Mailbag: Bad Dads and Peter Gillespie

I received a pretty involved question this morning from long time reader and correspondent Wayne Stauffer, one of the original ‘HogPro All-Pros.’ While attempting to answer it, I was compelled to reconsider one of the leading suspects in any line-up of likely Leda Strike murderers, namely, Peter Gillespie. I’ve been relatively dismissive of this fandom theory — see Who Killed Leda Strike? Peter Gillespie for my thoughts way back in 2021 — but Wayne’s question and the latest iteration of the S&E podcast crew theory has me thinking I was wrong not to argue Gillespie is the most likely character to have killed Cormoran’s mom, one readers should think of immediately as the killer.

Here is Wayne’s question, one that isn’t about Leda or Peter per se but Rowling’s ‘Daddy Issues’ and how it plays out in her fiction:

I’m wondering what the Hogwarts Professoriate thinks about an aspect of JKR’s works so far.

More than once the topic of her “strained” relationship with her father has been mentioned, yet in her writings so far we don’t see much of her vicariously working through any lingering “daddy issues” in her fiction (that is, characters with those issues).

We have Luna and Xeno Lovegood, Ginny and Arthur Weasley, and a bit of Hermione and Mr. Granger in the Harry Potter books, but those are all positive relationships.

I’m not as knowledgeable in her Strike novels, though I haven’t seen much discussed on your website. Robin seems to have other issues, but not those.

Casual Vacancy characters have a variety of dysfunctions, but Ickabog and Christmas Pig seem to be free of these.

Since 4th gen Rowling Studies is digging into biographical and psychological influences, I’m wondering how much this Daughter/Father dynamic plays in the writing. 

My answer to Wayne was to send him two long posts I’d written, neither of which addressed this subject the way he framed it, but both of which laid out Rowling’s fictional depictions of her relationship with ‘Peter John Rowling,’ her father, via characters named “Peter” or “Simon” and those named “John” or “James.” In the first post, ‘Christmas Pig 1: Jack Jones, Peter, and John,’ you get the Rowling family history and its reflection in the Bad Dads of her work; in the second, ‘Exceptions to the Peter-John Rule: John Bristow, Dolores Umbridge, Matt Cunliffe,’ I answered objections to the theory, namely (!), those characters named ‘John’ who were jerks (or much worse).

It wasn’t a direct answer to Wayne’s question, but it did share in a fairly cohesive way my thinking about “how much this Daughter/Father dynamic plays in the writing” of Rowling-Galbraith. I’m hoping that Prof Stauffer will consider writing up his notes on the actual Daddy-Daughter relationships in all Rowling’s work, a step beyond anything I have done.

He hinted at such an expository exercise in his answer to my response, in which he wrote, “So, Rowling has her characters embody the bad dad qualities more than she has them working through issues?” I think that’s about right, but I haven’t done the necessary survey of the work. My initial reservation would be ‘Jack Jones’ in Christmas Pig whose name is in essence ‘John squared’ and can be assumed to be the equivalent of ‘Joanne;’ the whole mythic Dante-esque alchemical transfiguration of this character in the Land of the Lost is his “working through” his Bad Dad “issues.” The money paragraph of the Christmas Pig post above:

Rowling dedicates the book to David and has explained that the story toys, the cuddly pig favorite and its replacement, reflect two such cuddly pigs that her son adored. Jack Jones, however, is a name, front and back, that is a form of the name John; he is Joanne Rowling more than David Murray, her name also derived from Johannes, the Greek word for John (Rowling has given her daughter Mackenzie the middle name Jean, the more obvious feminine form of John). To put all my allegorical and sublime symbolism cards on the table at the start, what Jack has lost in the story is his father, what Holly fears losing to her step-brother is her father, the Pig is the exteriorized ‘heart’ or love he has as token or “transitional object” of maternal, unconditional love, and the story of the Loser is the sublimated agony of separation from Dad experienced as a child-hero must in the world of things and language. The Christmas Pig, though, in addition to this psychological allegory or dream-journey is an anagogical tale of seeking communion with the Father in Heaven through the light in one’s heart, the Johannine theology of logos-love that permeates Rowling’s work.

