J. K. Rowling and the Skegness Scandal

The latest brouhaha involving Rowling and the Transphobia Thought Police online oddly enough features an institution that features in one of her novels, perhaps the best single piece she has written to date, namely, Troubled Blood. Let’s quickly review the scandal at Skegness and how all the usual players in the ‘Transgender Thespian Troupe’ have said their formulaic lines before noting Rowling’s connection to the venue in question (and the likelihood she has been there in person).

In brief, Rowling tweeted out her disappointment that Butlins in Skegness had responded with deferential apologies to critics of how their security staff had removed biological men from a women’s restroom at that resort. Per The Independent:

Jae Roberts, one of the transgender women who claims to have been forcibly removed by security, shared a post on Instagram explaining her version of events.

“Butlins security just dragged five trans people out of the women’s toilets. Got slammed against a wall and dragged downstairs for intervening,” she said.

Roberts alleged she and the other trans women were asked to leave the toilet by security, which sparked chants of “let them pee”. She then claimed guards had returned with “reinforcements”, who began to forcibly remove the trans women from the bathroom.

A spokesperson for Butlin’s said: “We were very concerned to hear about this incident. Much to our disappointment, our third-party security contractor did not follow our processes despite being thoroughly briefed.

“Once we were made aware they were immediately removed from duty for not handling the situation in line with our processes. We are in direct contact with those involved and are reviewing how we work with contractors.”

The company added the security guard’s suspension had nothing to do with the trans women’s gender identity but the manner in which they were allegedly removed from the toilet.

Rowling responded to this bending-of-the-knee to those who believe that biological men “identifying” as women have the right to female-only spaces by tweeting them to clarify their policies so holiday goers would know where they want to spend their money, i.e., ‘Tell the world whether you’re on board with men in women’s spaces or not so those who agree with you can choose Butlins for their holidays and those who disagree will not.’ Her words were:

Does Butlins think the desire of cross-dressing men to enter women-only spaces is more important than women’s and girls’ right to privacy and dignity? Hopefully Butlins will explain their policy, so women and families can make an informed choice about where to go on holiday.

This is, in essence, the threat of a boycott by the great majority of people who do not want women and girls to have to share restrooms with biological men. Butlins is in a jam because they tried to thread the needle of not offending the “transgender” population or the media elite who champion this group’s “rights” while maintaining its policy that men are not allowed in their women’s restrooms.

The “usual suspects,” of course, promptly castigated Rowling for “frothing up rage” against a persecuted minority and for once again demonstrating to all the world that she is “transphobic.” (The successful weaponization of supposed phobias by same sex attraction champions and Muslims is of course being mimicked by “transgenderism” advocacy groups, with similar if relatively muted results.) Those who believe Rowling is a bigot and bully were confirmed in their opinion and her fans on the Gender Critical side of this controversy once again rallied to her flag.

If this Skegness Scandal has any future repercussions, then, it will be in how public venues choose to respond. Will they tell their security contractors to let the “transgender women” who are biological men to use women’s restrooms lest they suffer the bad publicity consequent to enforcing that space as a women’s only place? Or will they take the much harder course of guaranteeing the safety of their women’s restrooms in order to avoid being castigated by J. K. Rowling on her twixter feed to more than 14 million followers, a drubbing that will be carried as a feature story by media outlets locally and globally?

For struggling venues such as Butlins, reduced to three parks from a high of ten, this is a tough choice; it’s a lose-lose, frankly, for them which is a real victory for sanity in public spaces. Rowling has succeeded in insuring that their choosing to do the easy thing and fold to “transgender” bullying will experience an economic consequence at least equal to the loss of -TQ business. If there is “news” in this otherwise meaningless tabloid fodder, it is that Rowling is taking a new tack in her offensive to restore women’s rights in the UK, a decidedly economic push to prod businesses to stand up to bullies and do the right thing.

