Rowling A-List Poet Discovery: Keats!

Dr Beatrice Groves, Research Fellow and Lecturer at Trinity College, Oxford, and author of Literary Allusion in Harry Potter, has discovered clues that strongly suggest that Rowling (as well as her friend Sean Harris) had John Keats on her A-Level reading list as the featured poet.

In a Bathilda’s Notebook post, ‘Keats, “The Eve of St. Agnes,” and “Harry Potter”,’ Groves shares, in addition to a host of fascinating possible allusions to Keats in Rowling’s work, visible evidence that Rowling is a serious reader of John Keats, namely, a 2017 tweet from the Keats-Shelley House of their July 2015 Visitor’s Log page:

Groves deciphers in her post what Rowling, Neil Murray, and Sean Harris wrote and explains its significance of this discovery, a gem, as she notes, that “has not previously been noticed by anyone in the Harry Potter fandom.” She ends her exegesis with a pointed plea to readers that I wish to amplify here for readers who might not see it on Groves’ Notebook page at MuggleNet:

Rowling has never made an explicit reference to Keats in either her writing or interviews (nothing like the hat-tip to Jane Austen in the naming of Mrs. Norris, for example). This has made it more difficult to argue for Keats allusions than those of her acknowledged influences such as Shakespeare, Collette, or Dickens. But Keats is an absolute stalwart of the English literature curriculum in the UK: I have long suspected that Rowling studied him as part of her English A-level course – and, recently, I finally found the proof [in the 2017 tweet above]! Rowling has indeed long read and loved Keats; she studied him at A-Level, and hence he has been part of her literary consciousness for all her writing life….

I suspect that if we were to track down Rowling’s A-level syllabus, we’d find that “La Belle Dame sans Merci,” Lamia, and The Eve of St. Agnes were all part of the course. (Tracking this down, incidentally, is one of my long-term aims – and it is proving surprisingly difficult! If you or someone you know took English A-level in the 1980s and studied The Winter’s TaleKing Lear, and Keats – the three texts we now know she studied – I’d be very interested to hear from you – especially if you remember what your exam board was or the rest of the syllabus you studied!).

Do read the whole St Agnes post for Groves’ explanation of the importance of this discovery — and, if you have the information about Rowling-era A-Lists in the UK she asks for, please contact her via the email address at her Oxford University home page.

Congratulations to Dr Groves on this important find and an oversized thank you to her for sharing the allusions to Keats embedded in Rowling’s work that only a true Keat-ophile could have spotted! I love the suggestion in the 2017 tweet from the Keats-Shelley house that Rowling chose the phantom ‘K’ initial in her first pseudonym, ‘J. K. Rowling’ (she has no given middle name) as a tribute to the original J. K., John Keats.

Links to all of Dr Groves’ online writings can be found at this HogwartsProfessor.com ‘Beatrice Groves Pillar Post‘ page.

Rowling Tweets on Strike Psyche Profile

This too brief but fascinating look at Strike’s psychological make-up by Robert Galbraith herself came at the end of an equally intriguing thread about Hannah Arendt, Eichmann, and the banality of evil “transgender” fellow-travelers.  That longer effort of Rowling’s deserves its own post; today let’s look at the one-off response to someone who engaged Mrs Murray about Arendt. Three thoughts?

(1) Strike Laid Bare: Rowling-Galbraith tells us point blank Strike’s strengths and weaknesses, and, in that exposure suggests strongly the direction of his transformation. “One of the reasons I enjoy writing him is that while he’s fairly honest with himself, he can still be blinkered about his own motivations and the extent to which the past is influencing his present behaviour.” Strike is about to be confronted in inescapable fashion, I think it safe to say, with “his own motivations” which will reveal to him the “extent to which the past is influencing his present behavior.” His ability to change in that crucible will be critical to his relationship with Robin.

(2) Strike and Rowling Agree:  “Character is destiny” but… (Strike) “strokes of unearned good fortune and bad luck may hit anyone, irrespective of character” and (Rowling) “accidents of birth, chance and mischance shape all of our lives, too, and may overwhelm the strongest personalities.” Rowling’s artistry is depicting the morality of archetypal characters when challenged by “past and present context,” depictions of behavior for our reflection, empathetic identification, and cathartic experience. Again, Strike is about to be hit betwen the eyes with all that he has neglected in the “accidents of birth,” Strike’s being a supposedly ‘accidental birth,’ and perhaps by the “chance and mischance” of losing Robin to another man. I for one can’t wait.

(3) A Lake Point? Joanne Rowling was not born with a silver spoon for her porridge but “character” and writing genius as well as “chance and mischance” have brought her to the heights of fame, fortune, and notoriety coupled with adulation, albeit in different spheres. I think it is credible, as a reflective woman experienced in Cognitive Behavior Therapy and one who has studied psychology as an amateur, that Rowling thinks about her life, its twists and turns and tumbles and triumphs, more than most. And that this reflection on the tension between “character” and the “context” of “past and present” circumstances informs her Strike novels as something like an axis.

Hence the importance of this seeming off the cuff or throw-away look at Strike’s psychological perspective. Footnote it for reading before and after Hallmarked Man!

