Robert-Galbraith.com Relationships Quiz and Pointer to Charlotte’s Bedales Time

I check the Robert Galbraith website every few months because, though I signed up for update messages to be sent to my email address, I have never received one. The posts there as a rule do not contain new information but the summaries given almost always reward a reading.

I learned, for example, from the ‘Charlotte and Strike’ page there that Milady Beserko had run away from the Bedales School at age fourteen. That detail is in the books  — “… made headlines in her youth when she went missing from Bedales for seven days, causing a national search… admitted to rehab at the age of 25…” (Silkworm, ch 24) — but it never caught my attention.

Turns out that school was not chosen at random or invented by the author but is a real place and a perfect match with what the godless Campbell aristocrats would think of as a perfect training ground for their offspring. 

Bedales — pronounced ‘Bee-dales’ — was completely secular, no chapel from the start, and co-educational, too, from the get-go and relatively “enlightened” about boy-girl relationships.

[Founder John] Badley took a non-denominational approach to religion and the school has never had a chapel: its relatively secular teaching made it attractive in its early days to non-conformists, agnostics, QuakersUnitarians and liberal Jews, who formed a significant element of its early intake. The school was also well known and popular in some Cambridge and Fabian intellectual circles with connections to the Wedgwoods, DarwinsHuxleys, and Trevelyans. Books such as A quoi tient la supériorité des Anglo-Saxons? and L’Education nouvelle popularised the school on the Continent, leading to a cosmopolitan intake of Russian and other European children in the 1920s.

I suppose, liberal and tony as the school seems to be, the question has to be why Charlotte would have felt the need to run away? We know Charlotte’s family was bonkers but that seems insufficient explanation for her peculiar madness. Some students have written about how they hated it there.

Is it credible that Charlotte, as with Strike and his itinerant childhood, Robin with the rape at university, and Rowling with her Bad Dad, is who she is consequent to abuse of some kind at her boarding school? As beautiful as she is, forgive me, it might be more remarkable even she hadn’t experience abuse or assault from an older student or from a teacher.

Check out the Wikipedia page for Bedales alumni and let me know if you recognize any characters that resonate with Charlotte Campbell.

All that to say that surfing the Robert-Galbraith site can trigger reflections on the story and characters you might not have had otherwise.

There’s also a Relationships Quiz which was fun. I got 19 out of 20 and I bet you can guess the one I missed (it’s the trick question meant to trip up know-it-alls that are in a hurry to finish the test as quickly as possible). I recommend you check it out, not only for the satisfaction of outscoring me, but also as a point of reflection.

As with the Charlotte and Cormoran page, the quiz emphasizes the relationships aspect of the story more than, y’know, the murder mysteries or the Leda Strike seeming-suicide. If you think that is accidental or an arbitrary emphasis, you’re making the mistake that kept me from the perfect score on the quiz! Cheers!

Shared Text: Hillary Clinton is Voldemort

American Democrats weaponized Harry Potter years ago. ‘Republicans for Voldemort’ bumper stickers, for example, were ubiquitous during the Obama years. It didn’t hurt that The Presence all but endorsed that meme:

The Chinese Communists, too, have enjoyed calling their enemies “the Dark Lord.” In 2014 it was Japan and in 2021 it was the United States. Leftists owned the field, it seemed, in energizing their base via Voldemort epithets.

Now, though, it seems the GOP is turning the tables on the Dumbledore’s Army division in the Democratic Party. For one thing, former Moaning Myrtle’s vocalist Nina Jankowicz has been forced to step down from her leadership position in the Biden Administration’s ‘Ministry of Truth.’ Now Hillary Clinton, of all people, has been branded with the Dark Lord sobriquet, ‘She Who Must Not Be Named.’

Fox News contributor Jonathan Turley predicted that Hillary Clinton will avoid “direct responsibility” for pushing claims of former President Trump’s collusion with Russia Friday on “Special Report.”

TURLEYHillary Clinton has always had a sort of Voldemort-like status of she who must not be named in a scandal. The Clintons have really been able to avoid direct responsibility in a series of scandals. And here was her campaign manager effectively dropping the dime on his former boss and saying, “Look, she approved it. She knew about it.” Now, the reason that’s important is that this claim was utterly ridiculous. It didn’t have a basis. It was quickly rejected by people in the government, and it was without any foundation when people looked at it. But the Clinton campaign pushed it anyway. This Alfa Bank story was pushed by Jake Sullivan, now the national security adviser, and by Clinton herself. But the thing to keep in mind is that President Obama was briefed when he was president, that Hillary Clinton was planning to make a Russian collusion claim against Donald Trump to try to sort of get out of her own email issues during the campaign. And we now have someone saying, “Yeah, she green-lighted the Alfa Bank claims,” which were completely without foundation. 