For those of us who are Rowling Readers, this is news to file away for future reference because, of all the ‘Golden Threads’ that run through her work start to finish, the most obvious and undeniable is ‘Violence Against Women.’ Rowling’s extracurricular crusade to champion the rights of women and children contra the rip tide of “transgender” over-reach is in lock step with a constant plot-point and theme in everything she has written.

This specific story, though, has the extra attraction for Rowling Readers of involving a location, Skegness’ beach resort, which Cormoran Strike and Robin Ellacott visit during Troubled Blood, and a business, Butlins, at which a murder occurs in the same novel.

One of the suspects in the disappearance and suspected murder of Margot Bamborough, M.D., was Steve Douthwaite. The Strike Agency expends significant effort in locating Douthwaite forty years after that crime and finally find and confront him in Skegness, where he works for his wife’s Bed-and-Breakfast inn for holiday goers. One of the landmark conversations that Robin and Strike have in the course of their relationship takes place looking out over the sea in Skegness after their interview with Douthwaite, now ‘Diamond,’ in which Strike sings ‘Trelawney’ to his partner and reveals his fealty to Cornwall.

And Butlins? After the police realized that Douthwaite was not a credible suspect in the 1974 Bamborough disappearance, he changed his name to ‘Jacks’ and took a job at the Butlins in Clacton-On-Sea, an east of London resort that has since closed. While there, though, Carl Oakden tracked him down for his book about Margot Bamborough from which source Janice Beattie learned his new name, ‘Stevie Jacks,’ and where he was hiding. She visited him and promptly murdered the young woman he fancied in order to send him a message. He got the message, changed his name again, this time to ‘Steve Diamond,’ and got a new Red Coat job at the original and much larger Butlins holiday camp in Ingoldmells near Skegness in Lincolnshire, England. He met his wife Donna there and settled down to a life-in-hiding only punctuated by his serial sexual trysts with women. Peaceful, at least, until Strike tracked him down.

So, has Rowling visited the Butlins in Ingoldmells, Skegness, though it never appears in  Troubled Blood? My bet is that she has. She captures the flavor of the holiday camp and the life of a Red Coat in telling detail in Troubled Blood, so I think she has visited one. Of the three Butlins still in operation, the Clacton-on-Sea venue having closed and been demolished in 1983, the Bognor Regis location is probably closer to London than Ingoldmells, but Rowling clearly visited Skegness to capture its distinct qualities for the time Strike and Ellacott spend there in Troubled Blood. If I were a betting man, I’d wager that Rowling made a trip to the Ingoldmells Butlins and spoke to a few Red Coats.

Which would mean that her tweets this past week expressing her disappointment with Butlins in Skegness would have been colored by her knowledge of the place. In a case of art-anticipating-life, she had brought to life a cowardly male character of easy virtue as a Skegness Butlins Red Coat, a man who ran from doing the right thing in the Bamborough case because of his fear of crossing the murderous Janice Beattie. How curious that, in the here and now ‘real world,’ Rowling is calling to account the Skegness Butlins for their failing in courage and principle.

 

Rowling’s Swan Header and Trans Tweet

 

I am struggling with the Casual Vacancy Pregnancy Trap post, largely because my copy of this book is a ‘Large Print’ edition that I find it difficult to navigate. Or is it because the Byzantine (labyrinthine?) structure of this book, the least popular of Rowling’s work despite Potter level sales, makes searching it a needle-haystack effort? Regardless, still a work in progress because I have to find the passages about Pregnancy Traps to make the case — and there are three Pregnancy Traps in Casual Vacancy if read diagonally and in ‘Small Print.’

So here is a quick post about Rowling’s twixter page changes and long-form tweets:

We’ve moved from the Oranda goldfish to a swan in Rowling’s header. A quick word search reveals ‘swan’ appears in every book except Running Grave and they have been the subject of intense Serious Striker speculation. Here are five quick links; use the search tool in the sidebar to find many more.

