Shared Text: Hogwarts and Romantasy

Alex Berenson was a reporter for The New York Times who graduated from investigative journalism into life as a novelist (see ‘John Wells‘). He is more famous, I think today for his forays back into exposing shibboleths as myths — most notably, the beliefs that marijuana is a harmless ‘recreational drug,‘ that the mRNA jabs were “safe and effective,” and that we can trust the government to police free speech to protect us from “misinformation” — but I was struck by this tweet he made yesterday for three reasons.

First, there’s the ‘Shared Text’ thing, right? Rebecca Yarros’s books are fantasy novels  — dragons! — but that’s about all that they have in common with Harry Potter. Berenson, though, when wanting to make a point about ‘Romantasy‘ books, which is to say, ‘romance novels with adult sex openly depicted, not safe for work or bedtime reading, he invokes the fantasy series with which he can be confident everyone of his readers is familiar.

Next, there was my realization that Berenson is absolutely clueless about the “girls who read Harry Potter 20 years ago.” His unstated suggestion is that they weren’t interested in sex in their fantasy fiction back in the day but “have grown up and graduated to” Romantic Fantasy novelsHarry Potter fans twenty years ago were consumed by ‘shipping in the series, so much so that the most popular type of fan fiction involved relationships between characters that were anything but Platonic and as often as not sexually perverse. ‘Slash,’ as it was known, was a staple of conversation and programming at fandom conferences. I succeeded in dodging all that, but there was no way to avoid awareness of it as a fandom focus.

Finally, I confess to being more than a little put off by Berenson’s snobbery about the Potter novels and about Yarros’s work, of which I was until this tweet blissfully ignorant. It is hard to miss the suggestion that to him the Hogwarts Saga is kid kit akin to Easy Readers, Nancy Drew, or Enid Blyton books, something real readers ‘grow out of.’ It reflects the truism that ignorance and arrogance are Siamese twins as well as the shibboleth still omnipresent despite being repeatedly punctured that popular fiction with extraordinary sales and international reach is necessarily not very good. See Lev Grossman’s comments about the elitist aversion to Twilight as being little more than laziness posturing as refined taste; Berenson’s tweet seems a case study in the attitude Grossman described.

Which is not to say that Yarros’s books are high art. As noted, I have no idea and I confess that ‘Romantasy’ as a concept reminds me, perhaps fatally in terms of my ability to give it a fair reading, of Harry Potter ‘Slash’ fan fiction.

What I am saying is that popular fiction, as Dickens, Hemingway, Lewis, Tolkien, Rowling, Collins, and, yes, Stephenie Meyer have proven, can be very, very good indeed. I’m glad Rowling grew up and graduated (sic) to the Strike-Ellacott novels from her Wizarding World diamond mine — and I really think those detective novels hinge as they do on the forever incipient nature of the partners’ romance because of lessons she drew drew from Harry Potter fandom’s fixation on ‘shipping. As good as the Cormoran Strike series gets, however, its “adult” conversations and scenes won’t be what makes it as profound or better than the Potter novels.

Rowling Mourns Marianne Faithfull; Confirms Rokeby-Jagger Parallel Life in Leda Strike’s Real Life Analogue?

Marinanne Faithfull, English pop icon with a history eerily reminiscent of Leda Strike’s, died yesterday, age 78. J. K. Rowling promptly tweeted the message above and retweeted a similar note from the Rolling Stones. Three quick notes:

(1) Broken English Rowling Readers learned in Troubled Blood about the author’s admiration for Joni Mitchell and especially her Court and Spark album. Mitchell, a later in life discovery for Mrs Murray, joined the short list of popular music groups that we knew were Rowling favorites from her youth (e.g., The Smiths, Siouxsie and the Banshees). Until today, I don’t think she’s mentioned Marianne Faithfull or this “all time” “favorite album,” Broken English. If, like me, this album was new to you, here is the title track and the controversial ‘Why D’ya Do It?’ from that disc:

Rowling was not alone in loving Broken English, Faithfull’s comeback album and consensus “masterpiece.” From the Wikipedia article about it:

Broken English received critical acclaim. It peaked at number 82 on the Billboard 200, becoming her first album to chart in the United States since Go Away from My World (1965) and giving Faithfull a first nomination for the Grammy Award for Best Female Rock Vocal Performance. It reached number 57 in the United Kingdom and entered the top five in Germany, France and New Zealand. Broken English was certified platinum in Germany and France, and sold over one million copies worldwide. Two singles were released from the album, with “The Ballad of Lucy Jordan” peaking at number 48 on the UK Singles Chart. The album was included on NME magazine’s list of “500 Greatest Albums of All Time” and in the book 1001 Albums You Must Hear Before You Die…. In 1981, Faithfull was nominated for the Grammy Award for Best Female Rock Vocal Performance for this album.

Released in late 1979, if we take Rowling’s broken heart emoji on today’s tweet seriously, she was listening to Broken English at the critical time of her adolescence in Tutshill through at least her days at the University of Exeter. This ‘find’ is not going to displace Austen, Shakespeare, or even Wodehouse on the list of Rowling’s greatest literary influences, but I wonder if it might rank with her recently discovered favorite, John Keats? Serious Readers of Rowling, especially those who track her signature intertextuality, are obliged, I think, to give this album, perhaps all of Faithfull’s work, a close listen.

(2) The Life of Marianne Faithfull

Broken English, as mentioned, was a “comeback” effort for the artist, whose life had fallen to the depths. Again, via Wikipedia:

Broken English was Faithfull’s first major release since her album Love in a Mist (1967). After ending her relationship with Mick Jagger in 1970 and losing custody of her son, Faithfull suffered from heroin addiction and lived on the streets of London. Severe laryngitis and drug abuse during this period permanently altered Faithfull’s voice, leaving it cracked and lower in pitch. She attempted a comeback in 1976 with Dreamin’ My Dreams, which achieved only minor success. Shortly afterwards, Faithfull began working with musician Barry Reynolds, who produced the songs “Broken English” and “Why D’Ya Do It?”. The demos attracted the attention of Chris Blackwell who signed Faithfull to his record label Island Records.

How low had she fallen?

Faithfull ended her relationship with Jagger in May 1970 after she started an affair with Anglo-Irish nobleman “Paddy” Rossmore. She also lost custody of her son in that same year, which led to her attempting suicide. Faithfull’s personal life went into decline, and her career went into a tailspin. She made only a few appearances, including an October 1973 performance with David Bowie, singing Sonny & Cher’s “I Got You Babe”.

Faithfull lived on London’s Soho streets for two years, suffering from heroin addiction and anorexia nervosa. Friends intervened and enrolled her in an NHSheroin-assisted treatment programme. She failed at controlling or stabilising her addiction at this time. In 1971, producer Mike Leander found her on the streets and made an attempt to revive her career, producing part of her album Rich Kid Blues. The album was shelved until 1985….Faithfull squatted in a Chelsea flat without hot water or electricity with then-boyfriend Ben Brierly of the band the Vibrators.

Faithfull had three miscarriages and four abortions. The first abortion was in 1965, when she had become pregnant by Gene Pitney; the procedure was still illegal in the United Kingdom at the time and Faithfull stated that she had a hard time dealing with the guilt. She began to feel better once her son was born the year after. Subsequent terminations were from her period of drug abuse as she did not wish for the children to be born as addicts

She not only survived these depths, she became something of a legend, both as lyricist, performer, and writer (her several straight-from-the-hip memoirs were all best sellers). Faithfull’s remarkable and forceful personality, evident in this 2018 Guardian profile, ‘Marianne Faithfull: “This is the most honest record I’ve made. It’s open-heart surgery, darling”,’ reminded me repeatedly of Rowling; I thought more than once, “This might be what Rowling sounds like at age 80.”

