Marathon Movie Madness for Muggles: February Features First Four Films

It’s a commonplace when old fans meet more recent Potter-philes that the one group says, “You can’t imagine what it was like not knowing how it ended, waiting on each new book…” The newbies are usually very polite about the smugness; I hope the old hands are as courteous when the readers “who didn’t have to wait” come up with insights that no one has noticed until now.

Believe me, it happens. I have a new friend to whom I am impatiently waiting to introduce you whose understanding of the theological underpinning of Harry Potter startled me, a feeling of “How did I miss that?” I haven’t had since reading chapter four of Beatrice Groves’ Literary Allusion in Harry Potter.

I thought of the differences between the four generations of Potter Pundits this morning when I learned that Warner Brothers will be re-releasing the first four adaptations of the Hogwarts Saga novels in February for experiencing on the Big Screen. From Collider:

Get ready to dust off your wands and step back into the Wizarding World, because the first four Harry Potter films are set to return to theaters nationwide in 2025, offering fans a chance to experience the magic on the big screen once again. But this time, there’s a special dusting of magic, as select screenings will be available in immersive formats like 3D and 4DX, bringing the beloved fantasy franchise to new formats but to the same audiences who have loved them for years.

Fathom Events is taking charge of a re-release, along with Warner Bros., to bring Harry Potter and the Sorcerer’s StoneHarry Potter and the Chamber of SecretsHarry Potter and the Prisoner of Azkaban, and Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire back to multiplexes, starting on February 13, 2025. After that, the movies will be shown sequentially over three consecutive weekends, running from Thursdays through Sundays, and it will also mark the 20th anniversary of Harry Potter and the Goblet of Fire, which originally premiered in 2005.

So, this is how it will work. At the end of February, every Thursday from the 13th forward will be a showing of Sorcerer’s Stone, every Friday Chamber of Secrets, every Saturday Prisoner of Azkaban, and every Sunday Goblet of Fire, the last Saturday and Sunday being in March. There will be three run-throughs of the first four films, which, if you’re loaded with Galleons, you can catch three times each or any variety of different ways (the one thing you cannot do is watch Goblet on the first Sunday and then catch the films in reverse order back to Stone, which would be a Time Turner trick of sorts).

For fans that are giving this a big yawn, the studio is introducing new big screen formats that weren’t available 2000 to 2005 when these films were first released.

I’m not a big fan of the adaptations. I suspect, though, that I may go with some friends to watch these new releases, if only to talk about where we were when we first saw each. Yes, it’s fan servicing and a money-grab that has next to nothing to do with Goblet’s twentieth anniversary (do people really observe those kinds of dates for movies?). It could nonetheless be an occasion for some great story-telling across fandom generations. I’d love to read if you might be going to one of these new releases in the comment boxes.

Rowling Posts New Twitter Header, Strike Fandom Identifies, Strike9 to be in York

Rowling posted a new twixter home page photo and cameo yesterday and Strike fandom was all over it in a heartbeat. Ludicrous Moniker and Badly Wired Lamp identified it as the Minster in York:

Ludicrous Moniker recalled that a page of a York guidebook was posted on the Robert Galbraith website:

The question was raised during discovery about whether York would be featured in The Hallmarked Man or the as yet untitled Strike 9. Rowling was listening in, apparently, and answered the question:

Hats off to Ludicrous Moniker and the other Serious Strikers on Twixter for tracking this down and for prompting that helpful response from Rowling-Galbraith!

For the complete catalog of Rowling’s twixter homepage pictures compiled by Nick Jeffery with helpful information about the readers who identified each and links to discussion online of what they mean, see ‘All J. K. Rowling’s Twitter Headers.’

Rowling Celebrates Gurvin Chopra

Read the BBC version of the Chopra’s family inspiring story, ‘It’s an Honour and a Privilege to be Educated.’

R. I. P. Jules Feiffer, Illustrious Satirist

Jules Feiffer died on 17 January this year at age 95 and I have to confess I was surprised to learn he lived to see 2025. The name in the obituary and the books associated with it in my deepest of my memories drew me back more than fifty years, a startling experience akin to a stray scent causing an avalanche of associations with a lost friend or a forgotten event.

Reading the obituaries online, I learned how other people remembered him. As a cartoonist for Playboy magazine, as a satirist of the English Punch tradition whose ‘strips’ in The Village Voice, even The New York Times, were biting and pointed simultaneously, as the screenwriter for films such as Carnal Knowledge: he had a full life of notable achievements, in other words, besides working on two books that shaped my life so intimately.

The first was the illustrations he did for Norton Juster’s The Phantom Tollbooth in 1961, the year I was born. It is the first book I can remember reading, though it’s safe to say I had read all the Dr Seuss classics, the Beginner Books series, and maybe even a few Hardy Boys serials before I met Milo, Tock, and the Humbug. I can’t even guess how many times I read it as a boy or as a dad excited to share it with my children. More recently I bought my daughter Sarah the annotated edition of Tollbooth to read to her three children and she was as thrilled and excited about that present as I can remember her being when we finally spent money we didn’t have to get her a flute equal to her zeal for the instrument.