[Read more…]

Swallows and Amazons: The Movie

I’m in the midst of a binge-read of Louise Penny novels and I confess to feeling more than a little tempted, after reading Nick Jeffery’s posts yesterday and the day before, to put aside aside Gamache 4, A Rule Against Murder, in order to read the twelve Arthur Ransome Swallows and Amazons titles.

I found he film trailer above and suspected that, as with the several chase scenes in the most recent adaptation of The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe, this movie was more a Blockbuster Retelling of a beloved story within Hollywood set parameters. And it seems to be, sort of.

But not really! I read a Daily Telegraph review of the film by Lewis Jones, ‘From MI6 to tea with Trotsky: the secret life of Swallows and Amazons author Arthur Ransome,’ in which I learned to my delight that the biggest change to the story-line was based on the author’s own remarkable life. Ransome, it turns out, had lived in Russia during its agonizing transition to the Soviet Union, 1914-1924, and worked simultaneously as a correspondent for English newspapers and propagandist for the Bolsheviks. He was recruited by M16 on his return to England but was always thought of as something of a Soviet sympathizer, if not quite a double-agent.

The movie-makers, in a film largely set on a lake, chose to incorporate these facts from Ransome’s ‘Lake’ as Rowling understands it, and re-worked them in their dark-room ‘Shed’ to raise the movie-version’s stakes significantly. Nick Jeffery’s points in ‘Biography Illuminating Text‘ seem to be at least as true about the movie as the books. [Read more…]

Biography Illuminating Text: From Rowling to Ransome and ‘Amazons’

Readers of yesterday’s blog will know that I’m currently making my way through the Swallows and Amazons series of books, alternating them with the Strike-Ellacott series. Readers here and listeners to the Rowling Studies podcast will know that I have long had a particular interest in the biography of J. K. Rowling. Little as we know about Rowling, what we do know add a lot of depth and richness to the story telling. Reading about Robin’s experiences working as a temp. holds a great deal more authority, knowing that Rowling also worked as a temp. in London.

I knew precisely nothing about Arthur Ransome prior to reading the first two books, but the vivid make believe world that the children make (particularly Roger and Titty) had me pretty convinced that these were reminiscences of the author’s childhood games, perhaps from a man who never grew up. It was a conversation with Beatrice Groves (who with John Granger has frequently steered me well for my next read) that there exists a house in the Lake District that the ‘real’ Roger used to live in.

Wonderfully, the children were based on an Anglo-Syrian family, that Ransome met in the Lake District, and later visited in Aleppo. The first book was dedicated to them, and the eldest sister later recalled that “Titty and Roger were very true to life”.

During his childhood, the Altounyans visited their British grandparents (his grandfather was W. G. Collingwood) in the Lake District where they met the writer Arthur Ransome. Ransome named some of the primary characters in his famous book, Swallows and Amazons, after Altounyan and three of his four sisters; Roger became Roger Walker the ship’s boy. Ransome later stayed with the family in Aleppo, bringing them a small dinghy to sail, and writing most of Peter Duck there.

Roger Altounyan – Wikipedia

If I had relied on the text, my image would have been off. Ransome was a very talented communicator and observer of children, not a man-child with a vivid recollection. A Captain Flint in the childhood games of others. Now when I read the stories I can imagine little Roger Altounyan, in England for the first time, with bossy, but fun-loving older sisters.

Swallows and Amazons for Harry Potter Fans

Its about time for my Audible re-listen to the Robert Galbraith Strike-Ellacott series, and I needed to find something new to listen to in between each volume. Much like Jane Austen’s Emma, I am an inveterate list maker and months (…years) before I am due to finally get round a new book, I have planned my programme. I like to alternate re-reads (or re-listens) with new books and also alternate heavy, or concentrated reads, with something lighter. This time around my palate cleanser for the first four Cormoran Strike books, were the first four volumes of Arthur Ransome’s Swallows and Amazons.

