Rowling’s Favorite Painting and What It Suggests about Her Artistry and Meaning

Rowling’s Q&A last Sunday in The Times of London was largely forgettable, as I discussed in ‘Rowling’s Q&A in the Sunday Times.’ Her answer to an outlier question about art in that set, however, was a ‘keeper’ on several levels:

What’s the first piece of art you loved?
I visited the National Gallery on my own when I was around 19 or 20 and was absolutely mesmerised by Caravaggio’s Supper at Emmaus. I had a battered print of it on my wall for years afterwards and it featured on my first ever website.

This was not a revelation. In what remains “the only authorized J. K. Rowling biography,” Lindsey Fraser’s 2001 Conversations with J. K. Rowling, much more of a seemingly superficial Q&A than a proper critical life history, Rowling concluded her answer to “Do you enjoy art?” this way:

Perhaps my favorite painting is Caravaggio’s Supper at Emmaus when Jesus reveals himself to the disciples having risen from the dead. I love it. Jesus looks very likeable – soft and rounded – and the painting captures the exact moment when the disciples realize who this man is, blessing their bread. (Fraser, 30-31)

The chapter in Beatrice Groves’ Literary Allusion in Harry Potter that convinced me of that work’s seminal importance and the writer’s true brilliance turned on her discussion of this comment and on the painting itself. Join me after the jump for a review of Prof Groves’ exegesis, the confirmation of her points in Literary Allusion  to be found in Rowling’s comments on Sunday, and some further points about Supper at Emmaus that the “mesmerized” Rowling may be assumed to have noticed. My idea is that her use of subliminal symbols ‘tracks’ with Carravagio’s and that we are called to a Ruskin-esque posture of “deep mining” before a painting if we are to grasp the depth of her writing.

I wrote to Professor Groves earlier this week to ask her permission to quote the passage in her Literary Allusion in Harry Potter about the Caravaggio painting, Rowling’s relationship with it, and what it reveals about the remarkable Christian Everyman subtext of Harry Potter. She graciously gave me her permission so here is that remarkable passage, a key really to the Christian content of the Hogwarts Saga: [Read more…]

Rowling and the Kennedys: Part Two

Yesterday I posted a YouTube video of J. K. Rowling accepting the Robert F. Kennedy ‘Ripple of Hope’ Human Rights award with a note about how upside-down it seemed to me that a feminist like Rowling would have a serial adulterer such as RFK as a hero. I think I understand that better today, though not because of evidence that the third son of Joseph Kennedy was a faithful husband or kind to the women in his life. He wasn’t  — or at least the dominant historical narrative today says he wasn’t.

Reading the transcripts of RFK’s 1965 Affirmation Day speech in South Africa, the so-called ‘Ripple of Hope’ address, though, and of Rowling’s 2019 Ripple of Hope Award brief acceptance talk has clarified for me that Kennedy was Rowling’s “political hero” — and the stupendous disconnect between the Kennedy family today and those who act with political and personal courage contra mundum and contrary to the expectations of family, friends, and fans.

After the jump, I’ll share highlights from those transcripts, I’ll review the 2020 comments made by Kerry Kennedy, one of Robert and Ethyl Kennedy’s eleven children and the principal guardian of his legacy, about Rowling and those she made last week last week about her brother, RFK, Jr., and the responses made by Rowling and Bobby Kennedy’s namesake about those rebuffs. Join me for that information and my thoughts about the unusual position RFK, Jr.’s beliefs put Rowling and her curious silence about his campaign to become President. [Read more…]

Rowling and the Kennedys: Part One

Joanne Rowling had two childhood heroes, Jessica Mitford and Robert F. Kennedy. She named her first daughter for the one and took the first name of the other for her second pseudonym, ‘Robert Galbraith.’

