Shared Text: Jon Stewart Tags Putin as Dark Lord

vladimort 1Can Russian kleptocrat Vladimir Putin fairly be likened to a certain murderous Heisman Trophy winner in the death of Boris Nemtsov? Or is he really like a certain twisted wizard? (At 4:00 in video.)

The murder of Russian opposition figure Boris Nemtsov, right outside the Kremlin in the heart of Moscow, has prompted a lot of speculation about what role, if any, Vladimir Putin played in the killing. Jon Stewart didn’t directly point the finger at Putin on Thursday night’s Daily Show, but he did laugh at the Russian president’s insistence that he will personally lead the investigation into Nemtsov’s murder.

Vladimort 3“Oh good, he’s vowing to find the real killer,” Stewart laughed, showing a photo of OJ Simpson. “That’s a promise that always inspires confidence. The only thing that could be more OJ is if Putin started stealing sports memorabilia….” which, of course, he allegedly has. Not that Stewart was done with the comparisons: Putin started out as a fairly normal guy, like Draco Malfoy in the first Harry Potter novel, he said, but after spending too many nights “in the dungeon-y parts of Hogwarts” with the bad kids, Putin has become “Lord Vladimort.” Hopefully there isn’t a sequel. —Peter Weber
You’ll note if you watch the video in the Daily Show clip, no one in the audience struggles to get the play on Tom Riddle’s preferred name if the reference to Robert Kraft’s stolen Super Bowl ring was a reach for many.
Vladimort 2Fans of the world’s richest leader can say this as a step up, of course. In the past, President Putin has had to deal with assertions that he was the model for Warner Bros’ depiction of Dobby the house-elf. You can’t make this stuff up. The nightmare figure of postmodern global geo-politics is haunted by Harry Potter associations. (Hat-tip to James!)

Two New Books from J. K. Rowling and Two BBC Blockbusters!

BibliographyHow about that! Two new books from J. K. Rowling and great forward progress on the teevee productions of her two Post-Potter efforts! Big news, right? Fandom marking dates for midnight release parties?

Well, not really. I’m afraid few stores will even carry the books in question, not to mention celebrate their publication, and both tomes will almost certainly mark historic low-sales marks for the Goddess of Blockbuster Book Launches.

Here’s the deal. The first book to be released is not really by Ms Rowling as much as it is a list of everything she has written and the ‘inside story’ of the writing, editing, and publication of this body of work. Read The Guardian‘s article here (hat-tip, David!).

2015 aAuthor and Sotheby’s director for children’s books Philip Errington has spent five years compiling the 544-page JK Rowling: A Bibliography 1997-2013, a work described as “slavishly thorough and somewhat mind-boggling” by Rowling which has just been published by Bloomsbury Academic. As well as providing complete bibliographic details of each edition of all Rowling’s books to date, in order to “record fact and dispel rumour” – and enable fans to work out if they might have a rare edition – Errington has also dug through Bloomsbury’s archives and interviewed its staff to include detailed information on the publishing history of Rowling’s books….

“There is a lot of incorrect information out there and this is a chance to set the record straight with detailed research,” said Errington. “I’m very fortunate that Bloomsbury let me into their archives, and that I was able to interview key people. This could act as a map for the future … you can see how the Harry Potter series just took off.”

Book stores almost certainly won’t be carrying it or participate in the launch because it is priced well out of most customers’ range. The hardback edition on Amazon is listed at $121 and the Kindle price is $57.99.

JKR3The Kindle price was $80 (and is still $100 at the publisher’s book page online) but the blowback in reader comments at Amazon was fast and red-hot. The book’s online caretakers have done all they can to quell this public outcry, in addition to dropping the eBook price by 25%, by squishing negative comments with votes that one star reviews are not helpful and, more telling, clicking on “comment does not add to discussion” (see TWS’ to-the-point sticker-shock review and all-but-erased reader response for a sample of this handiwork).

But perhaps readers are over reacting. This bibliography is not from the Bloomsbury division that published the seven Harry Potter novels in the UK and most Commonwealth nations. It is from Bloomsbury Academic. Academic imprints, like most University presses, market their books to higher education libraries and to teachers who will use them as textbooks in colleges and graduate schools. As such, prices over $100 are as much a norm as they are exceptional.