Although I can find no evidence that J. K. Rowling has read them, so many people in the UK have, that they have become something of a shared cultural touchstone in the manner of Harry Potter. Before reading the first book, I knew that the stories were about four children in the small sailing boat Swallow, and two others in the sailing boat Amazon, who start off as enemies and later as allies, having adventures in the Lake District and Norfolk Broads. If pressed, I would have guessed that the crew of the Amazon were a pair of tomboy girls, and that the stories were set in the 1930’s. It says something for their cultural pervasiveness that all of these assumptions turned out to be correct.

Arthur Ransome was, from 1930 to the early 1960s, what J.K. Rowling is today: author of a series of children’s books which shaped the imagination of a generation. Rooted in the heyday of the British Empire, Swallows and Amazons and its sequels described a nostalgic Utopia.

The Last Englishman: The Double Life of Arthur Ransome
by Roland Chambers

This is a series where children are granted the freedom to explore, adventure, and learn through their own resourcefulness. The story revolves around the Walker children: John, Susan, Titty, and Roger, who are the children of an off stage destroyer captain in the Royal Navy. Known as the Swallows, after their boat, they are on holiday in the Lake District. They set up camp on an island they name Wild Cat Island, where they encounter another set of children, the Blackett sisters: Nancy and Peggy, who call themselves the Amazons, after their own vessel. The narrative follows their adventures involving sailing, camping, and a playful rivalry that turns into a shared quest involving a mysterious uncle and a hidden treasure. Much like Harry Potter, this is a world within a world, where the fantastical exists alongside the mundane. Here the fantasy exist explicitly inside the imagination of the children, at least in the first two books. Tins of corned beef becomes pemmican, a food used by explorers, and the most visible local hill becomes the peak of Darien. The epigraph to Swallows and Amazons chapter 1, is from On First Looking into Chapman’s Homer by John Keats, the most famous sonnet in English other than those by Shakespeare.

Much have I travell’d in the realms of gold,
And many goodly states and kingdoms seen;
Round many western islands have I been
Which bards in fealty to Apollo hold.
Oft of one wide expanse had I been told
That deep-brow’d Homer ruled as his demesne;
Yet did I never breathe its pure serene
Till I heard Chapman speak out loud and bold:
Then felt I like some watcher of the skies
When a new planet swims into his ken;
Or like stout Cortez when with eagle eyes
He star’d at the Pacific—and all his men
Look’d at each other with a wild surmise—
Silent, upon a peak in Darien.
The books are very much of their time, and their middle class homes contain cooks and nurses as a matter of course. Adults are transformed into ‘natives’ by the ‘explorers’ of a benevolent colonial empire, and there are a few uses of outdated language that would be taken as insensitive to a modern reader. The freedom afforded to the children here would be considered reckless abandonment by today’s parenting standards, but this is all to their charm for an adult reader, and thrilling excitement to a child.
I wish I had been introduced to these as a child. Not least because the excellent introduction to sailing principles would have been a boon to thirteen-year-old Nick, just starting out on the Hornblower novels.

The Rowling Library Magazine #98: Coke, Kiddie Potter, Bio-Pic, and Strike8!

Our friends at The Rowling Library have outdone themselves again! This month’s e-zine includes the cover story on Bloomsbury’s ‘Young Reader’ introductions to Harry Potter, an update on the release date of Strike8, Hallmarked Man, an exploration of fear in the Hogwarts Saga, a fun look back at Coca-Cola’s team-up with Warner Brothers in Potter marketingand a speculative look at what a Rowling bio-pic might look like in the wake of the new Bob Dylan movie, A Complete Unknown.

Read it here, download here, and join TRL’s international group of sponsors here!