News: Rowling Speaks on ‘Career of Evil’ Planning and Scaffolding at NPR

COEThis just in from ChrisC:

Just found two interesting links related to Career of Evil —

One is a series of interviews Ms. Rowling has given to NPR.  She seems to have given three consecutive chats, and each one I’ve listened to seem interesting.  Some of what she says may lend support to some of the ideas regarding Rowling’s themes for the Strike series:

http://www.npr.org/templates/search/index.php?searchinput=j.k.+rowling

Also, of final interest is this article for the Chicago Tribune that places Ms. Rowling in a long line of Women Mystery Writers:

http://www.chicagotribune.com/lifestyles/books/ct-prj-jk-rowling-women-crime-writers-20151029-story.html

All in all, there’s a lot to chew on, here.

[Note her comments about the “larger story arc” and the planning — “I worked exceptionally hard on the scaffolding,” comments which begin about 7:50 in the interview. Much more to say on this! John]

Guest Post: Horcruxes Origins and Timeline by P. Wayne Stauffer

f39174438Whence Horcruxes?
by P. Wayne Stauffer

As the Horcruxes began to surface in the Harry Potter stories, I wondered which characters died in their formation. Some were explicitly named; others not. To determine which characters died when Tom Riddle/Voldemort formed each of the Horcruxes, I ended up retracing Tom Riddle’s journey from orphan boy to Most Powerful Wizard (other than Albus Dumbledore…) for the order in which the Horcruxes were formed and a kind of chronology of Voldemort’s rise, fall, and return. Since the information about Voldemort presented in the Harry Potter saga is piecemeal and scattered throughout the seven books, I wanted to derive a continuous narrative of Tom Riddle’s younger years and his transformation into Lord Voldemort.

Much of this relies on inferences that piece together the “facts” of the overarching story across the seven books more than on a concise telling of the sequence by any character or the narrator (though Dumbledore comes close in his tutoring sessions with Harry in Prince). I am using only the information in the seven books, even though JK Rowling had significant input into the films and has posted more information about various characters since the publication of Deathly Hallows. I have not discovered a similar discussion of the formation of the Horcruxes or Tom Riddle’s timeline online or in print scholarly publications.

So, for anyone who is interested, here is my take on the victims and the order of formation of Voldemort’s seven Horcruxes. [Read more…]

Guest Post: On Oedipal Relationships in the Hogwarts Saga (Deborah Stokol)

horcrux-HarryOn Oedipal Relationships in Harry Potter
Deborah Stokol

Like many, Harry has an incredibly deep and important link to his mother. In his case, that link goes further than for most, though, in the sense that not only did she sacrifice her life to save his, and not only did that loving sacrifice give him the protection necessary to ensure his survival against and defeat of Voldemort, but the fact that he never met her forced him to imagine her as a perfect, idealized version of herself.

He also does not remember his father (a bold, intelligent, popular guy who, however, may not have been particularly nice or charitable on the microcosmic level, as we see from his treatment of the young Snape, unsavory as the latter may have been), but he, Harry, looks very much like him and wishes to be like the man who sired him, a man many remember as charismatic, athletic, and courageous (joining the Order of the Phoenix is not for the faint of heart).

Perhaps it stands to reason, then, that he should wish to repeat some of the aesthetic patterns his father began so as to reenact – yet improve – history. He did not get to know his parents, but he could be like them – in their more positive behavioral guises and in the life he could make in their stead that would complete, in a legacy-oriented fashion, their shortened one. [Read more…]

Guest Post: ‘Go Set a Watchman’ and the Loss of Literary Belief (Calderon)

Mockingbird bookGo Set a Watchman and the Loss of Literary Belief

Chris Calderon

“You think she’s racist?” That’s the question I might have asked if Go Set a Watchman had been released instead of its critically acclaimed rewrite, To Kill a Mockingbird. If Watchman had been released in 1960 and I’d been around at the time, I might have said I was in the hands of a very immature novice, one who may or may not share in some of the prejudices of her characters; it’s kind of hard to tell (I would have hypothetically said).

For the record, I don’t actually think that Nellie Harper Lee is in any way a segregationist. Her best and only work displays a mind that is too mature for such nonsense. This is what makes the shortcomings of a book like Go Set a Watchman all the more glaring in light of what it would become. In reading Watchman, it’s possible to tell what makes it a mediocre work in comparison with the powerhouse that is Mockingbird.

WatchmanI also notice a trend in the lengths some reviewers were willing to go in order to defend what’s really just an over-glorified first draft. I think an examination of both the draft and the response of certain readers, as well as a look at the peculiar circumstances surrounding Watchman‘s publication can shed light not just on the quality of Watchman as a novel, but also what it says about how modern audiences and even publishers look at the very concept of fiction.

An Overview

In terms of story, Go Set a Watchman is fairly straightforward. It tells the story of twenty-something Jean-Louise Finch, a displaced Southerner living in New York and perhaps a failed Bohemian (there really is nothing approaching the little rabble rouser nicknamed Scout, and what little there is proves to meager to save the proceedings) during a visit back to her old home town of Maycomb, Alabama. [Read more…]

Guest Post: City of Dreaming Books

City of Dreaming Books“Portrait of the Artist as a Young Dinosaur”: Writing and Imagination in Walter Moers’ The City of Dreaming Books

By ChrisC

Metafiction is hard to do. It’s also something that most readers aren’t familiar with. Metafiction is a sub-genre of literature that is perhaps best defined as “Fiction that is about the nature, art and craft of fiction, and its various elements (i.e. style, characterization etc.)”. Because of this, metafiction is actually more of a subject that can be fitted into the plot of any genre, whether it be fantastic or realistic.

Because metafiction is concerned with “the writing of fiction”, one of it’s greatest risks is that it can bore the audience. The simple fact is that while it’s possible to tell a story about the art of writing, very few seem able to pull it off in an effective way. That and the truth about creative writing is that for most authors, it consists of just sitting in front of a computer screen all day while either waiting or trying to have a good idea. That’s about it (almost) as far as the scribbling side of things goes (and it gets even worse if your story requires a bit of research, as most of them often do; lame perhaps, but true).

[Read more…]