“It’s literally a pain to fucking do anything,” she says, settling in her seat with Miriam’s help. She’s brought a fan, plus a plate of mango, cut into tiny pieces, which she lifts to her mouth to reach the final bits (“excuse me for being disgusting”). She then smokes a cigarette slowly: she started again a few years ago. “It’s the last thing I do. I don’t even drink coffee any more!” She sighs, theatrically. “Everything fucking hurts. But you try and fucking stop me.”…

What does she think of similar revelations after the #MeToo campaign? Her response is odd: “I couldn’t give a flying fuck.” Really? “No.” But when other women are honest, like you were, are you glad? “Yeah, I’m very glad. Proud. About fucking time! Women spend their lives just trying to please men.” Isn’t that you endorsing what they’re doing? She shrugs, still smiling. “Whatever!”

Instead, Faithfull tells me about her Austrian mother, Eva von Sacher-Masoch, and Jewish grandmother, Flora, who brought her up in an ordinary terraced house in Reading after her parents divorced. Her mother had been an actress and dancer before the second world war; she had lived with her mother in Vienna during it, being protected from the Nazis thanks to their aristocratic background. “But when the Russians entered Vienna, my mother and grandmother were raped, and after that my mother got pregnant and had an abortion. Then the next thing that happened – which always happens – is that she really wanted another baby. Then she met my father, and I think she thought that he would be a great father for a baby, and so she married him and they had me.”

They split up six years later. “It was probably all for the best,” Faithfull says, “and I would be a different person [if they’d stayed together]. I probably wouldn’t have hated men so much! But, you know, Mum needed me.” Faithfull adds that she did many similar things to her mum. She had an abortion early in 1965, after getting pregnant by Gene Pitney on a UK tour, then, in May, married her boyfriend of several years, Indica gallery owner John Dunbar, and had their son, Nicholas, in November. “It took me a long time to get away from that feeling I got from Mum, about men. Decades. But I don’t have it any more.”

She also got pregnant by Mick Jagger, for whom she left Dunbar in 1966, but lost the baby seven months into the pregnancy. Did that leave a lasting effect? “Yes, of course,” she says. “But please, it’s taken me years to separate myself from the Rolling Stones. I never talk about Mick any more, and I won’t talk about then.” There were two more marriages: to the Vibrators’ Ben Brierley in 1979, which lasted six years; and to writer Giorgio Della Terza in 1988, which lasted three. Then there was a 15-year relationship with French record producer Francois Ravard, who still manages her; they split in 2009, but remain good friends.

“My main priority in my head was always my work,” she continues, “but then, of course, the men came… and it wasn’t really what I wanted, but I was too pretty to be left alone.” She attempted suicide by drug overdose on a plane in 1969; she divorced and lost custody of her son a year later. By 1972, she was an anorexic heroin addict, living rough in London. “My answer to everything was to get as stoned as possible and live on the street, which made me sort of unattractive.” Making yourself unappealing liberated you? “Yeah!” Her smile broadens, as if this was the most wonderful revelation in the world.

Do read the whole thing. Faithfull was a remarkable artist and what used to be called a “vivid personality.”

If you heard of her in the United States, it was probably her 1964 recording of the Jagger-Richards song, ‘As Tears Go By:’

From The Guardian profile‘s notes on ‘As Tears Go By:’

Faithfull’s music is rarely discussed in any detail. Yes, she was originally signed because Rolling Stones manager Andrew Loog Oldham chanced upon her at a party, saying later he saw “an angel with big tits” with “a face that could sell”. No, she doesn’t have a voice to match that soft-focus face, and she never really did. Even the first song she sang, Mick Jagger and Keith Richards’s As Tears Go By, is stripped of any sentiment by her deadpan delivery. She was 17, sounding like Nico before Nico. (She sings it again on Negative Capability, forcefully, reclaiming it.)

(3) The Leda Strike Parallels

I’ve written before about the many striking parallels between Jonny Rokeby, Cormoran Strike’s supposed biological father, and Mick Jagger of the Rolling Stones. See ‘Rokeby, Jagger, and Heroin’ for the full review. After comparing the ‘Personal Life’ Wikipedia pages of Jagger and the one written about Rokeby in Cuckoo’s Calling, the list of life-correspondences is, well, striking. The fictional character and real-life analogue are both:

Today we learned that Rowling has been a big fan of Marianne Faithfull, whose life not only parallels the author’s own in interesting ways (the “comeback” from near destitution as a single mother?), but seems a template for Leda Strike. Her dependence on and forever being linked to Rokeby as Faithfull was to Jagger and the descent into ‘living rough’ or in squalid squats after their break-up, not to mention the heroin connection and the smoking, all call the Broken English vocalist and composer to mind. From the Wikipedia life of Faithfull:

She began a much-publicised relationship with Mick Jagger [in 1966] and left her husband to live with him. The couple became a notorious part of the hip Swinging London scene. She is heard on The Beatles’ song “Yellow Submarine”.She was found wearing only a fur rug by police executing a drug search at Redlands, Keith Richards’s house in West Wittering, Sussex. In an interview 27 years later with A.M. Homes for Details, Faithfull discussed her wilder days and admitted that the drug bust fur rug incident had ravaged her personal life: “It destroyed me. To be a male drug addict and to act like that is always enhancing and glamorising. A woman in that situation becomes a slut and a bad mother.” It was during this time that Faithfull lost three opportunities to appear in films. “I really thought I had blown my career.” In 1968, Faithfull, by now addicted to cocaine, gave birth to a stillborn daughter (whom she had named Corrina) while returning from Jagger’s country house in Ireland.

Faithfull’s involvement in Jagger’s life was reflected in some of the Rolling Stones’s best known songs. “Sympathy for the Devil”, featured on the 1968 album Beggars Banquet, partially was inspired by The Master and Margarita, written by Mikhail Bulgakov, a book that Faithfull introduced to Jagger. The song “You Can’t Always Get What You Want” on the 1969 album Let It Bleed was supposedly written and composed about Faithfull; the songs “Wild Horses” and “I Got the Blues” on the 1971 album Sticky Fingers were allegedly influenced by Faithfull, and she co-wrote “Sister Morphine” (the writing credit for the song was the subject of a protracted legal battle that was resolved with Faithfull listed as co-author). In her autobiography, Faithfull said Jagger and Richards released it in their own names so that her agent did not collect all the royalties and proceeds from the song, especially as she was homeless and addicted to heroin at the time. In 1968, Faithfull appeared in The Rolling Stones Rock and Roll Circus concert, giving a solo performance of “Something Better”.

In the Guardian profile:

Of the police drugs raid of Keith Richards’s home, Redlands, in 1967, at which Faithfull emerged naked in a fur rug, she wrote: “They emerged with their reputations amplified as dangerous, glamorous outlaws… I was destroyed by the very things that enhanced them”; and of her first song, Sister Morphine: “I wasn’t going to be allowed to break out of my image… I would not be permitted to leave that tawdry doll behind.”…

Before I leave, she gets up slowly, another cigarette in her hand, and gives me a little tour of the flat, pointing out a beautiful nude and some landscapes by Anita Pallenberg (“people forget what brilliant talent she had”). A snap of Faithfull and Mick Jagger in the studio hangs in the loo (“best place for it!”). Half of her double bed is covered with books as is the rest of the house: she points out one she’s reading about John Lennon, and one about Shelley – her next project, also with Warren Ellis, is based on Prometheus Unbound. “I can’t say anything else!” she smiles, wickedly.

I have been speculating that the revelations of Hallmarked Man’s meeting between Rokeby and Strike will include the rock star’s confession that he loved Leda profoundly, that she broke his heart with “all her fucking men,” and that she contributed to The Deadbeats’ song catalogue — as I learned today Marianne Faithfull did the Rolling Stones.