Rowling Tweets about Trump Executive Order Contra Gender Theory Ideology

President Donald J. Trump signed an Executive Order today only hours after his inauguration, one titled, “DEFENDING WOMEN FROM GENDER IDEOLOGY EXTREMISM AND RESTORING BIOLOGICAL TRUTH TO THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT.” As he pledged during his campaign almost a year ago, Trump delivered on “Day One” a Gender Critical feminist ‘magic wand’ wish list. Read the whole thing at the WhiteHouse.gov link above, but here is a handy summary of “Defending Women:”

Responses from Gender Critical feminists varied in their enthusiasm for this breakthrough Executive Order that sets the cause of Transgender Radical Activists back to zero.

On the one hand, many women lauded Trump for delivering on his pledge to “defend women” and “restore biological truth:”

Other feminists chose to lament that, though Trump’s Executive Order delivered everything that the Gender Critical community could have wanted from an American politician, that this man they despise was the one to do it.

Rowling tweeted about the “Defending Women” Executive Order in response to a Susan Dalgety tweet on the subject.

Dalgety, the editor of The Women Who Wouldn’t Weesht, despises Trump. Her twixter feed during Trump’s inaugural address featured a series of tweets that snarkily dismissed his pledges to pursue American energy independence (“Fuck the planet“), to “bring back law and order to American cities” (“Says the first convicted felon to be POTUS“), and to “extend our territories” even to Mars (“Thank you says Musk“). She even chose to mock Trump’s ‘air kiss’ to his wife with the suggestion that she wore a broad brimmed hat to prevent him from landing lips on her face (“Form meets function” reposted from ‘The Daily Show’). Most revealing, perhaps, of her Trump Derangement Syndrome was her tweeting “Crazy Stuff” as her verdict on his judgement that he was “saved by God to make America great again.”

Dalgerty’s take on the “Defending Women” Executive Order? Predictable — ‘It’s okay, but, y’know, Trump:’ [Read more…]

Is America’s Favorite Gender Critical Feminist Katie Hopkins or J. K. Rowling?

Katie Hopkins, perhaps the UK’s most outlandish stand-up comedian and shock-jock news commenter whose Instagram following is well over a million people, has landed in the United States to attend the inauguration of President Trump. She posted on her daily ‘Batshit Bonkers Britain’ (BBB) observations about a feminist protest march in DC this week (above) in a way that showcased her take no prisoners, suffer no nonsense commentary about the Gender Ideology true believers.

I couldn’t help but notice the correspondence between Hopkins’ post about a “transgender woman’s” claim to be suffering from polycystic ovary syndrome and Rowling’s December 2019 tweet that recreated her public image and blew up her status as a progressive icon:

A quick search shows that Rowling, as you probably expected, is not a Katie Hopkins fan. In 2017, when Hopkins reported that Britons were “cowed” following the knife attacks on Westminster, Rowling compared her to a famous American champion of appeasement. Hopkins has called London “Londonistan” and “Stab City” because of the attacks by machete wielding Muslims there. Per The Independent: [Read more…]

Rowling Bankrolls Gender Critical Resistance in UK and Australia

Today Rowling retweeted an X posting by Julie Bindell that included her recent podcast comments about Pink News, an interview she chose to caption with the brief and terse, “I sued Pink News.”

It was not news per se but Rowling’s retweeting it included her back and forth replies to Bindell that of course went out to Rowling’s 14 million plus followers on that platform. It had a startling finish:

The “shocked” bit is evidently sarcasm, meaning “this was very well known and you know very well how involved I was in that suit.” Bindel’s “I don’t like to mention it” is similarly sarcastic; she is not one to suffer injuries or fools quietly (her courage in reporting the Muslim rape gangs for many years speaks to her temperament in this regard). Rowling segues from that false humility or reserve to the subject of her having been rumored to be bankrolling this lawsuit against Pink News, which Bliden confirms.

And then Rowling drops what seems to be the point of the re-tweeting and the entire exchange. “I feel today’s a really good day to let the delightful Cohen and James know I was indeed backing you.” Rowling as a rule does not flaunt her private generosity in public. What has happened to make 18 January a “really good today” to reveal that she had been paying Blindel’s significant legal costs in her battle against Pink News, costs that would otherwise have bankrupted the independent journalist?

Two explanations are credible, I think.

The first is that this is Pink News specific. The two owners of this LGBTQ+ publication are facing a landslide of allegations from former employees of sexual misconduct and, at best, a “hostile work environment.” If you listen to the Blindel podcast comments about Pink News, the edited version makes sure to highlight Blindel’s comments that Pink News published almost 700 articles about J. K. Rowling to defame her as a “transphobe,” “bigot,” and “TERF.” Today would be the day to reveal to “Cohen and James” that their attempt to wait out Blindel and bankrupt her in a kind of “lawfare” had failed because the journalist had the barracuda barristers of a billionaire at her side; their fall from grace, Rowling seemed to think, was the right moment to reveal a la the Count of Monte Christo who their real persecutor is.

Hence the popularity of this meme today:

The message seems to be Rowling telling those who come for her that actions have consequences, i.e.,  F. A. F. O.

That makes sense except that the Pink News story is more than a week old by BBC time and Rowling said “today’s a really good day” to reveal she had Blindel’s back in this court case. This is beside the points that Rowling is not given to either flashing her generosity for social media credit or doing end zone dances. Why “today,” then?

Check out this story today in the UK Daily Mail about a Gender Identity case in the Australian courts: [Read more…]