It has happened at last.

The Orlando theme park, ‘The Wizarding World of Harry Potter,’ after being the site for and main attraction for HPEF and Leaky/Geeky Con fandom gatherings since 2010, has gone into the business of throwing conferences themselves. Seeing the push for hotel reservations in the ‘Vacation Packages’ that go on sale next week — read all about those here —  I’d guess that Geeky’s decision not to use the Universal Park hotels and their conference facilities in Orlando but the city’s convention center a short distance from the park inspired this move. They have a lot of hotel rooms to fill, and with the park as a magnet, why not throw a party? A party they can throw twice a year to huge crowds?

Which is not to mention the Hungarian Horntail in the Common Room: the new Universal Theme Park in Hollywood which opens in ‘Spring 2016’ and at which Leaky Con (the Harry Potter focused Geeky Con) is holding its big tent get-together next year. Time for Universal Orlando to create some new MoJo for the old park before the Snowbirds head west to the new 3-D experience rides…

If you check out the video below, you’ll note that it isn’t an academic conference in any sense of the word or even about the books. Like the two parks and the exposition hall, ‘The Wizarding World’ is all about the world as interpreted by Warner Brothers, with stars from the films (Michael Gambon! James and Oliver Phelps!) and nothing about the imaginative experience of the books that the parks so brilliantly displace.

Let’s be clear, though, about one thing. I’ve been to Orlando four times to give talks as a Featured Speaker at HPEF and Leaky Con gatherings. I am the only speaker I know of — please do let me know if this is no longer the case! — to have been invited to give a talk about the books inside Wizarding World (in ‘The Three Broomsticks,’ believe it or not). The park is a lot of fun and just being around hundreds of very serious Harry Potter fans, readers and film lovers, is an experience to have at least once.

And, if you have a choice, choose to do it in January rather than July. Just sayin.’

Here’s the video from this summer’s conference for a taste of what January’s gathering will be like:

The first issue of the new peer-reviewed Young Adult Literature journal, Study & Scrutiny, is now online.  According to the editors, the journal is intended to meet “a need for a new publishing outlet focused on extensive empirical and critical studies around YAL.”

I am happy to report that I have an article “Harry Potter and the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual” in the inaugural issue.  There are multiple other articles, as well, so everyone make like Hermione and head to the library!

Furthermore, the deadline for submitting articles for the next edition is September 1st.  I know we have a variety of scholars at various career levels among our readers; please consider contributing!

 

 

I had the following exchange with a student in the UK about ‘Christian Religion in Harry Potter.’ I have the student’s permission to re-print it here but s/he prefers to remain anonymous.

Dear Sir,

I am a student studying in England and am currently taking my A-levels. As part of this corse I am taking an Extended Project, which is worth half an A-level, and have decided to base it on Christian Religion in Harry Potter.

During my research for my project I have come across your name many times and, consequently, have bought and am reading your book ‘Looking for God in Harry Potter.’ It is an incredible piece of work and I am particularly interested in how you argue for Harry Potter as a good representation of Christianity.

I was wondering if you would be able to answer or give your opinion on a few questions of mine and whether you would know of anyone else who could also give their view? I am partially interested in the film series as I want to investigate the effect of people watching the film series without realising that they are subconsciously being exposed to Christian views.

I understand that you are very busy and even if you decline to answer my questions I would like to thank you for your consideration and your books!

[Name Withheld]

1. It is undeniable that throughout the Harry Potter films Christian religion is a major theme which the viewers are being exposed to unknowingly. What is your view on this? Is it justifiable for someone who is opposed to Christian religion to be subconsciously exposed to it?

What a hoot! Is it justifiable that non-believers tell their stories with their godless and materialist beliefs that someone with traditional views may be subconsciously exposed to?

Really, the question betrays overt hostility to Christians, the thought that they live to take over people’s lives and minds surreptitiously. Please note that the English literary tradition until the end of the Great War was exclusively books by Christians for Christians for their greater life in Christ. Are we to understand that writers now are obliged to forsake the great riches of those poems, plays, and novels and all the depths of redemption, resurrection, and revelry because a few atheists don’t want to be exposed to this pathogenic, religious virus?