A quick survey of Bloomsbury Academics’ homepage and online catalog confirms this. Sort of.

The two most recent publications, Visible Self and Apparel Quality, are priced at $115 and $120, respectively. It isn’t until we drop well down the list to a history textbook released last year, S0uth Africa, sold for only $29.95, that we find a book less than three digits.

In the Bibliography‘s category, however, Children’s Literature, we find the Rowling Bibliography eBook priced at $100 (almost double the deftly discounted Amazon Kindle cost).

Other titles there, equally academic, are only $30, $40, and $28.

f39080870If you own a book published by Bloomsbury Academic, I’d bet it is a paperback copy of an Arden Shakespeare edition of Hamlet, Macbeth, or King Lear. Checking out the tab for those best sellers, we find that individual Bard of Stratford plays sell for between $13 and $19 in the latest series. More telling is that their latest textbook, Shakespeare on Global Stage, goes for $112 in hardback, $30 in paper covers, and $28 as an eBook.

So the question remains: is this a profit taking on Bloomsbury’s part? It strains credulity that they think this book will be primarily of interest to professors teaching classes on the subject. It is more like Melissa Anelli’s Harry, A History than an academic treatment of the Hogwarts Saga.

f38696678Fans of the books, however, myself included, would love to read the story of which books received heavy editorial work and which a relatively light touch (the Guardian article excerpts suggest, for example, that the Presence was exasperated by the many revisions requested for Prisoner of Azkaban, which title many readers consider her “break-out” book). Few of us are likely to purchase the book on release or at anytime until used copies become available, which won’t happen for several years.

By then, perhaps, we’ll have a book with the inside story on why this inside story was priced to restrict sales to libraries and affluent collectors. My uninformed speculation until we have that scoop will be along the lines that this reflects obliquely or directly the bad blood between the author and her former publishers. What percentage of the take she was offered or flat price she was paid for permission to quote her correspondence with Bloomsbury editors (or her condition for allowing publication in any form?) may be the root of the curious imprint placement and exorbitant charge for this book.

Very Good LivesThe second book being published with Ms Rowling’s name on it is Very Good Lives: The Fringe Benefits of Failure and the Importance of Imagination. From the Amazon book page:

J.K. Rowling, one of the world’s most inspiring writers, shares her wisdom and advice.

In 2008, J.K. Rowling delivered a deeply affecting commencement speech at Harvard University. Now published for the first time in book form, VERY GOOD LIVES presents J.K. Rowling’s words of wisdom for anyone at a turning point in life. How can we embrace failure? And how can we use our imagination to better both ourselves and others?Drawing from stories of her own post-graduate years, the world famous author addresses some of life’s most important questions with acuity and emotional force.

Sales of VERY GOOD LIVES will benefit both Lumos, a charity organization founded by J.K. Rowling, which works to transform the lives of disadvantaged children, and university-wide financial aid at Harvard University.

The book is 80 pages and sells for $12.34 in hardback and $9.99 on Kindle. That’s more than $.15 per page. A bargain, I guess, when compared to the Bibliography whose per page price is just under $.23, but then again, that tome has information we do not have already.

The Harvard Commencement address by Ms Rowling is available to be watched (and transcribed) on YouTube and the transcript is available online. As admirable as this may be as a fund raiser for Lumos, the Harvard University endowment hovers between $30 and $35 billion. That Harvard charges any of its students tuition is borderline scandalous:

In 2007, if Harvard had spent 5% of its $34.6 billion endowment [approximately half of what it will make in interest], all Harvard undergraduate and graduate students could have attended for free and the university would still have had $1.3 billion left over.

harvardAnd yet money is going from this book’s sales to fund Harvard’s “university wide financial aid”? When the speech can be seen and read online for free? I’ll make my contribution to Lumos directly, thanks. Harvard doesn’t need my money.

If Ms Rowling is sharing her “wisdom and advice,” I’m guessing again, that it has something to do with her new representation to publishers and other media. Very Good Lives is published by Little, Brown, the company that Neil Blair, her new agent, recruited for Casual Vacancy and the Cormoran Strike mysteries. If she is obliged to them for a given number of books, Very Good Lives is a stroke of genius, i.e., getting paid for work already done and which everyone interested has already read.

