Rowling’s Hallmarked Man and the Release Date

Way back in March 15th J. K. Rowling released the title of Strike 8 as The Hallmarked Man, an event that usually occurs shortly after the manuscript of the book is announced as finished. We first heard of her working hard on the book the previous May 7th, before The Running Grave was released. Most people who were tracking progress were fairly confident of an Autumn 2024 release. Those hopes have been dashed, and it now looks more and more likely we will have to wait for Autumn 2025. See below for Rowling’s tweets keeping the fandom updated on progress. One reason for the delay might be the revelation that she has six books in various stages of development, with the next non-Strike book likely to be a futuristic story that she has been planning for more than a decade!

Do you have more books in the pipeline?

I’ve got six books in my head. I’ve got the one I’m currently writing. There’ll be two more Strikes, and then there are three more books that I really want to get to. [She taps her head] I always gesture to the back of my head. I’m sure an MRI scan would prove it’s got nothing to do with the back of my brain, but I always find myself doing this when I’m talking about where it comes from. God knows. But I do have other stories in my head that I really need to get out.

The Times, May 5th 2024

 

 

Rowling Kicks John Oliver to the Kerb (Curb)

As part of America’s post election post mortem, liberal commentators are lining up to explain away the Republican loss. As a liberal in my later years, (a socialist in the UK, where we are less squeamish about using the word), I too am frustrated about the Harris campaign loosing the popular vote. Many have pointed to the push to eliminate sex as a category, instead of poorly defined and fluid gender, as one reason for Trump’s popularity among people less able to insulate themselves and their family from the effects of this policy. Popular comedian and commentator on Last Week Tonight, John Oliver, blamed Harris’s failure to respond to this question:

It was frustrating to see the Harris campaign fail to formulate a response, and its basically because its pretty easy to do… watch, I’ll do it for you right now…

As we have discussed before, there are vanishingly few trans girls competing in High Schools anywhere. Even if there were more, trans kids, like all kids vary in athletic ability, and there is no evidence they pose any threat to safety or fairness. It is very weird for you to be so focused on this subject, and finally if you genuinely what to address the biggest concern for most girls who play High School sport, you would be less worried about this, and more about the creepy assistant volleyball coach who keeps liking their posts from f*****g Instagram.

Mr. Oliver may believe that this is some fresh perspective, but in Britain, the – It doesn’t happen – Even if it does happen its not a problem – Even if it is a problem, its weird (and bigoted) of you to be focused on it – is depressingly familiar, and utterly unconvincing. Oliver has some history with J. K. Rowling, she was in the audience for his first appearance on US television, so it wasn’t a surprise when she responded:

Nothing about this feels good, because John Oliver generously gave his time for my charity Lumos and I liked him very much when I met him, but God knows, if you ever need an example of motivated reasoning and confirmation bias, this video’s for you. An undoubtedly intelligent person spouts absolute bullshit to support something he wants to be true, but isn’t.

According to the UN, female athletes have lost nearly 900 medals to trans-identified men competing against them in women’s sporting categories. Girls have been ousted from teams to make way for boys. Women have suffered serious injury playing against trans-identified men (see Payton McNabb, mentioned below).

Again and again I’ve come up against men who argue exactly what Oliver does here, using the very same talking points. With a straight face, the ‘believe the science’ guys will say ‘actually, we don’t yet have enough data to say whether men and boys are stronger and faster than women and girls’. The ‘be kind’ crew can’t see what the issue is. ‘Why are you bothered, it only affects a tiny minority of females?’

To prove to their progressive credentials – and (coincidentally, I’m sure) indemnify themselves against repercussions from cultural elites in the media, academia and publishing who’ve showed themselves more than ready to kick people to the kerb for failing to mouth the approved mantras – people with a lot to lose are currently prepared to make idiots of themselves. They’ll stare unabashedly into a camera and insist that their audiences’ eyeballs are incapable of seeing what’s plain as day, and that there’s something wrong with the great unwashed for believing that girls are being robbed of opportunities and put at physical risk.

If you want to tell the world you’re happy to watch females suffer injury, humiliation and the loss of sporting opportunities to bolster an elitist post-modern ideology embraced by a minute fraction of the world’s population, fair enough; you’re allowed your opinion. But if you’ve just told girls they don’t deserve fair sport, maybe rethink using all too real and common sexual predation against young women as a punchline for your ‘edgy’ closing joke.

