Mailbag: Help with Christian Harry Hater

This plea for assistance or advice was in my inbox this morning:

Dear Mr. Granger,

I am asking for some advice on how to handle fellow Christians who are disrespectful towards people who enjoy Harry Potter.

I recently conversed back and forth on Instagram with a very condescending Christian who labeled me as “dense” for disagreeing with his arguments and muggle-like attitude–lol. 

I am curious how you would respond to the following claims he made:

  • Harry Potter contains pagan practices;
  • Real occult references and symbolism are in the books;
  • Harry Potter contains information about “magick”, sigils, and spells (that sounds like some Richard Abanes propaganda);
  • The Deathly Hallows symbol is designed from Solomonic sigil magick;
  • Incantations are bad (not fantasy) and are called “magick” (he conveniently ignores the fact that incantations and spells are present in both The Lord of the Rings and The Chronicles of Narnia and yet defends both of those book series);
  • Harry Potter promotes the heresy of gnosticism;
  • Harry Potter story elements are based on real occultic legends/people, i.e.; Alastor Moody based on Aleister Crowley, Cassandra Vablatsky based on Helena Blavatsky, the Philosopher’s Stone, and the Hand of Glory;
  • J.K. Rowling’s tattoo is demonic (I thought your argument posted on Hogwarts Professor sufficiently debunked this already); and
  • J.K. Rowling has not outrightly pronounced her faith (we already know that is false).

I tried recommending your book How Harry Cast His Spell to him and asked if he would give it a chance–but he’s so stubborn and pious that he can’t be open to another viewpoint. He claims to have been studying gnosticism and magick for ten years and says that all of these things while not directly involving invocational magic are how the Devil promotes sinful storytelling and rebellion against God.

As a conservative Christian and a Potterhead, how would you counter these bold arguments?

Thank you for all the work you’re doing and God Bless 🙂

Josh

Where to begin, Josh? I am an Orthodox Christian and a Perennialist-inclined literary critic rather than “conservative” or a “Potterhead” but I see your point that I don’t see the Hogwarts Saga as does this heresy hunter and Harry Hater.

Every one of these claims made by your Instagram sparring partner, as you noted, was made by Richard Abanes in his Harry Potter and the Bible : The Menace Behind the Magick(2001). That doesn’t mean that the claim is ipso facto in error; it actually means that there is evidence that the claim is true but the argument is wrong-headed. As you point out more than once that he was not receptive to discussion or “open to another viewpoint,” I don’t think you should spend any more time than you already have trying to persuade him.

I’d ask you to think about three things to prevent you from slipping into the pious surety of this internet maven you tangled with online.

First, my books on the Christian content and structure of the Harry Potter books and series were not written as ammunition to deploy against those who have decided not to read the book or those who campaign against their supposed “corruption of the youth.” My goal when talking about Rowling’s traditional artistry has been primarily to explain to readers who love the Wizarding World adventures why they love them.

Life is short and there is no end of books to read; there is no point in wrestling verbally with those who choose either not to engage with Harry Potter and friends or to make decrying Rowling’s fantasy fiction an article and touchstone of their faith. The exercise is not edifying to the For or the Against debaters and as often as not makes the Defender of Dumbledore begin to sound and act like his or her dismissive opponent.

Second, as rich as the books are in Christian content, symbolism, even narrative structure (and I hope to be revisiting this subject soon in light of remarkable insights from a professor in Illinois Who Must Not Be Named), there are elements in the books that most Christians would consider immoral, e.g., the torture of Slytherin bullies on the Hogwarts Express at the end of Goblet of Fire. Rowling herself has recently said she has changed her mind about the morality of assisted suicide, which makes Dumbledore’s sacrificial death at a friend’s hand lamentable. These books, uplifting and challenging and meaningful as they are, are not a postmodern Pilgrim’s Progress.

And, third, the work I have been doing consequent to Rowling’s ‘Lake and Shed’ 2019 interview suggests that the Harry Potter series can be read as the author’s prolonged feminist argument in Christian symbols for pre-natal infanticide (‘induced abortion’). See this conversation I had with Nick Jeffery for why that reading is credible and this discussion of alternative explanations for the ‘Lost Child’ Golden Thread in Rowling’s work.

We’re a long way, Josh, from the black-and-white reading of Harry Potter in which those with misgivings about the books are necessarily ignorant boobs and those who love them are by definition on the side of the angels. That’s especially true when you factor in the fandom leaders who now think of Rowling as the transphobic anti-Christ when they used to idolize her every thought and tweet and the one time Harry Haters who are now Team Rowling because of her stand against the surgical mutilation and chemical castration of children and adolescents.

The books haven’t changed but their Serious Readers have, for and against, and our appreciation of the Hogwarts Saga has been deepened and challenged simultaneously by all we have learned about the author since 2007 and about her children’s books consequent to her many post Potter publications.

To conclude, then, I’d leave you first with Twain’s advice not to wrestle with a pig (“you get filthy dirty and the pig likes it”) and then with my encouragement to read the Harry Potter novels with an open mind yourself. No, Richard Abanes’ ‘arguments by association’ remain logically invalid, but there’s a world of unanswered questions about this wonderful seven book series still to explore, most notably, “What unresolved trauma in Rowling’s life inspired her to write them?”

Thank you for writing and best wishes in your serious reading!

John

Reading Rowling the Hard, Right Way versus Enjoying the Surface Story

Last week on the Feast of the Transfiguration and a friend’s 25th wedding anniversary, I wrote a Substack post with the title above and the subtitle, ‘Images of the Transfiguration, Story as Non Liturgical Sacred Art, What We Do at Hogwarts Professor, and How We’ll Be Reading Hallmarked Man.’ In it, I shared my experience in 1981 at the University of Chicago ‘Smart Gallery’s exhibit of Raphael’s ‘Transfiguration of Christ’ and consequent conversion to a more traditional and less superficial understanding of art and story.

The post was taken in large part from my PhD thesis notes about story as a ‘non-liturgical sacred art’ and the difference between sacred art of all kinds and profane art with religious content. Believe it or not, it’s relevant not only with respect to how we read and appreciate the work of J. K. Rowling — to include of course the soon to be published Hallmarked Man— but also how we understand what it means to be human and how we properly align our lives and entertainments.

I understand that it’s hard sledding at points and not for those who are completely at home with conventional thinking (or who are predisposed to dismiss the idea that there are good, better, and best ways to do anything, to include reading, because that is somehow “exclusive”); I hope you will give it an honest reading when you have a minute and an open mind. ‘Reading Rowling the Hard, Right Way.’

Today is the Feast of the Dormition of the Mother of God, what Roman Catholic believers call the ‘Assumption.’ For an art historian and Catholic perspective on the sacred vs profane art distinction, I recommend Hilary White’s explanation of the difference between Catholic and Orthodox depictions of the Dormition of the Mother of God and especially White’s ‘Lies the Renaissance Told You,’ for her overview of when and how, in her terminology, sacred art became secular. It is an excellent overview of the gulf separating art that imitates nature, “illusionism,” versus the Creator’s “method of operation” aka Medieval “realism.”

If you want a short cut to one point of relevance to these ideas and how to read J. K. Rowling, just note that the ring around Christ in the Transfiguration and the Dormition icons, the so-called mandorla or almond, is traditionally the same shape as the Ichthys fish, the intersection of two circles, albeit on its side. The symbolism of this intersection of heaven and earth, the God-Man, plays an important part in understanding Rowling’s favorite painting, Caravaggio’s Supper at Emmaus, and Rowling’s use of it as the mother-of-pearl fish pendant in Running Grave.

Nick Jeffery and I discuss many of these ideas in our most recent conversation, also at the HogwartsProfessor Substack site, ‘Is Rowling a Romance Writer or What?‘ Rowling’s book review of Nikola Sturgeon’s memoir and the New York Times article, ‘The Wizard’s Everlasting Spell,’ about the vitality of Harry Potter fan fiction also provide a lot of food for thought germane to our plans for reading Hallmarked Man, believe it or not. Have a look or listen.

Today, though, is the Feast of the Dormition, which in addition to being one of the great Feasts of the traditional Christian Church that merits a two week fast in preparation, is my wife’s Name Day and my youngest son’s birthday. She shared with me after reading my post about Raphael’s heroic ‘Transfiguration’ her parallel experiences as an American going to high school in Italy on first seeing Titian’s ‘Assumption of the Virgin‘ while on a tour of Venice.

Please do read Hilary White’s essays (here and here) for an accessible explanation of why Titian and Raphael’s work, though beautiful, are profane art with a secular subject rather than sacred art per se. She is especially helpful, too, if you’ve ever wondered about those signature-for-the-period baby-with-wings representation of angels.

My wife’s experience of this painting as a jaded teen in the 70s with a crowd of her peers? Profane as it may be, as Raphael’s ‘Transfiguration’ had done to me, so Titian’s ‘Assumption,’ even larger than Raphael’s last painting, shocked her into reflection about her de facto atheism and vibrant skepticism about all things holy or ‘churchy.’ She marveled at and envied the faith of Christians that could produce a marvel like this. [Read more…]

Is Harry Potter’s Baptism Important?

This Sunday is the Feast of Theophany or the Baptism of Christ in the Orthodox Church and services began this morning to celebrate it with Royal Hours. Only Pascha, Pentecost, and the Annunciation outrank the appearance of the Triune God at the River Jordan among the right-believing Christian faithful; in other words, it’s bigger than Nativity and why there are twelve days of Christmas. Among Greeks, it is sometimes referred to as the Photismos or the Illumination, even Enlightenment, because this is their word for Baptism. Read about Orthodox Theophany here, here, and here.

In 2011, we had something of a Roundtable discussion at HogwartsProfessor on the subject of the importance of Harry Potter’s baptism. Elizabeth Baird-Hardy, Louise Freeman, and John Patrick Pazdziora checked in with their thoughts and I of course added my own ideas. It’s well worth revisiting that piece today as a jumping off place for a second look at baptism in Rowling’s work, which I think has to be expanded to include the symbolism of light, of water, and the revelation of God by “illumination.”

Today, though, let’s just reprint that 2011 piece: [Read more…]

Rowling “Baptizing the Postmodern Imagination:” ‘Truth and Beauty’ (2017)

The talk above is one I gave in 2017 at the Highlands Latin School in Louisville, Kentucky.

I’m not sure it has a lot of ‘Fourth Generation Rowling Studies’ material, but it has some challenging ideas that ‘hold up’ even after the passage of seven years.

If I say so myself! Let me know in the comment boxes what you think of what I said about Rowling before her ‘Lake and Shed’ revelations and the Trans-TERF War.

Rowling’s Favorite Painting and What It Suggests about Her Artistry and Meaning

Rowling’s Q&A last Sunday in The Times of London was largely forgettable, as I discussed in ‘Rowling’s Q&A in the Sunday Times.’ Her answer to an outlier question about art in that set, however, was a ‘keeper’ on several levels:

What’s the first piece of art you loved?
I visited the National Gallery on my own when I was around 19 or 20 and was absolutely mesmerised by Caravaggio’s Supper at Emmaus. I had a battered print of it on my wall for years afterwards and it featured on my first ever website.

This was not a revelation. In what remains “the only authorized J. K. Rowling biography,” Lindsey Fraser’s 2001 Conversations with J. K. Rowling, much more of a seemingly superficial Q&A than a proper critical life history, Rowling concluded her answer to “Do you enjoy art?” this way:

Perhaps my favorite painting is Caravaggio’s Supper at Emmaus when Jesus reveals himself to the disciples having risen from the dead. I love it. Jesus looks very likeable – soft and rounded – and the painting captures the exact moment when the disciples realize who this man is, blessing their bread. (Fraser, 30-31)

The chapter in Beatrice Groves’ Literary Allusion in Harry Potter that convinced me of that work’s seminal importance and the writer’s true brilliance turned on her discussion of this comment and on the painting itself. Join me after the jump for a review of Prof Groves’ exegesis, the confirmation of her points in Literary Allusion  to be found in Rowling’s comments on Sunday, and some further points about Supper at Emmaus that the “mesmerized” Rowling may be assumed to have noticed. My idea is that her use of subliminal symbols ‘tracks’ with Carravagio’s and that we are called to a Ruskin-esque posture of “deep mining” before a painting if we are to grasp the depth of her writing.

I wrote to Professor Groves earlier this week to ask her permission to quote the passage in her Literary Allusion in Harry Potter about the Caravaggio painting, Rowling’s relationship with it, and what it reveals about the remarkable Christian Everyman subtext of Harry Potter. She graciously gave me her permission so here is that remarkable passage, a key really to the Christian content of the Hogwarts Saga: [Read more…]