a rule does not flaunt her private generosity in public. What has happened to make 18 January a “really good today” to reveal that she had been paying Blindel’s significant legal costs in her battle against Pink News, costs that would otherwise have bankrupted the independent journalist?

Two explanations are credible, I think.

The first is that this is Pink News specific. The two owners of this LGBTQ+ publication are facing a landslide of allegations from former employees of sexual misconduct and, at best, a “hostile work environment.” If you listen to the Blindel podcast comments about Pink News, the edited version makes sure to highlight Blindel’s comments that Pink News published almost 700 articles about J. K. Rowling to defame her as a “transphobe,” “bigot,” and “TERF.” Today would be the day to reveal to “Cohen and James” that their attempt to wait out Blindel and bankrupt her in a kind of “lawfare” had failed because the journalist had the barracuda barristers of a billionaire at her side; their fall from grace, Rowling seemed to think, was the right moment to reveal a la the Count of Monte Christo who their real persecutor is.

Hence the popularity of this meme today:

The message seems to be Rowling telling those who come for her that actions have consequences, i.e.,  F. A. F. O.

That makes sense except that the Pink News story is more than a week old by BBC time and Rowling said “today’s a really good day” to reveal she had Blindel’s back in this court case. This is beside the points that Rowling is not given to either flashing her generosity for social media credit or doing end zone dances. Why “today,” then?

Check out this story today in the UK Daily Mail about a Gender Identity case in the Australian courts: [Read more…]