Rowling Calls Out Leftists Against ‘Fair Sports’ for Women: No Thanks to Trump

The Daily Wire covered the story: ‘J. K. Rowling Reacts to Trump’s No Men in Sports Executive Order

“Harry Potter” author J.K. Rowling, who has become an outspoken critic of trans-identifying men participating in women’s sports in recent years, posted a lengthy reaction on Thursday to President Donald Trump’s signing of an executive order banning the practice.

“Congratulations to every single person on the left who’s been campaigning to destroy women’s and girls’ rights. Without you, there’d be no images like this,” she said in a post to X that included an image of President Trump holding up the EO with his signature as he’s surrounded by young female athletes who witnessed the signing.

“This ‘why do you care about a tiny fraction of the population?’ line is, and always was, utterly ridiculous,” Rowling continued in a follow-up.

[Read more…]

Has Rowling’s Literary Career “Tanked”?

After great battles, in the fog of war and consequent chaos and confusion, there is inevitably a remnant group, oftentimes isolated individuals as in the Japanese zanryū nipponhei (‘holdout soldiers’) that refused to surrender after WWII, who don’t understand that they’ve lost or that the conflict is over. In the case of the ‘Trans War’ between Gender Critical thinkers and Gender Theorists, this is evident in the True Believers, the Trans Radical Activists or TRAs who believe that the Lost Cause of the Confederacy, 21st Century edition, goes on despite the now triumphant consensus that “transgenderism” is not a Civil Rights but a mental health care issue. It’s ‘early days,’ certainly, but sanity seems to have returned to the American polity, at least, with respect to sex, gender, and the guardrails for the protection of children and the rights of women.

One quick way to spot a lost Confederate soldier is to check social media comments about J. K. Rowling. The remnant holdouts in the jungles online are testifying there that they believe their efforts to destroy J. K. Rowling, to cancel her by making even mentioning her name radioactive among all thinking people, were successful. Case in point, Kendal Peters, whose Twixter stream might be confused for a parody site because of its consistent conformity with every conventional political position advanced by the Legacy media. Last week, she (?) shared her belief that toxic and “transphobic” Rowling’s “literary career” had been “destroyed completely and globally” by the Forces of Good:

Truth tellers rushed to the internet island Peters lives on in the ‘cloud’ to share with her, that, no, Rowling’s book sales were booming, not crashing, and she was thriving as a writer rather than someone who was “destroyed.” [Read more…]

Is ‘Back to the Future,’ 1-3, a Film Ring?

The ‘Lockard Theory’ discussed in the YouTube video above draws from Robert Lockard’s August 2014 article in The Deja Reviewer, ‘Great Scott! The Entire Back to the Future Trilogy Is One Big Chiasmus.’ Rudie Obias brought this to a larger reading public in September 2016’s Mental Floss piece,Back to the Future Fan Theory Suggests the Trilogy is an Elaborate Chiasmus.’

Mike Klimo, writing at roughly the same time as Lockard, gathered his online writing about the ring structure of the then six Star Wars movies on a website dedicated to the subject in time for Halloween in 2014. The consequent article, epic in title and scope, is ‘RING THEORY – The Hidden Artistry of the Star Wars
Prequels:
How George Lucas used an ancient technique called “ring composition” to reach a level of storytelling sophistication in his six-part saga that is unprecedented in cinema history‘ I wrote about it at HogwartsProfessor; see George Lucas’ Star Wars — a Ring Composition for that exegesis, and, incredibly, for his letter of thanks to me for my ring composition work on the Harry Potter series. Emily Strand discussed the structure of ‘A Force Awakens’ along these same lines.

I found the Back to the Future links above while trying to find a home in my gmail account for the writings about chiasmus by ‘Cormac Jones,’ whose brilliant ‘Cosmic Chiasmus’ I discussed here in 2022 and whose Substack page I found only last week (and to which I promptly subscribed). My search for a ‘Ring Composition’ home for posts from that site as they come into my inbox revealed that, yes, indeed, I did have a dedicated folder for that subject. Looking through the few emails in the file, I stumbled on a link from Louise Freeman about the Lockard theory. A belated thank you to her!

Profile of a Potter-Phile and Rowling Reader: Brian Basore of Oklahoma City

In 2016 I received an email from Brian Basore in which he shared his thoughts about Lewis Carroll, a remarkably complex man with an outsized set of contradictions in his life even for the Victorian era. Brian subsequently became a regular correspondent and a valued part of the HogwartsProfessor online community. I don’t know how many years it was before I learned that he lived in my adopted hometown, Oklahoma City, and before we met at a Christmas party in my home.

He recently retired from his job at the Oklahoma Historical Society, a job which he largely invented day to day along with what ‘Oklahoma History’ is (his 45 years there represent just under 40% of the state’s existence and close to 100% I think of what could be called its adulthood). Brian’s co-workers, his friends and admirers, had a small going away party in his honor on his last day.

It had a Harry Potter theme.

When he wrote to me about it, I thought this was an opportunity to challenge one of the persistent myths about Rowling Readers, namely, that they are all younger people, predominantly women, politically progressive, read mostly on their smart phones or iPads, and live on the American coasts. Kat Miller of MuggleNet recently opined to Variety that Harry Potter fandom was mostly women and “very, very queer.” That may seem to be more evidence of the bubble world in which she lives than reality, but my experience of fandom gatherings from 2003 to 2020 is that this is a fair description of that demographic.

But does that part of fandom which lives on Twixter and social media and which plans its vacations around Fan Con meet-ups in Orlando reflect the international diversity of Rowling’s audience? Or is it really just a reflection of the reality that readers of fiction are overwelmingly women?

Surveys consistently find that women read more books than men, especially fiction. Explanations abound, from the biological differences between the male and female brains, to the way that boys and girls are introduced to reading at a young age.

One thing is certain: Americans—of either gender—are reading fewer books today than in the past. A poll released last month by The Associated Press and Ipsos, a market-research firm, found that the typical American read only four books last year, and one in four adults read no books at all. This ‘Why Women Read More than Men‘ NPR story is from the year Deathly Hallows was published, but its assertions seem current: [Read more…]

Shift in Hallmarked Man’s Release Date?

As noted in my post last week on the release dates this year of Dan Brown’s Secret of Secrets and Suzanne Collins’ Sunrise on the Reaping (see ‘New Dan Brown Novel Due September 9 New Hunger Games Prequel on March 18), the date given on Amazon.com for Rowling-Galbraith’s Hallmarked Man publication was the same as the new Robert Langdon adventure. That seemed a head-scratcher or unforced gaffe akin to scheduling your movie to open the same weekend as a new Star Wars film or on Super Bowl Sunday.

@LudicrousMonica noted yesterday, though, that the Hallmarked Man‘s Amazon pages in the UK, in Germany, in France, and in Australia all now list the publication date as 2 September, a week earlier than the date on the Amazon.com page (US). The speculation on the comment thread there is that the move was made to sidestep a conflict with or get a jump on the Dan Brown blockbuster book release.

My best guess is that the American .com page will shift when we get the official announcement with a cover. Next week? I have no idea why Mulholland Books would change the date on Amazon pages around the world but not in the US.

Interesting aside: three days ago Hallmarked Man  was at #922 on Amazon.com’s bestseller list and #9 on their ‘Private Investigator Mysteries’ list and today is #718 on the first and #7 on the second, a 22% jump in less than half a week.

That’s good news for Mulholland, it being seven months until either of their publication dates. Still, Secret of Secrets is doing significantly better pre-publication: