Mailbag: Help with Christian Harry Hater

This plea for assistance or advice was in my inbox this morning:

Dear Mr. Granger,

I am asking for some advice on how to handle fellow Christians who are disrespectful towards people who enjoy Harry Potter.

I recently conversed back and forth on Instagram with a very condescending Christian who labeled me as “dense” for disagreeing with his arguments and muggle-like attitude–lol. 

I am curious how you would respond to the following claims he made:

  • Harry Potter contains pagan practices;
  • Real occult references and symbolism are in the books;
  • Harry Potter contains information about “magick”, sigils, and spells (that sounds like some Richard Abanes propaganda);
  • The Deathly Hallows symbol is designed from Solomonic sigil magick;
  • Incantations are bad (not fantasy) and are called “magick” (he conveniently ignores the fact that incantations and spells are present in both The Lord of the Rings and The Chronicles of Narnia and yet defends both of those book series);
  • Harry Potter promotes the heresy of gnosticism;
  • Harry Potter story elements are based on real occultic legends/people, i.e.; Alastor Moody based on Aleister Crowley, Cassandra Vablatsky based on Helena Blavatsky, the Philosopher’s Stone, and the Hand of Glory;
  • J.K. Rowling’s tattoo is demonic (I thought your argument posted on Hogwarts Professor sufficiently debunked this already); and
  • J.K. Rowling has not outrightly pronounced her faith (we already know that is false).

I tried recommending your book How Harry Cast His Spell to him and asked if he would give it a chance–but he’s so stubborn and pious that he can’t be open to another viewpoint. He claims to have been studying gnosticism and magick for ten years and says that all of these things while not directly involving invocational magic are how the Devil promotes sinful storytelling and rebellion against God.

As a conservative Christian and a Potterhead, how would you counter these bold arguments?

Thank you for all the work you’re doing and God Bless 🙂

Josh

Where to begin, Josh? I am an Orthodox Christian and a Perennialist-inclined literary critic rather than “conservative” or a “Potterhead” but I see your point that I don’t see the Hogwarts Saga as does this heresy hunter and Harry Hater.

Every one of these claims made by your Instagram sparring partner, as you noted, was made by Richard Abanes in his Harry Potter and the Bible : The Menace Behind the Magick(2001). That doesn’t mean that the claim is ipso facto in error; it actually means that there is evidence that the claim is true but the argument is wrong-headed. As you point out more than once that he was not receptive to discussion or “open to another viewpoint,” I don’t think you should spend any more time than you already have trying to persuade him.

I’d ask you to think about three things to prevent you from slipping into the pious surety of this internet maven you tangled with online.

First, my books on the Christian content and structure of the Harry Potter books and series were not written as ammunition to deploy against those who have decided not to read the book or those who campaign against their supposed “corruption of the youth.” My goal when talking about Rowling’s traditional artistry has been primarily to explain to readers who love the Wizarding World adventures why they love them.

Life is short and there is no end of books to read; there is no point in wrestling verbally with those who choose either not to engage with Harry Potter and friends or to make decrying Rowling’s fantasy fiction an article and touchstone of their faith. The exercise is not edifying to the For or the Against debaters and as often as not makes the Defender of Dumbledore begin to sound and act like his or her dismissive opponent.

Second, as rich as the books are in Christian content, symbolism, even narrative structure (and I hope to be revisiting this subject soon in light of remarkable insights from a professor in Illinois Who Must Not Be Named), there are elements in the books that most Christians would consider immoral, e.g., the torture of Slytherin bullies on the Hogwarts Express at the end of Goblet of Fire. Rowling herself has recently said she has changed her mind about the morality of assisted suicide, which makes Dumbledore’s sacrificial death at a friend’s hand lamentable. These books, uplifting and challenging and meaningful as they are, are not a postmodern Pilgrim’s Progress.

And, third, the work I have been doing consequent to Rowling’s ‘Lake and Shed’ 2019 interview suggests that the Harry Potter series can be read as the author’s prolonged feminist argument in Christian symbols for pre-natal infanticide (‘induced abortion’). See this conversation I had with Nick Jeffery for why that reading is credible and this discussion of alternative explanations for the ‘Lost Child’ Golden Thread in Rowling’s work.

We’re a long way, Josh, from the black-and-white reading of Harry Potter in which those with misgivings about the books are necessarily ignorant boobs and those who love them are by definition on the side of the angels. That’s especially true when you factor in the fandom leaders who now think of Rowling as the transphobic anti-Christ when they used to idolize her every thought and tweet and the one time Harry Haters who are now Team Rowling because of her stand against the surgical mutilation and chemical castration of children and adolescents.

The books haven’t changed but their Serious Readers have, for and against, and our appreciation of the Hogwarts Saga has been deepened and challenged simultaneously by all we have learned about the author since 2007 and about her children’s books consequent to her many post Potter publications.

To conclude, then, I’d leave you first with Twain’s advice not to wrestle with a pig (“you get filthy dirty and the pig likes it”) and then with my encouragement to read the Harry Potter novels with an open mind yourself. No, Richard Abanes’ ‘arguments by association’ remain logically invalid, but there’s a world of unanswered questions about this wonderful seven book series still to explore, most notably, “What unresolved trauma in Rowling’s life inspired her to write them?”

Thank you for writing and best wishes in your serious reading!

John

Mailbag: What Are Serious Readers to Do With the Harry Potter Theme Parks? Sacred Art, Neo-Iconoclasm, and More

I received this email from Justin Clavet last month and he has given me permission to post it with my response. It touches on one of the keystones of our conversations here at HogwartsProfessor, namely, the relative value of various media experiences of the same story.

Justin agrees to some extent with my thesis that screened adaptations of story are not only not imaginative experiences of the work per se but destructive of the reading experience had before or after it. His question is about the theme park experience of a work, specifically the Universal Studios Harry Potter theme parks.

It’s a wonderful question and it comes from a serious reader whose favorite Rowling work is Casual Vacancy, the second member of that very exclusive club I have now met. We’ll start with his letter and then after the jump I’ll offer my first thoughts about his question in hope of beginning a conversation about how to understand the immersive experience of a theme park based on a written work.

Hi John,

I am probably one of the few who came to the books by way of the Universal theme park experiences. I ignored the books as a child – in spite of my friends’ recommendations – because everyone was reading them and I didn’t want to be part of the crowd. (Kids make some stupid choices.) But when I was living and going to college in Orlando in my 20s, I had an annual pass for the Walt Disney World and Universal Orlando theme parks (for a Florida resident at the time, this was cheaper entertainment than a monthly cable bill, if you can believe it).

I was enchanted by the Diagon Alley and Hogsmeade themed lands there, having only seen films 1-5, and never having read a single page of the books. I ordered myself a complete box set of the Bloomsbury editions and got started. I switched back and forth between reading the text and listening to Jim Dale’s excellent audiobook narrations. I fell in love and my life was changed.

(I managed, ca. 2018, to read about the death of Dumbledore in the Half-Blood Prince and the triumph of Harry over death and Voldemort in the Deathly Hallows unspoilt. I don’t know how many people of my generation could say that about their first reading of the books in their mid-20s. That was a real blessing.)

After finishing the Harry Potter series, I dove right in to The Casual Vacancy and the Strike-Ellacott stories. Somewhere in between, I found this great site of yours.

All that as background to say…This is one piece here to which I keep coming back. I agree with you entirely about film “adaptations” and their corrosive effects on the stories we read in books. It diminishes our imagination (making forceful intrusions, like seeing Maggie Smith’s face and hearing Maggie Smith’s voice when reading about Prof. McGonagall) and corrupts our memories (like thinking that Harry saw Peter Pettigrew on the Marauder’s Map). Also, so much of the symbolism and meaning is lost by the omissions and abbreviations necessitated by the medium’s runtime limitations. In short, it’s a cheapened experience that can injure our reading enjoyment. I’d love to read more about your thoughts on the “neo-iconoclasm of film.”

I’ve come to the decision that I will no longer watch motion picture “adaptations” of the stories I love. The Casual Vacancy is my favorite of Rowling’s works, and I think that TV series is a particularly bad adaptation, even being produced by her own company. I have seen some of the early episodes of the CB Strike TV series but have no intention of ever continuing because I have fantastically vivid images of Robin and Strike in my head and I don’t want to start seeing Holliday Grainger and Tom Burke there instead.

I still enjoy the medium of theme parks, though. Done well, they can be a most inviting and excellent collaboration of the arts of architecture, landscaping, gardening, interior design, cuisine, musical composition, and storytelling – altogether, placemaking, if you will. Unfortunately, they are also likely the most commercialized setting of these arts.

[Read more…]

Mailbag: Bad Dads and Peter Gillespie

I received a pretty involved question this morning from long time reader and correspondent Wayne Stauffer, one of the original ‘HogPro All-Pros.’ While attempting to answer it, I was compelled to reconsider one of the leading suspects in any line-up of likely Leda Strike murderers, namely, Peter Gillespie. I’ve been relatively dismissive of this fandom theory — see Who Killed Leda Strike? Peter Gillespie for my thoughts way back in 2021 — but Wayne’s question and the latest iteration of the S&E podcast crew theory has me thinking I was wrong not to argue Gillespie is the most likely character to have killed Cormoran’s mom, one readers should think of immediately as the killer.

Here is Wayne’s question, one that isn’t about Leda or Peter per se but Rowling’s ‘Daddy Issues’ and how it plays out in her fiction:

I’m wondering what the Hogwarts Professoriate thinks about an aspect of JKR’s works so far.

More than once the topic of her “strained” relationship with her father has been mentioned, yet in her writings so far we don’t see much of her vicariously working through any lingering “daddy issues” in her fiction (that is, characters with those issues).

We have Luna and Xeno Lovegood, Ginny and Arthur Weasley, and a bit of Hermione and Mr. Granger in the Harry Potter books, but those are all positive relationships.

I’m not as knowledgeable in her Strike novels, though I haven’t seen much discussed on your website. Robin seems to have other issues, but not those.

Casual Vacancy characters have a variety of dysfunctions, but Ickabog and Christmas Pig seem to be free of these.

Since 4th gen Rowling Studies is digging into biographical and psychological influences, I’m wondering how much this Daughter/Father dynamic plays in the writing. 

My answer to Wayne was to send him two long posts I’d written, neither of which addressed this subject the way he framed it, but both of which laid out Rowling’s fictional depictions of her relationship with ‘Peter John Rowling,’ her father, via characters named “Peter” or “Simon” and those named “John” or “James.” In the first post, ‘Christmas Pig 1: Jack Jones, Peter, and John,’ you get the Rowling family history and its reflection in the Bad Dads of her work; in the second, ‘Exceptions to the Peter-John Rule: John Bristow, Dolores Umbridge, Matt Cunliffe,’ I answered objections to the theory, namely (!), those characters named ‘John’ who were jerks (or much worse).

It wasn’t a direct answer to Wayne’s question, but it did share in a fairly cohesive way my thinking about “how much this Daughter/Father dynamic plays in the writing” of Rowling-Galbraith. I’m hoping that Prof Stauffer will consider writing up his notes on the actual Daddy-Daughter relationships in all Rowling’s work, a step beyond anything I have done.

He hinted at such an expository exercise in his answer to my response, in which he wrote, “So, Rowling has her characters embody the bad dad qualities more than she has them working through issues?” I think that’s about right, but I haven’t done the necessary survey of the work. My initial reservation would be ‘Jack Jones’ in Christmas Pig whose name is in essence ‘John squared’ and can be assumed to be the equivalent of ‘Joanne;’ the whole mythic Dante-esque alchemical transfiguration of this character in the Land of the Lost is his “working through” his Bad Dad “issues.” The money paragraph of the Christmas Pig post above:

Rowling dedicates the book to David and has explained that the story toys, the cuddly pig favorite and its replacement, reflect two such cuddly pigs that her son adored. Jack Jones, however, is a name, front and back, that is a form of the name John; he is Joanne Rowling more than David Murray, her name also derived from Johannes, the Greek word for John (Rowling has given her daughter Mackenzie the middle name Jean, the more obvious feminine form of John). To put all my allegorical and sublime symbolism cards on the table at the start, what Jack has lost in the story is his father, what Holly fears losing to her step-brother is her father, the Pig is the exteriorized ‘heart’ or love he has as token or “transitional object” of maternal, unconditional love, and the story of the Loser is the sublimated agony of separation from Dad experienced as a child-hero must in the world of things and language. The Christmas Pig, though, in addition to this psychological allegory or dream-journey is an anagogical tale of seeking communion with the Father in Heaven through the light in one’s heart, the Johannine theology of logos-love that permeates Rowling’s work.

[Read more…]

Mailbag: Is Rowling Guilty of ‘Gender Appropriation’? Why ‘Robert Galbraith’?

Hi John,

A question that has been with me for a while is this: in light of Rowling’s position on transgender issues, what do we make of her use of a male-sounding pseudonym (JK Rowling) and an obviously male pseudonym (Robert Galbraith, with uber-masculine military backstory and all)? I mean, couldn’t this be considered gender appropriation? identifying as male?

Women writers have used male pseudonyms for a while to juice sales to male readers. Mary Ann Evans (George Eliot) and Emily Bronte (Ellis Bell) are just two examples.

For one as stridently feminist as Rowling, why the male persona? Of course, in 1990s her initial editor likely advised her to use the initials to attract boy readers, thereby increasing sales, and she, as a writer new to the publishing industry, naively took the advice. But 15+ years later, the wildly successful author/millionaire commander of her empire, with 7+ books, multiple films, one or two theme parks, and philanthropic organizations behind her, was surely much more confident in her abilities, ideas, and beliefs, yet still chose a male persona to check on her popularity aside from the JKR reputation.

Anyway, I’m sure she’s a complex person, so the answer won’t be simple.

Am I just being a smart aleck or is there something to this?

I think it’s a great question; thank you for asking!

I want to take this in three different directions, any one of which three ideas could be the subject of its own post. The first is to dismiss pre-emptively the rot Rowling offers about her name choices as well as the suggestion that the words ‘gender appropriation’ inspire today, the second is the alchemical resolution of contraries into an hermaphroditic ‘Rebis,’ and the third is the Shakespearean psychomachia and mythic backdrop of the Strike-Ellacott series. Join me after the jump for my introductions to reasons why Rowling-Galbraith-Murray has chosen the pseudonyms that she has. [Read more…]

Mailbag: Alchemy of Hallmarked Man?

I received a comment on my post ‘Rowling Q&A in The Sunday Times’ that included an off-topic question. I have elected to answer it here rather than on that thread. It’s a subject in which I think a lot of HogwartsProfessor readers are interested, for one thing, and none of them would be going to a post on the Times Q&A to learn more about it.

Hi. I agree. Her recent interview [with The Times] was meant to sell newspapers rather than give real information. Whatever you’ve got to say about The Supper At Emmaus, I’d like to hear it. It’s an interesting Christian painting.

Besides that, I’ve got a question about Strike #8, The Hallmarked Man. All the clues she’s given us are about metals.  Metals say “Nigredo” to me, but the predominance of silver says #8 might be the  “Albedo” book? If so, was The Running Grave the “Nigredo” book?  Thanks for reading. Looking forward to your answer.

There are actually three questions in those two paragraphs. Here are my answers for this Serious Striker:

(1) “What do you think of Caravaggio’s Supper at Emmaus?”

If you are a HogwartsProfessor subscriber over at Substack, you’ve already received my long-form essay on this subject. I hope you’ll read it and let me know what you think.

(2) “Was Running Grave the ‘Nigredo’ novel in the Cormoran Strike series?”

Great question! We will not know until we have all ten books in the Strike Saga but it certainly was a break-down piece for both Robin and Cormoran.

If I had to wager on the subject (and, being broke, the betting would have to be for amusement rather than remuneration), I’d go with Evan Willis’ idea on the Tetrachtys structure of the ten book set, which, if memory serves, has a three book nigredo ‘triad,’ a two book albedo and one book rubedo ‘monad,’ that last in parallel with Christmas Pig. See ‘Why the Cormoran Strike Novels are a Ten Book Series‘ for the math and the alchemy.