If you’re not up to speed on the story of how the Clinton campaign and the Dark Lady herself fed a story they knew to be false to the FBI and The New York Times in October 20126, you can read about it here and here. A short cut to the heart of it is on this Glenn Greenwald twitter thread:

This is a ‘Shared Text’ story, though, because, while I’m pretty sure that many of you picked up the ‘Ministry of Truth’ reference to Eric Blair’s 1984 above, I’m all but certain that every single listener to this Fox News broadcast segment ‘got’ what the talking head was saying when he called Madame Secretary Hillary Clinton “Voldemort-like” and “She Who Must Not Be Named.” Harry Potter, despite the transgender controversy and attempts to cancel J. K. Rowling, remains this generation’s (and the one or two before it?) Shared Text. Hat-tip to a friend in Texas for the FOX News story and link.

Fantastic Beasts: Secrets of Dumbledore Experiencing a Box Office Resurgence?

 

Elizabeth wrote me to say that she thinks Fantastic Beasts: Secrets of Dumbledore is showing signs of recovery evident in the chart above, that it might even be a sleeper hit now that it is at #5 in global box office. “Word is getting out about how good it is, and then we will have Streaming revenue sometime soon. There will be a whole group waiting just for that to happen.”

On the other hand, Nick Jeffery tells me “Dr Strange opened 3 weeks later and has twice the taking, but it’s still very difficult to work out if the film is making or losing money” and that twitter is aflame with this quotation from the CEO of Warner Brothers in a Wall Street Journal article:

 

I’m guessing we’ll have some information about the success or failure of Beasts 3 by the time Strike 5 is upon us. Not an “informed guess,” mind you, just a guess. Please share any data you have stumbled on relevant to the future of Beasts in the comment boxes below!

Surprised Grindelwald is Clairvoyant? That’s Not the Screenwriter’s Fault

Irvin Khaytman, author of Dumbledore: The Life and Lies of Hogwarts’s Renowned Headmaster and who writes at Mugglenet.com as ‘hpboy13,’ wrote a dyspeptic and dismissive review of Fantastic Beasts: The Secrets of Dumbledore. ‘The Real Secret is No One Cares’ begins with something like an assertion that Grindelwald’s ability to grasp the future in this film was inserted in the third film to explain the disconnectiveness of its own plot points:

while Secrets of Dumbledore is a VAST improvement over its predecessor… it still isn’t any good. To those withholding judgment from Crimes of Grindelwald in the hope that the franchise would course-correct enough to redeem that film, I would be very curious if that hope is still alive after this installment. Because while this film is not as bleak and boring as the last one, it still is in no way coherent.

The creators are aware of this and engage in a bit of lampshading to wave it away. Apparently, Grindelwald has the Sight or some magical ability to see the future. The only way to combat that is to have a plan that is so chaotic and makes so little sense that he won’t be able to puzzle out what’s going on. Yeah, sure, and that has nothing to do with heading off criticism that the events of the film are chaotic and make no sense!

If like me you did not know what “lampshading” is, the article to which Khaytman links defines it this way:

Lampshade Hanging (or, more informally, “Lampshading”) is the writers’ trick of dealing with any element of the story that threatens the audience’s Willing Suspension of Disbelief, whether a very implausible plot development, or a particularly blatant use of a trope, by calling attention to it and simply moving on.

The sarcastic conclusion that Grindelwald’s “magical ability to see the future” has been inserted here  to head “off criticism that the events of the film are chaotic and make no sense” takes as its unstated premise that we have not been told that Grindelwald has this ability until Beasts 3. Which is true.

But that isn’t Rowling’s fault. We know that this information was in the shooting script for the first Fantastic Beasts film, that the scene revealing this capability was shot, and that it was cut from that movie before its release. Kelly Loomis discovered this in December 2016 and it was written up here in a post titled Fantastic Beasts’ Seventh Deleted Scene Grindelgraves’ Vision in MACUSA Office.

This seventh deleted scene in Fantastic Beasts was one Kelly found in an interview Colin Farrel, the actor who plays Percival Graves in the movie, did with ‘Inside Reel.’ He says: [Read more…]

Rowling’s Love for ‘The Moving Finger’

This recent tweet from The Presence was not a revelation but a repetition of something she said to Val McDermid in 2014. I read Moving Finger in 2018 and discussed its importance to Serious Strikers in a post about the several important parallels between it and Cormoran’s adventures. Just for starters, can you say “faked suicide that is really a murder”?

I reproduce that post after the jump but you’ll want to read the comments from Strike Fans and myself at the original page for the full-influence dosage. If you want more about Rowling and Christie, the author with whom Rowling has the most in common, be sure to check out the seventeen posts on that subject at the Rowling-Christie Pillar Post. Enjoy! [Read more…]