But Mr. Blair is making money for and with Ms Rowkling in other ways. His independent production company, Bronte Films, has been signed to make the BBC teevee serials of both Casual Vacancy and Cuckoo’s Calling. Ms Rowling will be collaborating on the scripts. Read about that here and here — and here and here (hat-tip, ChrisC!). And the three movie deal Blair negotiated with Warner Brothers for Fantastic Beasts?

Very Good Lives, indeed. Or at least ‘Very Well Compensated Lives.’

Cuckoo 1Given the percentage of Ms Rowling’s money that goes to charity (and, alas, to the Labor Party), I don’t begrudge her making as much as she can in order to give it away as she sees fit. My concern here, odd as it may seem to many, is that we are seeing literally here ‘the Death of the Author.’ Bibliographies are not usually produced for authors whose written work, beyond a few editorials and trading card backs, is limited to ten novels and a few charity toss-offs. And the deluxe edition of work already in the public domain also has the scent of a post mortem publication.

As excited as I am by both Casual Vacancy and the two of > seven Cormoran Strike novels we have, this air of profit taking from the past is slightly worrisome. Ms Rowling is entering her prime as a writer, her recent work demonstrates, and I more than half-expect the third Strike mystery to set off a mania not unlike that which Prisoner of Azkaban did for Harry Potter.

So why is she looking back or encouraging others to by these over-priced and unnecessary books?

Your comments and corrections are coveted, as always.

Guest Post: Hermi Emma and Beauty Belle — Lady of the Rings?

This Guest Post and brilliant ring exegesis is from Susan Raab (SusanRaab.com), a marketing strategist, high-conversion copywriter and best selling ghostwriter who not-so-secretly (she told me!) prefers reading the latest HogPro recommendation late into the night, or teaching another “Christian Content in Harry Potter” class for her contemplative prayer group, or architecting ring structure for her own book (not as easy as it looks).

Emma, Belle and Rings

With the news that Emma Watson has been cast as Belle in the upcoming live version of Disney’s Beauty and the Beast, the Internet has developed a rash of comparisons between Hermione and Belle.

Beauty and Beast WatsonBeauty and the Beast shares a lot more with Harry Potter than just Emma Watson.

Have you ever noticed that as musical theater, Beauty and the Beast is virtually indestructible?

A couple of summers ago, our local outdoor theater company produced it with local talent, and the result was more than a little rough around the edges.  But the truth is, no one’s gloomy or complaining when the flatware’s entertaining… especially with knives, forks, spoons and salt and pepper shakers gleefully skipping about, all under the age of eleven and terminally cute. And those napkins! Completely adorable. Well, be that as it may… it drew more patrons and made more money than any other family show since the last time it was produced, beating Peter Pan, Shrek, Once Upon a Mattress and others less memorable.

So WHY is Beauty and the Beast indestructible, even by the most rank of local talent? Faithful readers of Harry Potter as Ring Composition and Ring Cycle will not be surprised… yes, there’s a ring in there, even in musical theater. Here’s the illustration, John Granger style.

Beauty and Beast Ring

This didn’t happen by accident.  I’m sure Howard Ashman & Linda Woolverton created this symmetry intentionally.  And that whoever is chosen to direct this movie will not be able to screw it up!

I look forward to this great story’s continuing edification of those who choose to believe in the power of love in your heart.

 

Thoughts on Harper Lee’s “new” book

Mockingbird bookYou’ve probably heard the news:  Harper Lee is finally publishing a “long-lost sequel” to the classic To Kill a Mockingbird. Some consider Mockingbird one of the best young adult novels of all time—even though it was published before that genre was recognized—others argue it is not a YA work at all, and many think it doesn’t matter. But few would hesitate to classify it as one of the greatest American novels of the 20th century, and, as I have argued before the movie probably came the closest as anything in recent times to an authentic capture of the book’s magic. The American Film Institute named Atticus Finch its top movie hero of the last 100 years and even the current Superman says it’s his favorite.
Mockingbird boxOf course, once you read beyond the headlines, it becomes clear that the word “sequel” is a bit inaccurate. Apparently, this book was Ms. Lee’s original novel, depicting the adult Scout returning to Maycomb to visit her father, and looking back at the events of that summer with twenty years’ hindsight. She was advised to re-write the story from the child Scout’s point of view, though true book and movie fans will remember that the original book and movie still opened and closed with narration by clearly a grown-up Jean Louise Finch.

No doubt many are delighted to hear this news, but, in today’s world of Big Business Young Adult fiction, what will readers, old and (hopefully) young think of the different point of view? My two favorite Tweets on the matter:

Kaylee Webster: Is there going to be a midnight releasing? If so, I’m totally wearing a ham costume.
Kelly Lawler: If they make a movie out of this Mockingbird sequel, it’s totally going to be split into 2 parts.

atticusPersonally, I can’t help but hope that the book proves un-marketable to Hollywood, just because I can’t see anyone but Gregory Peck doing justice to Atticus.
The news of the release is also marred by suspicions about the text, and how it just happened to be “rediscovered” three short months after the death of Alice Lee, Harper Lee’s older sister and lawyer who staunchly protected her sister’s interests and privacy for decades, until she retired from her law practice at the tender age of 100. News stories about how Lee may have been cheated out of her Mockingbird copyright and about a recent maybe-authorized-maybe-not biography harper leehave re-surfaced and have raised questions over whether the 88-year-old author is in any shape to give informed consent to the publication of this material. Certainly she has a long-standing pattern of avoiding publicity and it seems odd for her to change her mind at her age. I sincerely hope there is a way of having someone with no financial stake in the matter look into the arrangement and confirm that everything is happening with kill a mockingbirdMs. Lee’s full understanding and in accordance with her wishes. As much as I’d like to revisit Maycomb, I would never want anyone to take Miss Maudie’s snow without her permission, even to build a rare and wonderful snowman for the neighborhood’s enjoyment.

If this story teaches us anything, it is that we need more Atticuses (or is that Attici?) to shield the Boo Radleys who prefer to stay indoors, advocate for the voiceless Tom Robinsons, and recognize the dignity of those as old and frail as the Mrs. Duboses. But then, we learned that back in 1960, didn’t we?

Discovery of Historical Inspiration for Tolkien’s One Ring

HistoryToday.com has published the fascinating story of a golden ring from Roman Britain and of two Pembroke College, Oxford, professors who were part of the effort to trace its origins. What’s intriguing about it, at least for serious readers of fantasy fiction, is that these two professors were R. G. Collingwood, archaeologist and dean of metaphysics, and J. R. R. Tolkien, he-who-needs-no-introduction. From the article ‘The Inspiration for Tolkien’s Ring:’

So how much did this story of a lost Roman gold ring influence Tolkien’s fiction? Silvianus loses his gold ring at Lydney, as Gollum lost his under the Misty Mountains. Silvianus believes his ring has been stolen by someone whose name he knows – Senicianus – just as Gollum thinks his ring has been stolen by Bilbo Baggins. Silvianus curses by name the person he suspects. Similarly, when Gollum works out that Bilbo has found and kept his ring, he cries out in rage: ‘Thief, thief, thief! Baggins! We hates it, we hates it, we hates it forever!’ Both Gollum and Silvianus know the identity of the persons they regard as thieves who have stolen their gold rings and both declare these names with maledictions.

However the relationship between Tolkien and Collingwood may have gone deeper. Collingwood’s developing approach to the philosophy of history may have appealed to Tolkien, who once declared that he much preferred history ‘true or feigned’. From 1926 onwards Collingwood was working on the theories that would become his book The Idea of History, in which he proposes the importance of objects as vectors for understanding and imaginatively recreating given historical events – pure gold ring territory.

Do read the whole thing.  My only quibble is the authors’ assertion that the years 1928-1929 were the years in which the form of The Hobbit was taking final shape.” Tolkien doesn’t begin the composition of The Hobbit until 1930 according to the accepted history and writes more than half of it in the months just before publication in 1936 and 1937. That would be the year that he read Williams’ Place of the Lion, a ring composition, when his and CSL’s ideas of what was possible in modern day story telling was re-shaped (re-forged?). For more on that pivotal year, see Bruce Charlton’s notes online in ‘The Notion Club Papers.’

Still, this is a fascinating link, especially given the presence of Collingwood, about whom more after the jump!