I’ve pretty much given up my days of predicting plot points in the next Rowling-Galbraith effort, but, wow, have I felt a wave of that old feeling this morning. Especially as Rowling re-posted the ‘For Marianne’ tweet from the Rolling Stones; tell me she wasn’t actually throwing a little shade their way for Jagger’s treatment of Marianne Faithfull.

Requiescat in Pace, Marianne Faithfull!

 

Louise Penny: Chief Inspector Gamache

During the ‘Learn to Read Like a Writer’ first semesters of my MFA studies at Oklahoma City University, my tutor, novelist Lou Berney, recommended I read Louise Penny‘s Bury Your Dead for an experience of properly intensive planning. I had never heard of Penny or her procedural mystery hero, Chief Inspector Gamache, and not even Berney’s clues that I was in for a shock prepared me for the incredulity I felt at the end of that book.

No, I won’t spoil the surprise for you — beyond saying Bury Your Dead is the seventh of Penny’s Gamache or ‘Three Pines’ murder mysteries and you’ll get much more out of #7 if you’ve read #6.

My son Zossima lives in Oklahoma City and stops by several times a week to do his laundry, cook with his mother, and borrow some books from my library (I know he actually gets most of his books from the OKC Metropolitan Library downtown but I’m glad he comes in to ask me if I have a copy of Kate Atkinson’s latest or whatever). He told me several weeks ago that he needed to read Agatha Christie; “What one book do you recommend?” I gave him The Murder of Roger Ackroyd.

He’s a novelist and a very serious reader who has been ‘reading like a writer reads’ almost as long as he has been reading. Still, I felt a little bit like Lou Berney may have felt in assigning Bury Your Dead as a book I had to review; I knew Zossima’s head was going to explode at the twist in the last pages of Roger Akroyd. I was also elated because at last I knew what to get him for the Feast of Theophany, our family’s gift-giving holiday. I ordered a copy of Pierre Bayard’s Who killed Roger Ackroyd? : the mystery behind the Agatha Christie mystery to give him when he returned the Christie title to my shelf.

Why?

Because as head-spinning as the end of Christie’s Ackroyd is, Bayard, a French psychoanalyst and literary critic, argues persuasively that the murderer who Poirot reveals at the end of that novel didn’t do it — and that Christie must have been disappointed that none of her readers understood what Poirot was up to in pinning the crime on the wrong person. [Bayard did this with Conan Doyle, too, in Sherlock Holmes Was Wrong: Reopening the Case of The Hound of the Baskervilles.]

I’ll leave it to you to figure out why that gift giving made me think of Louise Penny’s Bury Your Dead. I spent my monthly book allowance on a Theophany present for myself: a lot of the first twelve Chief Inspector Gamache procedurals I found on eBay and a special one volume edition of The Brutal Telling and Bury Your Dead. I’m guessing that Zossima will be interested in reading that once he finishes the Bayard.

I bring that up because (1) if, like me, you are not aware of Louise Penny, whose most recent Gamache, #19, is currently atop the fiction best seller list in Canada, you’re in for a treat, (2) I’ll be writing, I hope, about the twist I think we’re being set up for a la Bury Your Dead in Hallmarked Man, and (3) my initial foray into Penny’s books leads me to think they are largely about loss as the key element in human existence. “Loss” is a near constant in Rowling’s descriptions of what her latest book is about.

I finished Still Life yesterday and am well into A Fatal Grace today. More anon!

New Dan Brown Novel Due September 9 New Hunger Games Prequel on March 18

Two days after Western Christmas last year, Nick Jeffery revealed here that Amazon had posted the release date for The Hallmarked Man as September 9, 2025, for the hardcover, large print, Kindle, and Audible editions. There has been no confirmation, however, from Team Rowling or Mulholland Books that this is the date and we still do not have a cover. The Amazon date is a big deal because they are the goliath of book-sellers, but nothing is sure, I guess, until we have the book in hand.

So what?

It was announced today that Dan Brown’s new novel, The Secret of Secrets, will be published on September 9th this year and the global fandom of the Robert Langdon series was treated to that book’s cover. Read the People magazine story, ‘Dan Brown Announces New Book, The Secret of Secrets: ‘Most Ambitious Novel to Date,’ if you’re one of those fans. If you’re curious about that author’s ‘Lake and Shed’ equivalents, read the ‘secret of secrets’ behind Dan Brown’s success writing blockbuster novels at Godspy’s ‘My Lunch with an Old Friend of Dan Brown Proves Revealing About The DaVinci Code.’ Secret of Secrets is the sixth Robert Langdon novel, with The Da Vinci Code ranked #11 on the list of all-time best-selling novels and the first five books tied at #9 for best-selling series with more than 200 million copies sold.

Harry Potter is #1 on that list — but the Strike-Ellacott mysteries are not on the list at all and it stretches down to series that have only sold 15 million copies (in case you’re curious, there are 127 series listed). I suspect this may just be a function of the publisher or the author not wanting sales to be public knowledge, but, still, a novel from Dan Brown and Robert Galbraith on the same day? That’s either a bonanza for retail booksellers or a ginormous gaffe.

I do look forward to Hallmarked Man but I confess I’m more excited now about Suzanne Collins’ latest Hunger Games prequel, Sunrise on the Reaping. (Again, for the curious, the Hunger Games series’ four books have sold over 100 million copies and are #30 on the Wikipedia all-time list.) It will feature the Second Quarter Quell, the Games in which Haymitch features as the ‘winning’ District 12 tribute. I have argued since the run-up to Mockingjay’s publication in 2010 that Haymitch and the Donner sisters are the ‘Hidden Key’ to the original series, a story that couldn’t be told inside the Katniss Everdeen trilogy.

We’ll be talking about that theory from fifteen years ago in the weeks before the publication of Sunrise on the Reaping on March 18th, as well as the remarkable quotation from philosopher David Hume that Collins says was her inspiration for this story. It will be the perfect ‘Real or Not Real?’ warm-up for Rowling-Galbraith’s latest given her focus with Collins on the ‘real’ versus ‘what’s in my head.’

Rowling Tweets About Former ‘Friends:’ ‘It’s Not Paranoia to Think I Hate You’

I have read several reviews online of the history of Rowling’s conflict with Gender Theory ideologues, whom she refers to as “fundamentalists.” One common point they share is to offer the views of the Harry Potter film franchises’ actors and actresses who came out against the author’s views as a kind of counter-weight, as if those voices balanced out Rowling’s supposed “transphobia.” Rowling has not responded to the criticism of those thespians, but she has been absent from public events and filmed reunions in which they were featured players.

Last week, in an exchange with dancer Rosie Kay on Twixter, Rowling made it fairly clear that she despises those she feels betrayed her at a time when she was being piled on by all the usual suspects. It seems that there won’t be any reconciliation or cameos on the HBO+ adaptations of the Potter books.

To understand Rowling’s comments to Kay, it helps to know the dancer’s tweet, in which she struggled to “deal with feelings of betrayal.”

 

The “small business” she refers to, I think, is the Rosie Kay Dance Company, of which she was the founder, choreographer, and principal. It’s website no longer exists though its pages can be found on the Wayback Machine. It may have been “small,” but it was a rising cultural landmark. It disappeared when Kay was forced to resign from her positions at her company after complaints were made by some of her dancers to the board. They felt she needed to be canceled because of her “transphobic” opinions, in essence, that she thought men and women are different. You can read the long painful story of her resignation in the face of this usurping of place here, here, here, and here.

A July 2022 profile in The Times shared how much Rowling’s support meant to Kay at the time of her cancellation: [Read more…]