The good news is that Rowling is hinting that we’ll back to the swans in Hallmarked Man, but, no, I won’t be speculating about the indefinite number of possibilities in hopes of a bullseye. I have Pregnancy Traps to discover and explain…

On to the latest Trans Wars tweet! Here Rowling takes a time-out in the exchange of snark and grenades between sides (and, really, Trans Terrorists, when are you going to realize that Rowling owns this venue the way Nadal played on clay courts? Give it up, already) to define her terms. She explains that the “umbrella term” has become whatever one wants and the sense in which she uses it. [Read more…]

Rowling Library Tweets HBO TV Rumor

Three thoughts on this rumor:

(1) It’s a Rumor. The Rowling Library (TRL) is very well connected with Rowling, Inc., and all the fandom outlets that cover it so it can be taken seriously but TRL also carefully notes it is best to wait for confirmation.

(2) It’s Not Credible. If Fortress Rowling chooses a writer unfamiliar with the books and one who has already expressed a willingness and desire to re-invent the series as part of his “adaptation” of it for television, that would mean, because The Presence owns Bronte Studios and is signed on as an Executive Producer, that she will have signed off on another writer having his way with her legacy. And that simply beggars belief; Rowling has been and remains protective of her work as it is adapted whence both her break with Warner Brothers and their blockbuster Double David movies and her invention of her own studio.

(3) It’s Too Credible. Can you say ‘Black Hermione’? ‘Gay Dumbledore, Scorpius, and Albus Severus’? How about ‘Solve et Coagula’ and Rowling’s re-invention of her public persona after the RFK ‘Ripple of Hope’ Award dinner? I find it not only believable but somehow even likely that Rowling will do what she can to make the teevee adaptation of her Hogwarts Saga ‘edgy,’ which is to say ‘offensive and upsetting to the greater audience of people who love the books and watch the film versions on endless loop.’ A further explosion of the Potter fanbase by allowing the teevee Hogwarts to be defamiliarizing or estranging rather than a re-telling may very well be in the cards.

Interesting Times!

Rowling Twixter Fish and Strike Update

Rowling’s latest Twixter page header is a Blue Oranda Goldfish. Two quick facts and one speculative leap about this beauty:

It grows to eight or nine inches in length, which means you need a big tank if you want it to feel at home. By ‘big,’ I mean at least 20 to 30 gallons up to a 300 gallon ‘bowl’ or a carp pond in the backyard. They can live as long as fifteen years, even twenty, so investing in the right living conditions and care has a pay off in longevity. The chief challenges in that effort are feeding them just the right amount, not too much, not too little, and keeping the tank clean. As big as the fish gets, it produces a lot of waste so the filtration system has to be carefully monitored and the water changed regularly, which, given the size of the tank, is a big deal.

They only exist in captivity and have been a status symbol for the wealthy for centuries:

Orandas, like all fancy varieties of goldfish, are not found in nature. 

According to recent genetic research, it’s thought that all modern goldfish are descended from a species of wild carp, Carassius auratus gibelio. These Prussian or Silver Prussian carp originate from Central Asia, specifically, Siberia, where the fish live in slow-moving or stagnant water bodies, such as ponds, ditches, lakes, and rivers, feeding on algae, plant matter, insect larvae, small crustaceans, and the like.

For hundreds of years, carp were raised as a food source. However, in the 1500s, the first ornamental goldfish were traded to Japan by Chinese breeders, arriving in parts of Europe in the 1600s and the US by the 1800s. 

Large, flat-bodied, brightly colored goldfish were originally kept as ornamental pond fish. However, fancy rounder-bodied varieties were later developed by Asian enthusiasts to be displayed in glass vessels as status symbols in the homes of the wealthy. 

The name ‘Oranda’ is, frankly, fascinating to anyone who took an introductory Latin course in high school. The word also has a meaning in Turkish and Asian languages that may be as relevant, but I’m useless on those scores.

Focusing on the Latin, oranda is a gerundive from oro, orare, the first conjugation Latin verb for ‘to pray, to beg,’ technically the future passive participle, almost certainly here used as a substantive adjective or noun.  Most of us know the ‘-nda’ form from two popular names for women, ‘Amanda’ and ‘Miranda.’ One of the uses or forces of a gerundive is a notion of obligation, hence the names: ‘Amanda’ is ‘a woman who must be or ought to be loved,’ and ‘Miranda’ a ‘woman about whom all must marvel or wonder.’ ‘Oranda,’ on this model, would mean ‘a woman who must be worshipped or begged.’