Both these choices for role models or exemplars are curious for reasons I hope are obvious. Mitford was a determined and public communist through the worst of the Stalin era and RFK was, with his father, brother, and, some say, his namesake, a serial abuser of women. For an anti-authoritarian feminist from the lower middle class, this hyper-privileged pair from the wealthiest of families with beliefs so contrary to those she champions herself have always just made me shake my head. My childhood heroes were Mohandas Gandhi and Woody Guthrie, both of which men I understood by the time I graduated high school were men with admirable qualities and with off-setting failings that made them unfit as types for emulation.

Tomorrow I hope to discuss Rowling’s reception and then return of the RFK Ripple of Hope Award in the context of RFK, Jr’s recent run for President, endorsement of former President Trump, and predictable response of his family. Today I hope you’ll enjoy JKR’s profession of admiration for RFK, Sr., and why she admired him as she did.

 

Guest Post: Dueling Puzzles

A Guest Post from Randall Voigt about the puzzling intersection of information from Fantastic Beasts and what we learned about Ariana Dumbledore’s death in Deathly Hallows. Enjoy the challenging questions!

In Deathly Hallows, Aberforth and Albus Dumbledore describe the three-way duel with Gellert Grindelwald that resulted in Ariana’s death.  Aberforth says, “I don’t know which of us did it, it could have been any of us – and she was dead” (Chapter 28).  Albus says “I never knew which of us … actually cast the curse that killed my sister …. I dreaded beyond all things the knowledge that it had been I who brought about her death, … that I actually struck the blow that snuffed out her life” and that “Ariana … lay dead upon the floor” (Chapter 35).  But years earlier, as recounted in Secrets of Dumbledore, Albus tells Newt Scamander, “I can’t say for certain it was my spell …. One minute she was there, and the next she was gone …” (Scene 66).

Several things are puzzling here.

What kind of magical spell hits Ariana?  Could it be a spell that makes her disappear, maybe not killing her at all?  Or, is it in fact a killing curse, leaving Ariana lying “dead upon the floor”?  In Secrets, Albus confirms that Ariana was an obscurus [Scene 66];  could it be that she is not killed, or that she is killed but the obscurus continues to exist, or that in either case the obscurus is transferred to Aberforth and/or to Credence? [Read more…]

Mailbag: Alchemy of Hallmarked Man?

I received a comment on my post ‘Rowling Q&A in The Sunday Times’ that included an off-topic question. I have elected to answer it here rather than on that thread. It’s a subject in which I think a lot of HogwartsProfessor readers are interested, for one thing, and none of them would be going to a post on the Times Q&A to learn more about it.

Hi. I agree. Her recent interview [with The Times] was meant to sell newspapers rather than give real information. Whatever you’ve got to say about The Supper At Emmaus, I’d like to hear it. It’s an interesting Christian painting.

Besides that, I’ve got a question about Strike #8, The Hallmarked Man. All the clues she’s given us are about metals.  Metals say “Nigredo” to me, but the predominance of silver says #8 might be the  “Albedo” book? If so, was The Running Grave the “Nigredo” book?  Thanks for reading. Looking forward to your answer.

There are actually three questions in those two paragraphs. Here are my answers for this Serious Striker:

(1) “What do you think of Caravaggio’s Supper at Emmaus?”

If you are a HogwartsProfessor subscriber over at Substack, you’ve already received my long-form essay on this subject. I hope you’ll read it and let me know what you think.

(2) “Was Running Grave the ‘Nigredo’ novel in the Cormoran Strike series?”

Great question! We will not know until we have all ten books in the Strike Saga but it certainly was a break-down piece for both Robin and Cormoran.

If I had to wager on the subject (and, being broke, the betting would have to be for amusement rather than remuneration), I’d go with Evan Willis’ idea on the Tetrachtys structure of the ten book set, which, if memory serves, has a three book nigredo ‘triad,’ a two book albedo and one book rubedo ‘monad,’ that last in parallel with Christmas Pig. See ‘Why the Cormoran Strike Novels are a Ten Book Series‘ for the math and the alchemy.