Of course, Rowling-Galbraith might be doing in the ten book series what Bronte Studios is said to be doing in the ten year adaptation of the Hogwarts Saga, i.e., one year for each of the first four and two for each of the last three. Alchemically, that would give us two books for each of the ‘back-side’ reverse alchemy turtle-shell lines. See William Sprague and Louise Freeman for the ‘reverse alchemy’ idea in Potter and Strike.

(3) “Will The Hallmarked Man be the ‘Albedo’ novel in the Cormoran Strike series?”

No idea! I can point you to a Serious Striker, though, who has given this a lot of thought (and written cogently about it, too). Which is to say, “Someone in addition to Evan Willis and the piece linked to in the answer to the second question.”

That would be Beatrice Groves, Research Fellow and tutor at Trinity College, Oxford, and author of  Literary Allusion in Harry Potter, who in her post at the HogwartsProfessor Substack about Rowling’s latest twixter picture ‘The Golden Journey to The Hallmarked Man‘ provides links to other articles she has written that explore the alchemy possibilities in Strike8. Here is the paragraph with those links to save you the search:

The second thing that struck me was, of course, the alchemical possibilities of the title of Flecker’s poem – some gold to add to all that silver! I’ve written about the possible influence of alchemy and precious metals on Strike 8 before and had predicted the keyword ‘silver’ in the title of all the epigraph texts of The Hallmarked Man – maybe instead they will all have a precious metal in the title? The ‘sound of silver bells’ in the wider poem was also a line that stood out given that we know Silver Bells, by Dean Martin is going to play some kind of role. Most striking in this regard is the ‘glimmering sea’ of Rowling’s header quotation, as it is so close the silver sea of the previous epigraph text we have been given. That sea turned silver by the sun glinting from it: ‘“A silver sea! A silver sea!” he cried aloud, and into his mind there flashed an incongruous comparison of the bountifulness of Nature’s silver with the pitiful grains they hacked out of her rocks with such toil and hardship’ (A Maid of the Silver Sea).

To answer your question, “Evan Willis and Beatrice Groves think that Hallmarked Man will be an albedo novel.” They come at the subject from remarkably different angles and they seem to have arrived at the same conclusion.

If you’re wondering why I’m not entering this fray, the answer I think is in this ‘Rowling Studies’ podcast that Nick Jeffery and I posted, you guessed it, over at the HogwartsProfessor Substack site. Check out Memorial Day’sOn Reading, “On Writing:” A Four Generational Approach to J. K. Rowling’s New Q&A.’ In that conversation, Nick and I discuss the rut that Rowling Studies is in, one, incidentally, that I helped dig and sustain over more than two decades.

The rut, in brief, is interpreting Rowling novels as they come out, exegesis largely independent of her work as a whole and devoid of discussion of its inspiration in psychological ‘Lake,’ labor that continues until Team Rowling begins to drop cookie crumb clues — Twixter contests, cameos, and scene shots! — about the nest book, at which time all energy shifts to predictions about that novel (scorecards about bullseyes and misses to be scored post publication).

Forgive me, but, having done that book sales-fandom excitement pro bono work for Rowling, Inc., for as long as I have, I think it’s time to re-think what we’re doing, kick back on the guess-work, and do the “slow mining” reflection that Ruskin recommended in Queen of the Air to get a better appreciation of Rowling’s artistry and meaning. I helped pioneer the ‘Let’s Guess!’ speculative game during the inter librum years of Potter Mania to help introduce readers waiting on the next book to ideas like literary alchemy and psychomachia.

That’s just not necessary anymore, I think. What we need now is a critical biography approach as well as an oeuvre wide perspective, frankly, a less frenetic and breathless enthusiasm for an anticipated or just published work and more Larger View take on what The Presence is writing. That’s still lot’s of fun, trust me, and has all the advantages of being new ground.

So, count me out on this year’s guesswork about Hallmarked Man. I think the Checklist I wrote before Ink Black Heart is still a good guide if you want to go there. I’m simultaneously in rut-recovery and excited about exploring a new methodology.

Love to Father Nicholas and Kansas friends from Oklahoma!