Rowling Rebukes Amnesty International, Highlights Important Court Case

Three notes on this tweet yesterday from Rowling and the several she has made about the case before Scotland’s Supreme Court, For Women Scotland Ltd (Appellant) v The Scottish Ministers (Respondent):

(1) What the Case is About: Per the Supreme Court website page on the case:

Issues

Is a person with a full gender recognition certificate (“GRC”) which recognises that their gender is female, a “woman” for the purposes of the Equality Act 2010 (“EA 2010”)?

Facts

In this appeal, the Appellant challenges the lawfulness of statutory guidance issued by the Respondent, which has the effect that a GRC recognising that a person’s gender is female brings them within the EA 2010 definition of a “woman”.

The Gender Representation on Public Boards (Scotland) Act 2018 is an Act of the Scottish Parliament (“ASP 2018”). It sets targets for increasing the proportion of women on public boards. The original ASP 2018 definition of a “woman” included people: (i) with the protected characteristic of gender reassignment; (ii) living as a woman; and (iii) proposing to undergo / undergoing / who have undergone a gender reassignment process. In a 2022 legal challenge brought by the Appellant (“FWS1”), the Court of Session found that this statutory definition was unlawful, as it dealt with matters that fall outside the legislative competence of the Scottish Parliament.

Following FWS1, the Respondent issued new statutory guidance. This is the guidance currently under challenge. It states that, under the ASP 2018, the definition of “woman” was the same as under the EA 2010. It also stated that a person with a GRC recognising that their gender is female has the sex of a woman.

The Appellant challenged the lawfulness of the Respondent’s statutory guidance in the Court of Session. The Appellant’s arguments included that the guidance failed to respect the decision in FWS1. On 13 December 2022, the Outer House dismissed the Appellant’s petition. The Appellant appealed. On 1 November 2023, the Inner House upheld the decision of the Outer House and dismissed the Appellant’s appeal.

The Appellant now appeals to the Supreme Court.

The case was heard today and will be decided tomorrow.

(2) Importance of Case: Rowling believes this case is, per a re-tweet, “one of THE most important legal cases in the UK/world right now. It will impact women’s & girls lives EVERYWHERE.”

What’s at stake that makes this important?

Scotland, incredibly, has legislated that having a ‘Gender Recognition Certificate’ stating that your gender is different than your biological sex means that you are effectively — and legally — a member of the opposite biological sex.

If the Court agrees with the Appellant, a women’s rights group protesting the government’s insistence that sex can be changed by the say-so of a bureaucratic agency, this nonsense will be reversed and all legislative bodies in the UK will have this decision as a blocking precedent to passing such laws and direction in the future.

If the Court agrees with the Respondent, the “transgender” over-reach into women’s safe spaces continues with the force of law as an enforcer to this delusion. Resistance to its contra-factual basis and provable harms to women will no doubt continue but victory will be delayed indefinitely.

(3) Another Break With Her Past: One of Rowling’s only jobs as a non-writer was as a translator for Amnesty International; “While she was working temporary jobs in London, Amnesty International hired her to document human rights issues in French-speaking Africa” (Wikipedia). It was a fit for her progressive views, especially those about resisting oppressive and autocratic political regimes, and her ideas of virtue, specifically sacrificial love, empathy, and courage. Rowling has now officially broken with ‘Manesty’ over their siding with the Gender Theory Extremists about women’s safe spaces and the core issue of whether biological men and women can ever change into their opposites. File this break along with her separation of self and identity with the Labour Party.

 

Rowling Tweets Strike Birthday Love — Hallmarked Man Nearly Complete

Three quick thoughts about Rowling’s birthday message to Cormoran Strike, a character in books she is writing, i.e., a person not real in any of the conventional understanding of that word (though very much in keeping with Rowling’s discussion of “real” in Deathly Hallows, Troubled Blood, and Christmas Pig):

(1) Hallmarked Man is not yet finished. Which means it won’t be published until this time next year? Nick Jeffery said as much in a recent post, but it’s still dreadful to type out and see written on a page. I wrote a year ago that the structural evidence of the first seven books suggests strongly that it was originally conceived as a septology a la Potter. The longer it takes her to finish Hallmarked Man, longer than it did, say, for her to write and prepare for publication the epics of Troubled Blood and Ink Black Heart (?), the more than thesis takes on tangential credibility, I think.

(2) One Thing Revealed about the Series Ending: The joking conversation with one of her characters, “try not to be a grumpy sod about turning fifty,” means that Cormoran Strike survives the seven book series’ many dangers and his enemies, and, more surprisingly, perhaps he survives Covid and the shots. Rowling has said previously that the series will end before the lockdowns and masking mania of Covid appear and today, it seems, we have been told, he lives on to celebrate his fiftieth birthday I doubt this sort of jest is a binding commitment not to kill her champion, But I’m hopeful.

(3) Strike’s Birthday: For a longish discussion of what we know and can figure out about Strike’s actual birthday in 1974, see ‘Troubled Blood: Strike’s Natal Chart.’

 

Sunday Potter Quiz: A Peck of Owls

Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix: Chapter Two: A Peck of Owls

1. Mrs. Figg could not have helped Harry against Dementors because she’s a what?
2. What was the name of the cat Mrs. Figg had set to watch as Harry’s erstwhile bodyguard?
3. Who is Mrs. Figg furious at for leaving Harry completely unguarded?
4. Mrs. Figg tries her best to kill the unrepentant guard with a string bag full of what?
5. True or False? While Harry was trying to explaining to the Dursleys about Dementors, Aunt Petunia supplied that they guard the wizard prison Azkaban.
6. The two letters Harry received from the Ministry of Magic were sent from which office?
7. What words did the Howler sent to Aunt Petunia scream?
8. True or False? After hearing Voldemort is after Harry, Uncle Vernon tries to force him out until Aunt Petunia stops him.
9. Uncle Vernon thought Dudley had fought off the dementors by doing what?
10. How many owls flew into the Dursley’s kitchen overall that night?

For Your Reflection: As Joyce Odell was the first to point out, Order of the Phoenix largely mirrors the action of Philosopher’s Stone, the first Harry Potter novel. Every Potter novel has its ‘Wizarding World makes Contact with Muggledom Moment at Privet Drive,’ though, when Harry leaves for school or comes into conflict with the Dursleys. Sometimes those world-meeting instances are comic — see Dobby and the pudding in Chamber and the ‘Blowing Up’ of Aunt Marge in Prisoner — and sometimes the Dursleys’ home is really invaded and turned upside-down — see the first, fourth, and seventh books, the ‘axis’ novels, for those. What makes the revelations of ‘A Peck of Owls’ (side question: isn’t the collective for these animals a parliament of owls? What is Rowling saying here by using the word ‘peck’?) significantly different than those Magic-Muggle meetings in Harry’s safe-house? What makes it resonant with the Hogwarts Letter invasion of Philosopher’s Stone?

Answers: 1. A Squib (20); 2. Mr. Tibbles (20); 3. Mundungus Fletcher (20); 4. Cat food cans (23); 5. True (31); 6. Improper Use of Magic Office (27-33); 7. ‘REMEMBER MY LAST, PETUNIA.’ (40); 8. True (38-41); 9. Giving them ‘the old one-two.’ (34); 10. Five (26-28-32-34-39)

Rowling’s Pregnancy Traps: Four Strikes

This is not a proper ‘Pregnancy Trap’ post but a hurried catalogue of all the “coercive love” relationships in the first four  Strike-Ellacott mysteries. I have written longish posts about the ‘Big Four’ Pregnancy Traps that play defining roles in the Harry Potter novels (Merope and Tom, Sr.), in Casual Vacancy (Krystal and Fats), in Cursed Child (Bellatrix and Tom, Jr.), and in the Strike series (Leda and Jonny); with this post and one other that surveys The Ickabog, Christmas Pig, and Beedle the Bard, I’ll wrap up this Golden Thread in an article on the Substack page for subscribers before moving on to the next Rowling Studies ‘common denominator.’

Book-by-book, then, shall we, Cuckoo’s Calling to Lethal White?

Cuckoo’s Calling

  • Charlotte Campbell trap to win Cormoran Strike

He closed his eyes. There could be no going back from this morning. She had lied once too often, about something too serious. But he went over it all again, like a sum he had long since solved, afraid he had made some elementary mistake. Painstakingly he added together the constantly shifting dates, the refusal to check with chemist or doctor, the fury with which she had countered any request for clarification, and then the sudden announcement that it was over, with never a shred of proof that it had been real. Along with every other suspicious circumstance, there was his hard-won knowledge of her mythomania, her need to provoke, to taunt, to test.

‘Don’t you dare fucking investigate me. Don’t you dare treat me like some drugged-up squaddie. I am not a fucking case to be solved; you’re supposed to love me and you won’t take my word even on this…’ Cuckoo, Part One, Chapter Seven

Jago Ross. She must have been in touch with him, seeing him, while they were still living together. Even Charlotte, with all her mesmeric power over men, her astonishing sure-handed skill, could not have moved from reacquaintance to engagement in three weeks. She had been meeting Ross on the sly, while swearing undying love to Strike.

This put a very different light on the bombshell she had dropped on him a month before the end, and the refusal to show him proof, and the shifting dates, and the sudden conclusion of it all. Cuckoo, Part Four, Chapter Five

The opening chaos on Denmark Street for the entire Cormoran Strike series, the opening that makes possible his first meeting with Robin Ellacott, is the Peg-Legged PI’s break-up with his on-and-off girlfriend of seventeen years, Charlotte Campbell. The ‘inciting incident’ for that key relationship inciting incident was Campbell’s having told her live-in lover and fiancée that she was pregnant and then saying that she no longer was pregnant. For Strike, with all his doubts about his own mother’s motives in conceiving him (?), this was a lie-too-far from a congenitally dishonest woman. Wrapped as it is in her probable relationship with Ross, in Cuckoo he resolves and keeps to his resolve never to renew their relationship.

In Silkworm, she sends him a text the day before her wedding to Ross, seemingly to rebuke him on this score, the simple message being “It was yours” (Silkworm, chapter 40). The first time they meet in the series post Calling is in Lethal White at the Paralympians Ball — and this is Strike’s first thought on seeing her:

“Corm, don’t go,” she said, reaching out. Her fingers did not quite make contact with his sleeve; she let her hand fall back by her side. “Don’t, not yet, I—you’ve done such incredible things. I read about them all in the papers.”

The last time they had seen each other he had been bleeding, too, because of the flying ashtray that had caught him in the face as he left her. He remembered the text, “It was yours,” sent on the eve of her wedding to Ross, referring to another baby she had claimed to be bearing, which had vanished before he ever saw proof of its existence. He remembered, too, the picture she had sent to his office of herself, minutes after saying “I do” to Jago Ross, beautiful and stricken, like a sacrificial victim.

“Congratulations,” he said, keeping his eyes on her face. White, Chapter Thirty-three

He keeps “his eyes on her face,” of course, because she is enormously pregnant with Ross’ babies, twins, at that time.

After Ink Black Heart’s confrontation with Jago Ross in which Strike reveals the video evidence to him and Charlotte of child abuse, she runs ‘Corm’ down in the street to share her elation about being freed to be with her old beaux again. Strike rebuffs her by saying that there is no way he was going to help her raise the children of Jago Ross, to which she replies that isn’t really a concern because she would not be pursuing sole custody of James and Mary. Strike is appalled by her indifference to the safety of her own children and whatever feelings he has for her are extinguished (Chapter 87). He recalls this moment in Running Graves’ dialogue with dead Charlotte in the Norfolk tower church, in his meeting with her sister Amelia Crichton, and, most importantly, in his final chapter conversation with Robin in the office.

Charlotte’s bizarro mysterious pregnancy drives Strike’s away from her at the start of Cuckoo’s Calling, his remembrance of her ‘It was yours’ claim at their meeting at the central part of the central novel in the series, and his return to the theme of her being someone with whom he had nothing in common and could have no relationship in the light of her indifference about parenting makes the first pregnancy, real or feigned as with her breast cancer, seem at least potentially to have been a pregnancy trap. [I have searched for but been unable to find the passage in which Strike thinks Charlotte sprung the trap to win him away from his obsession with his detective agency.] The beginning, middle, and end of the seven book series — and the longer the delay in producing Hallmarked Man, the more I am convinced the series was originally plotted as a seven rather than ten book epic — all turn on this subject, as explored in the Charlotte was Murdered substack posts and podcast.

All the allusions to this pregnancy in the books in Strike’s musings and Charlotte’s texts are without mention of “pregnancy” or “baby” or “abortion.” [Whoops! Strike thinks in Career, “Robin was one of only three people (he suspected) who knew about that putative baby that Charlotte claimed to have lost, but which might never have existed, or was aborted.” Chapter Forty] Rowling does her best here to keep those subjects in our mind by forcing us to think of them rather than sharing those ideas herself. If Hallmarked Man or Strike 9 turns on the murder of Charlotte Campbell, as Nick Jeffery and I believe one will, the mystery of the phantom pregnancy that drove Strike from Charlotte will be solved at last. With the equally mysterious but assumed pregnancy trap of Leda Strike to capture Jonny Rokeby, the series can conclude. [Read more…]

Rowling Responds to ‘Variety’ Article?

As I wrote yesterday, the organ of the entertainment industry, Variety, featured an article earlier this week by Adam Vary titled HBO Says ‘Harry Potter’ Series Will ‘Benefit’ From J.K. Rowling’s Involvement: She ‘Has the Right to Express Her Personal Views.’ Rowling appears to have responded to it without mentioning it by name in at least one tweet, perhaps two.

In the article, Vary quotes from interviews he had with Kat Miller, the “Creative Director” at MuggleNet, and Melissa Anelli, the long-time leader of the Leaky Cauldron website, best-selling author, and fandom convention entrepreneur. Each spoke about how difficult it is to be a Potter fan today because of Rowling’s supposed “transphobia” and “bigotry.” Vary ended his piece with a quotation from Miller:

Ironically, while Rowling’s actions have undermined many Potter fans’ dedication to her, they also appear to have strengthened those fans’ solidarity with each other. “Abandoning the fandom and shutting it down is not the place we wanted to be,” Miller says. “We see the value in the community that the fans created. We can love and enjoy that without the author.”

This has been something of a mantra among the Genderistas who are Potter-philes for the last five years: “We can enjoy the books and each other’s company while ignoring the poisonous opinions of the author.” Rowling’s tweet yesterday let her feelings be known about this sort of reader:

The timing of this post, in the wake of the Variety piece, leads me to think it possible, even likely, that it is Miller and Anelli specifically that Rowling is calling “dickheads.” [Read more…]