Of course, Rowling-Galbraith might be doing in the ten book series what Bronte Studios is said to be doing in the ten year adaptation of the Hogwarts Saga, i.e., one year for each of the first four and two for each of the last three. Alchemically, that would give us two books for each of the ‘back-side’ reverse alchemy turtle-shell lines. See William Sprague and Louise Freeman for the ‘reverse alchemy’ idea in Potter and Strike.

(3) “Will The Hallmarked Man be the ‘Albedo’ novel in the Cormoran Strike series?”

No idea! I can point you to a Serious Striker, though, who has given this a lot of thought (and written cogently about it, too). Which is to say, “Someone in addition to Evan Willis and the piece linked to in the answer to the second question.”

That would be Beatrice Groves, Research Fellow and tutor at Trinity College, Oxford, and author of  Literary Allusion in Harry Potter, who in her post at the HogwartsProfessor Substack about Rowling’s latest twixter picture ‘The Golden Journey to The Hallmarked Man‘ provides links to other articles she has written that explore the alchemy possibilities in Strike8. Here is the paragraph with those links to save you the search:

The second thing that struck me was, of course, the alchemical possibilities of the title of Flecker’s poem – some gold to add to all that silver! I’ve written about the possible influence of alchemy and precious metals on Strike 8 before and had predicted the keyword ‘silver’ in the title of all the epigraph texts of The Hallmarked Man – maybe instead they will all have a precious metal in the title? The ‘sound of silver bells’ in the wider poem was also a line that stood out given that we know Silver Bells, by Dean Martin is going to play some kind of role. Most striking in this regard is the ‘glimmering sea’ of Rowling’s header quotation, as it is so close the silver sea of the previous epigraph text we have been given. That sea turned silver by the sun glinting from it: ‘“A silver sea! A silver sea!” he cried aloud, and into his mind there flashed an incongruous comparison of the bountifulness of Nature’s silver with the pitiful grains they hacked out of her rocks with such toil and hardship’ (A Maid of the Silver Sea).

To answer your question, “Evan Willis and Beatrice Groves think that Hallmarked Man will be an albedo novel.” They come at the subject from remarkably different angles and they seem to have arrived at the same conclusion.

If you’re wondering why I’m not entering this fray, the answer I think is in this ‘Rowling Studies’ podcast that Nick Jeffery and I posted, you guessed it, over at the HogwartsProfessor Substack site. Check out Memorial Day’s ‘On Reading, “On Writing:” A Four Generational Approach to J. K. Rowling’s New Q&A.’ In that conversation, Nick and I discuss the rut that Rowling Studies is in, one, incidentally, that I helped dig and sustain over more than two decades.

The rut, in brief, is interpreting Rowling novels as they come out, exegesis largely independent of her work as a whole and devoid of discussion of its inspiration in psychological ‘Lake,’ labor that continues until Team Rowling begins to drop cookie crumb clues — Twixter contests, cameos, and scene shots! — about the nest book, at which time all energy shifts to predictions about that novel (scorecards about bullseyes and misses to be scored post publication).

Forgive me, but, having done that book sales-fandom excitement pro bono work for Rowling, Inc., for as long as I have, I think it’s time to re-think what we’re doing, kick back on the guess-work, and do the “slow mining” reflection that Ruskin recommended in Queen of the Air to get a better appreciation of Rowling’s artistry and meaning. I helped pioneer the ‘Let’s Guess!’ speculative game during the inter librum years of Potter Mania to help introduce readers waiting on the next book to ideas like literary alchemy and psychomachia.

That’s just not necessary anymore, I think. What we need now is a critical biography approach as well as an oeuvre wide perspective, frankly, a less frenetic and breathless enthusiasm for an anticipated or just published work and more Larger View take on what The Presence is writing. That’s still lot’s of fun, trust me, and has all the advantages of being new ground.

So, count me out on this year’s guesswork about Hallmarked Man. I think the Checklist I wrote before Ink Black Heart is still a good guide if you want to go there. I’m simultaneously in rut-recovery and excited about exploring a new methodology.

Love to Father Nicholas and Kansas friends from Oklahoma!