The Phantom Tollbooth, in brief, was my doorway to thinking about words, stories, and books, and it was for my children as well, perhaps the entrance for several generations of readers — and Feiffer’s sketchy illustrations, the barest of line drawings really, are indelibly linked to that never-ending adventure in imagination. I only learned this morning that Feiffer was Juster’s roommate at the time he wrote the book and played a larger part in its writing than an illustrator might otherwise have. It makes sense that all the word play in Tollbooth might have sprung from puns shared by two friends in a months long conversation, one that bent my brain to thinking about words-about-words in a story about the story experience.

The second was Feiffer’s collation and annotation of The Great Comic Book Heroes, a book that came out in 1965 and I received as a Christmas gift sometime in the early 1970s. Its subtitle is one of the best ever: “the Origins and Early Adventures of the Classic Super-Heroes of the Comic Books, in Glorious Color.” I loved comic books as a child and young man, especially the super-hero variety if I also read the Charlton and Archie books as well. DC’s Batman was a favorite and I was blessed to grow up during the silver age of the several titles for that character, the 70s era of writer Dennis O’Neil and artist Neal Adams, that almost made up for the camp television series of that time.

Feiffer’s over-sized book, a collection and reprinting of the earliest comic books of my favorite heroes with his helpful commentary and introductions, made me think for the first time about comics as a genre of story, one that had historical beginnings and a rainbow variety of possible meanings in the hands of different writers and artists, no where more obvious than in the Batman series. The Great Comic Book Heroes is also where I learned that my given name, ‘Alan Scott,’ was from the golden age or original Green Lantern, a revelation that astonished me because of my father’s disinterest in any kind of fiction or reading, really, beyond news magazines (it turns out, he picked the name up from a comic book he looked at while waiting for a haircut).

Feiffer’s Comic Book Heroes in “Glorious Color” was a beautiful book that my mother was happy to include on the living room glass-topped coffee-table with other over-sized photo collections that were popular at the time. It was always at hand, consequently, which led to repeated revisits and re-readings. I have to think now that it was an invisible influence on my thinking about stories, writers, and that this was a field to be interpreted and understood better, at a depth different than the delightful unconscious imaginative experience.

I doubt I would have liked Jules Feiffer, just as I’m pretty sure I would have been very uncomfortable talking with Ted Geisel (‘Dr Seuss’). I am saddened by his death, nonetheless, because I never expressed to the man, one I assumed had died ages ago, my gratitude for Tollbooth and The Great Comic Book Heroes. He changed my life, or, better, he helped shape it at its beginnings, and all the friendships I have had inside books and with other readers talking about those stories since to some degree I owe to him. Memory eternal!

 

Rowling Mocks Leftists Consumed by Nazi Salute, Who Call Enemies ‘Hitler’

In an Inauguration Day rally, Elon Musk spoke to a crowd of Trump supporters at DC’s Capitol One arena. During his brief talk, he twice bumped his chest and threw out his right arm to the crowd, once to the group in front of him and immediately after to the crowd behind him. He said just before this talk that he was giving thanks from his heart to all those who had worked and prayed and contributed to Trump’s electoral college and popular vote triumph last November.

The American Public Broadcast Service (PBS), a news organization funded by tax payers as well as private donors and corporations, tweeted that Musk’s gesture was a “Nazi” salute, a la Hitler’s Sieg Heil arm motion and the Italian fascist ‘Roman’ gesture. The Anti-Defamation League (ADL), a watch-dog for Neo-Nazi behaviors and anti-Semitism, immediately responded that Musk’s gesture had been misinterpreted by PBS and that, stressful as the transfer of power was for many in the US, a little grace was in order. It was not, from their view, a “Nazi salute.”

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (‘AOC’), an American politician and activist serving since 2019 as the U.S. representative for New York’s 14th congressional district, weighed in to condemn both Musk for the salute and the ADL for being ‘soft’ on Nazi-ism (!). (She was not at the inauguration or any of the balls afterward because “I don’t celebrate rapists.”) Firebrand and catnip that she is to friends and foes respectively, her branding Musk’s gesture as a sure sign that he is a closet fascist showing his true colors generated the inevitable memes of other politicians, to include AOC, extending their arm in that fashion while speaking to the public. Historians of twentieth century totalitarianism, most notably Gerald Posner and Niall Fergusson, dismissed AOC as a partisan crank.

I share all that because Joanne Rowling Murray (‘JKR’) teamed up with Gender Critical feminists to mock on Twixter those Progressive gate-keepers who make risible historical analogies. These “TERFS” as a rule who have spent the last five years being branded by leftists as “Nazis,” “fascists,” even “Holocaust deniers” because of their resistance to “transgenderism.” JKR’s preferred partner in these staged satirical conversations, as we’ve seen earlier this month, is Julie Bindel, who wrote Rowling with a true confession about her struggle with Nazi salutes:

[Read more…]