• Rowling Mocks Leftists Consumed by Nazi Salute, Who Call Enemies ‘Hitler’

    In an Inauguration Day rally, Elon Musk spoke to a crowd of Trump supporters at DC’s Capitol One arena. During his brief talk, he twice bumped his chest and threw out his right arm to the crowd, once to the group in front of him and immediately after to the crowd behind him. He said just before this talk that he was giving thanks from his heart to all those who had worked and prayed and contributed to Trump’s electoral college and popular vote triumph last November.

    The American Public Broadcast Service (PBS), a news organization funded by tax payers as well as private donors and corporations, tweeted that Musk’s gesture was a “Nazi” salute, a la Hitler’s Sieg Heil arm motion and the Italian fascist ‘Roman’ gesture. The Anti-Defamation League (ADL), a watch-dog for Neo-Nazi behaviors and anti-Semitism, immediately responded that Musk’s gesture had been misinterpreted by PBS and that, stressful as the transfer of power was for many in the US, a little grace was in order. It was not, from their view, a “Nazi salute.”

    Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (‘AOC’), an American politician and activist serving since 2019 as the U.S. representative for New York’s 14th congressional district, weighed in to condemn both Musk for the salute and the ADL for being ‘soft’ on Nazi-ism (!). (She was not at the inauguration or any of the balls afterward because “I don’t celebrate rapists.”) Firebrand and catnip that she is to friends and foes respectively, her branding Musk’s gesture as a sure sign that he is a closet fascist showing his true colors generated the inevitable memes of other politicians, to include AOC, extending their arm in that fashion while speaking to the public. Historians of twentieth century totalitarianism, most notably Gerald Posner and Niall Fergusson, dismissed AOC as a partisan crank.

    I share all that because Joanne Rowling Murray (‘JKR’) teamed up with Gender Critical feminists to mock on Twixter those Progressive gate-keepers who make risible historical analogies. These “TERFS” as a rule who have spent the last five years being branded by leftists as “Nazis,” “fascists,” even “Holocaust deniers” because of their resistance to “transgenderism.” JKR’s preferred partner in these staged satirical conversations, as we’ve seen earlier this month, is Julie Bindel, who wrote Rowling with a true confession about her struggle with Nazi salutes:

    Read More “Rowling Mocks Leftists Consumed by Nazi Salute, Who Call Enemies ‘Hitler’”

  • Rowling Tweets on Strike Psyche Profile

    This too brief but fascinating look at Strike’s psychological make-up by Robert Galbraith herself came at the end of an equally intriguing thread about Hannah Arendt, Eichmann, and the banality of evil “transgender” fellow-travelers.  That longer effort of Rowling’s deserves its own post; today let’s look at the one-off response to someone who engaged Mrs Murray about Arendt. Three thoughts?

    (1) Strike Laid Bare: Rowling-Galbraith tells us point blank Strike’s strengths and weaknesses, and, in that exposure suggests strongly the direction of his transformation. “One of the reasons I enjoy writing him is that while he’s fairly honest with himself, he can still be blinkered about his own motivations and the extent to which the past is influencing his present behaviour.” Strike is about to be confronted in inescapable fashion, I think it safe to say, with “his own motivations” which will reveal to him the “extent to which the past is influencing his present behavior.” His ability to change in that crucible will be critical to his relationship with Robin.

    (2) Strike and Rowling Agree:  “Character is destiny” but… (Strike) “strokes of unearned good fortune and bad luck may hit anyone, irrespective of character” and (Rowling) “accidents of birth, chance and mischance shape all of our lives, too, and may overwhelm the strongest personalities.” Rowling’s artistry is depicting the morality of archetypal characters when challenged by “past and present context,” depictions of behavior for our reflection, empathetic identification, and cathartic experience. Again, Strike is about to be hit betwen the eyes with all that he has neglected in the “accidents of birth,” Strike’s being a supposedly ‘accidental birth,’ and perhaps by the “chance and mischance” of losing Robin to another man. I for one can’t wait.

    (3) A Lake Point? Joanne Rowling was not born with a silver spoon for her porridge but “character” and writing genius as well as “chance and mischance” have brought her to the heights of fame, fortune, and notoriety coupled with adulation, albeit in different spheres. I think it is credible, as a reflective woman experienced in Cognitive Behavior Therapy and one who has studied psychology as an amateur, that Rowling thinks about her life, its twists and turns and tumbles and triumphs, more than most. And that this reflection on the tension between “character” and the “context” of “past and present” circumstances informs her Strike novels as something like an axis.

    Hence the importance of this seeming off the cuff or throw-away look at Strike’s psychological perspective. Footnote it for reading before and after Hallmarked Man!

  • Rowling Tweets about Trump Executive Order Contra Gender Theory Ideology

    President Donald J. Trump signed an Executive Order today only hours after his inauguration, one titled, “DEFENDING WOMEN FROM GENDER IDEOLOGY EXTREMISM AND RESTORING BIOLOGICAL TRUTH TO THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT.” As he pledged during his campaign almost a year ago, Trump delivered on “Day One” a Gender Critical feminist ‘magic wand’ wish list. Read the whole thing at the WhiteHouse.gov link above, but here is a handy summary of “Defending Women:”

    Responses from Gender Critical feminists varied in their enthusiasm for this breakthrough Executive Order that sets the cause of Transgender Radical Activists back to zero.