Too funny.

2. What is your opinion on the view that Dumbledore, Harry and Fawkes the Phoenix represent the Holy Trinity?

In the climax “miles beneath Hogwarts” in Chamber of Secrets, that certainly seems credible. But that chapter is a specific Morality Tale or Everyman Drama in which these characters are those allegorical types. I wouldn’t extrapolate from that one scene to say the correspondents work across the whole series.

3. Would you consider Voldemort to be a representation of Lucifer considering part of his soul is in the serpent Nagini and the imagery the film produces of him seems to enhance his snake-like qualitys?

I suppose. But the Dark Lord is not an allegorical stick-man. He and Harry are anti-podes about what human beings can become based on the quality of their choices. Harry pursues an immortality based on sacrificial love, Voldemort on ego and self-importance. The tit for tat Lucifer correspondence doesn’t bring that out very well.

4. Do you think Harry represents the fall of humanity, as depicted in St Augustines theodicy, by containing a part of Voldamort’s soul, which is then destroyed and Harrys soul is returned to perfection and any corruption or evil temptation is removed?

The idea works, I suppose, but I struggle to think of the Hogwarts Saga as an Augustinian text. Have you read the Rev Dr Danielle Tumminio’s book, God and Harry at Yale? It discusses just this subject at some length.

5. Would you consider Harry to be an unattainably and unrealistically perfect character as he never gives in to temptation or seems to stray from the path of good?

Huh? I’m asked regularly by Harry Haters how I can in good conscience recommend Harry’s adventures to young people because of his proclivity for breaking rules, telling lies, and being disrespectful to his teachers (and any other adult he does not like). He’s a “perfect character” only in the sense that he conforms to all the rules of both the Schoolboy Novel genre and, oddly enough, of Gothic heroines. See Harry Potter’s Bookshelf for all that.

S/he sent me a wonderfully kind thank you note for these responses (and the five Potter Pundits I urged her to contact for a more thoughtful set of answers), which were, to my surprise, what s/he wanted:

This Guest Post and brilliant ring exegesis is from Susan Raab (SusanRaab.com), a marketing strategist, high-conversion copywriter and best selling ghostwriter who not-so-secretly (she told me!) prefers reading the latest HogPro recommendation late into the night, or teaching another “Christian Content in Harry Potter” class for her contemplative prayer group, or architecting ring structure for her own book (not as easy as it looks).

Emma, Belle and Rings

With the news that Emma Watson has been cast as Belle in the upcoming live version of Disney’s Beauty and the Beast, the Internet has developed a rash of comparisons between Hermione and Belle.

Beauty and the Beast shares a lot more with Harry Potter than just Emma Watson.

Have you ever noticed that as musical theater, Beauty and the Beast is virtually indestructible?

A couple of summers ago, our local outdoor theater company produced it with local talent, and the result was more than a little rough around the edges.  But the truth is, no one’s gloomy or complaining when the flatware’s entertaining… especially with knives, forks, spoons and salt and pepper shakers gleefully skipping about, all under the age of eleven and terminally cute. And those napkins! Completely adorable. Well, be that as it may… it drew more patrons and made more money than any other family show since the last time it was produced, beating Peter Pan, Shrek, Once Upon a Mattress and others less memorable.

So WHY is Beauty and the Beast indestructible, even by the most rank of local talent? Faithful readers of Harry Potter as Ring Composition and Ring Cycle will not be surprised… yes, there’s a ring in there, even in musical theater. Here’s the illustration, John Granger style.

This didn’t happen by accident.  I’m sure Howard Ashman & Linda Woolverton created this symmetry intentionally.  And that whoever is chosen to direct this movie will not be able to screw it up!

I look forward to this great story’s continuing edification of those who choose to believe in the power of love in your heart.