Oranda, though, is more famous in a slightly different form, as a gerund or verbal noun. The phrase Lex orandi which is so central to Christian teaching, means simply ‘the rule of prayer,’ better ‘the ruling principle of worship.’ [Lex is often translated as ‘law’ which naturally has a sense of force and obligation in it, but here that sense is more of a ‘natural law’ in the sense of the inherent rule or principle at work.] It is almost always used as the first of three gerund phrases, namely, Lex orandi, lex credendi, lex vivendi,’ which translates as ‘the ruling principle of worship is the ruling principle of belief which is the ruling principle of life,’ or, using the gerundive force, ‘How one must worship is how one must believe and how one must live.’

The Romans 1:20 principle evident in Orthodox Christian worship — the layout out of the church and principal place of the iconostasis, the chant, the iconography, the chiastic structure of the three primary services, and the choreography of the priest, choir, and deacons — are reflected in the neptic-hesychastic beliefs of Orthodox Christians and way of life practices of the faithful; the absence of this principle in Catholic and Protestant worship, the lex orandi, is the great and substantive divide between the ‘right believers’ or ‘Orthodox’ and the ‘other-believers’ or ‘heterodox’ in creed or thinking and way of life.

Back to the fish!

Oranda, and I’m guessing here, probably comes from the bumps on the head of the fish which resemble a crown. This is a reach, I know, but given the symbolic meaning of fish to Christians, ichthys being an acronym for ‘Jesus Christ, Son of God’ and the ‘Jesus Fish’ being a cipher for the conjunction of two spheres, the meeting of heaven and earth in the God-man, a fun interpretation of oranda is ‘the fish who must be worshipped.’ See this post for the relevance of this symbol for understanding Rowling’s favorite painting and her own artistry. Given the discipline necessary to keep such a fish in clean water, maybe making those duties part of your prayer rule would be a good idea.

I have no idea, of course, if this has any correlation with why Rowling chose to include this Blue Oranda Goldfish in her twixter homepage header.

Beneath that header, Mrs Murray let her readers know that Hallmarked Man is still very much a work in progress. Even with the tease that Strike 8 will include the Strike fandom’s longed-for moment when “Strike and Robin finally fall into each other’s arms,” it looks like we won’t see the next installment in the series until well into 2025.

This time last year, we were just beginning to explore the depths (and the structure!) of Running Grave. It’s a bit unreasonable for readers to expect books of this length and quality to be produced on an annual basis. I’m going to assume, consequently, for my own mental health and in respect to the creative energy involved in writing these novels, that we will not have Hallmarked Man until next summer or even this time next year. An earlier publication date, holding to my new expectation, will only be a wonderful surprise.

Back to searching online for a 300 gallon Blue Oranda goldfish tank…

Rowling Slightly Arachnophobic?

J. K. Rowling put out two tweets yesterday that seemed to channel her inner Ron Weasley. She’s not transphobic, Islamophobic, or homophobic but it seems she has a healthy fear of a flood of spiders:

Watching that video, I confess to be a member of Team Jo if the entrance exam is alarm even while knowing it is just a film of large spiders on the wall.

Some of Rowling’s 14 million + followers on Twixter shared their stories of life with insects, especially a surprise flood of spiders:

The threads beneath these tweets are worth reading — lots of Great Australian memes and Rowling jokes.

Which is, I think, to say “Mission Accomplished.” Rowling went on offense in the transgender conflict earlier in the week and it seems probable that her PR team told her to lighten it up a bit, “You’ve got a book coming out soon, right, Jo, and a Bronte Studios adaptation? How about a silly tweet for a change-up, something with creepy crawly animals for a laugh?”

More on that switching of gears in the Gender-Sex is Real War in coming days and on Rowling’s very idiosyncratic feminism. Cheers!