    On the one hand, many women lauded Trump for delivering on his pledge to “defend women” and “restore biological truth:”

    Other feminists chose to lament that, though Trump’s Executive Order delivered everything that the Gender Critical community could have wanted from an American politician, that this man they despise was the one to do it.

    Rowling tweeted about the “Defending Women” Executive Order in response to a Susan Dalgety tweet on the subject.

    Dalgety, the editor of The Women Who Wouldn’t Weesht, despises Trump. Her twixter feed during Trump’s inaugural address featured a series of tweets that snarkily dismissed his pledges to pursue American energy independence (“Fuck the planet“), to “bring back law and order to American cities” (“Says the first convicted felon to be POTUS“), and to “extend our territories” even to Mars (“Thank you says Musk“). She even chose to mock Trump’s ‘air kiss’ to his wife with the suggestion that she wore a broad brimmed hat to prevent him from landing lips on her face (“Form meets function” reposted from ‘The Daily Show’). Most revealing, perhaps, of her Trump Derangement Syndrome was her tweeting “Crazy Stuff” as her verdict on his judgement that he was “saved by God to make America great again.”

    Dalgerty’s take on the “Defending Women” Executive Order? Predictable — ‘It’s okay, but, y’know, Trump:’ Read More “Rowling Tweets about Trump Executive Order Contra Gender Theory Ideology”

  • Rowling Bankrolls Gender Critical Resistance in UK and Australia

    Today Rowling retweeted an X posting by Julie Bindell that included her recent podcast comments about Pink News, an interview she chose to caption with the brief and terse, “I sued Pink News.”

    It was not news per se but Rowling’s retweeting it included her back and forth replies to Bindell that of course went out to Rowling’s 14 million plus followers on that platform. It had a startling finish:

    The “shocked” bit is evidently sarcasm, meaning “this was very well known and you know very well how involved I was in that suit.” Bindel’s “I don’t like to mention it” is similarly sarcastic; she is not one to suffer injuries or fools quietly (her courage in reporting the Muslim rape gangs for many years speaks to her temperament in this regard). Rowling segues from that false humility or reserve to the subject of her having been rumored to be bankrolling this lawsuit against Pink News, which Bliden confirms.

    And then Rowling drops what seems to be the point of the re-tweeting and the entire exchange. “I feel today’s a really good day to let the delightful Cohen and James know I was indeed backing you.” Rowling as a rule does not flaunt her private generosity in public. What has happened to make 18 January a “really good today” to reveal that she had been paying Blindel’s significant legal costs in her battle against Pink News, costs that would otherwise have bankrupted the independent journalist?

    Two explanations are credible, I think.

    The first is that this is Pink News specific. The two owners of this LGBTQ+ publication are facing a landslide of allegations from former employees of sexual misconduct and, at best, a “hostile work environment.” If you listen to the Blindel podcast comments about Pink News, the edited version makes sure to highlight Blindel’s comments that Pink News published almost 700 articles about J. K. Rowling to defame her as a “transphobe,” “bigot,” and “TERF.” Today would be the day to reveal to “Cohen and James” that their attempt to wait out Blindel and bankrupt her in a kind of “lawfare” had failed because the journalist had the barracuda barristers of a billionaire at her side; their fall from grace, Rowling seemed to think, was the right moment to reveal a la the Count of Monte Christo who their real persecutor is.

    Hence the popularity of this meme today:

    The message seems to be Rowling telling those who come for her that actions have consequences, i.e.,  F. A. F. O.

    That makes sense except that the Pink News story is more than a week old by BBC time and Rowling said “today’s a really good day” to reveal she had Blindel’s back in this court case. This is beside the points that Rowling is not given to either flashing her generosity for social media credit or doing end zone dances. Why “today,” then?

    Check out this story today in the UK Daily Mail about a Gender Identity case in the Australian courts: Read More “Rowling Bankrolls Gender Critical Resistance in UK and Australia”

  • J. K. Rowling and President Trump are Both Thinking of Greenland

    J. K. Rowling has changed her Twitter header, but this time it’s unlikely to be Strike-Ellacott related. Of course the -5 deg C (25F) overnight temperatures in Edinburgh, may just be reminding her of her Summer holiday, aboard her yacht, but Greenland has been in the news recently for other reasons.

    Hours after his son Donald Trump Jr touched down in the capital, Nuuk, on Tuesday, the US president-elect, Donald Trump, held a press conference, where he refused to rule out using military force to make Greenland part of the US, and threatened to impose “very high” tariffs on Denmark, of which Greenland is an autonomous territory, if it gets in his way.

    The Kremlin is closely following U.S. President-elect Donald Trump’s claim to Greenland, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said on Thursday. Whether this is with an aim to contain the US’ ambition, or as inspiration for their own is not yet clear.