No lengthy post on Twitter, in British English, is complete without someone forgetting that not everyone is American. This does however provide a rare example of someone receiving new information and accepting the correction. A great example to liberals and conservatives everywhere.

Rowling Tweets Call for Help in Finishing ‘Hallmarked Man,’ Adds Comic Tea Mug

On the down side of these messages, Rowling-Galbraith is still hard at work writing or revising Hallmarked Man.

The up side is definitely the caption to the cartoon on the mug. Beneath a picture of a puritan man with a lit torch in his hand and a woman tied to a post and standing on a pile of kindling, the cartoon has the guy about to light up a lady’s world say, “Let me start by saying that no one is a bigger feminist than me.”

Rowling Laughs about Objections to Her Involvement with Potter TV Adaptation

On 10 November Rowling tweeted a note about a response written about her comment that she was “very involved” in the HBO+ Bronte Studios adaptation of the Harry Potter novels for television and that she thought that adaptation is “going to be wonderful.” The respondent, whose identifying information was erased, wrote that this was not good news to him or her. Rowling thought this reaction was beyond laughable.

Why Rowling thought this response to her comment was funny to the point of hysterical we probably will never know. All we have is her statement that “I think I’ve pulled something from laughing,” her equivalent of ‘ROFLMAO.’

Maybe it’s because this involvement wasn’t especially news? After all, in September Rowling tweeted about the audition call for the three principal roles in the Hogwarts Saga. The disappointed tweeter couldn’t have been responding from shock at a revelation.

Could it be because Rowling thinks it very funny indeed that anyone after the last five years of threats and attempted ‘cancellation thinks she cares about objections to her involvement in adapting her own work? I mean, this aside from a disgruntled fan is part of a trend of former Potter-philes wishing this whole adaptation business would just fade away.

Or maybe Rowling is especially internet-savvy and recognized the phrase “My disappointment is immeasurable and my day is ruined” as an online topos or cliche that expresses ironic despair about a non-issue? [Read more…]

Rowling Makes Political Declaration: “Left-Leaning Liberal, Anti-Authoritarian, Anti-Ideology, and Fervent Idealist”

J. K. Rowling on 10 November 2024, the eve of Armistice Day, elected to go to war with those who insist that she is “far right.”

In a four-paragraph tweet she re-stated her political commitments and core beliefs in something of a manifesto. In brief, she identifies as a “left-leaning liberal,” one who is “fiercely anti-authoritarian,” and a woman who simultaneously “mistrust[s] ideologies” and those captured by their loyalties to same while remaining “an idealist” believing “in human beings” and our natural goodness.

The three most interesting pieces of this twixter declaration to me are (1) the aside vis a vis “anti-authoritarianism” that “if you couldn’t deduce that from my work than you haven’t understood a word of it,” i.e., “my works are transparencies of my core beliefs” (cf. Lake and Shed), (2) her admission that the political left with whom she continues to identify no longer exists but has been replaced by an “identity based strain of politics I consider elitist,” and (3) her insistence that there is “currently an assault on woman’s rights,” one “unparalleled in my lifetime” “coming from both left and right.” This last despite the election of a US President by a profound majority for these times in the popular vote and Electoral College, a candidate who since February 2023 at least has publicly espoused all of Rowling’s TERF war objectives as his platform, not to mention that he is not anti-abortion post Roe but wants UK/EU type limits on infanticide.

That third point suggests she is something of an ideologue herself politically, despite her affirmation that she mistrusts those “who deny a bit of inconvenient truth to keep their world view intact.” And, as for being radically “anti-authoritarian,” Rowling never encountered a Covid interdict and repressive measure that she didn’t applaud and publicly support 2020 to 2024. Can you say “Missing in Action”? There’s quite a bit of willful blindness in these statements, in other words, and my chief take-away is the literary rather than political point that this confusion and mélange of contradictory positions can be “deduced” from a close reading of her work.

The twixter thread beneath the post had some interesting if very cordial push-back on her statement, to which she responded generously and with characteristic good humor: [Read more…]